Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums banner

Tilting Antenna for Better Reception

49926 Views 63 Replies 30 Participants Last post by  distox
Will angling an antenna upward improve reception?:confused:
61 - 64 of 64 Posts
Simple answer to a complex question.

Since most television signals are horizontally polarized, when you tilt the antenna, it is not to receive the true signal - with LOS would provide. But to try to receive a signal which is refracted over the horizon and two edge.

If you stop and think about it, it will only work for a UHF signal and not for a VHF signal. The theory for the UHF Yagi antenna is that each director receives the signal, which is then reflected back to the next director which also receives the signal, but also add's that portion of the signal which it receives and the total of all the directors in the array is the total amount of gain over dipole.

That is the reason why the XG 91 Antenna's Direct aerial works so well.
The reflector behind the array and behind the dipole is what reflects the sum of all the parts of the signal back down against the dipole.

At the same time, when you point the rabbit ear antenna up in the air, you are skewing the signals - which when everything was VHF and analog, might have actually improved the signal. But with UHF and digital, the length of the aerials is very critical so as to be the same length - either full wave or 5/8 or half wave so that you can receive the signal. That type of antenna needs to be horizontally opposed 180* from each other.

Several examples for my area is channel 13 - which is 28 7/8ths inches long for a 1/2 wave antenna. On the other end of the spectrum, channel 51 - only requires a antenna 17 inches long for a full wave.

By using a frequency chart, a tape rule and a frequency conversion calculator, I can adjust the length of my rabbit ears antenna to tune in most any frequency above channel 13 and get the best possible signal.

Just as a example - channel 3 has a wavelength of about 46 1/8 inches for a quarter wave antenna. Could you imagine someone having a rabbit ears antenna inside of their house that was 184 inches long on each side.

They would have to live in a room the size of a basketball court just to be able to properly aim the antenna.

With a dipole antenna, aim is more critical as is placement. But if you keep the length of the wire going from the balun to the television as short as possible, you can really get some good signals out of it. Even a home built antenna with nothing more then two properly cut pieces of wire.
See less See more
Antenna Tilter....

I fabricated this antenna tilter last year with the hope of improving my reception of channels 4.1 and 7.1 which I seemed to have trouble getting consistently. After performing several manual setups with tilt I decided to make this device.
It was designed to produce an upward tilt of approx 25 degrees and a downward tilt of approx. 15 degrees. I used a linear actuator and a little bit of steel tubing to come up with this mechanism.
Now I can rotate as well as tilt, and can successfully receive my problematic stations with believe it or not approx 10 degree upward tilt.
My antenna is located on a second story roof with absolute clear LOS towards Lake Ontario. Trees or tall building were not an issue. I couldn't figure out why these stations were so difficult to receive other than possible multipath.

My reception has improved since the transition so that I now get 25 channels.

I firmly believe that antenna tilt can affect the reception quality.
See less See more
Strange that you had such difficulties with 4.1 and 7.1 near Lake Ontario, but impressive work nonetheless!
Has anyone in the Montreal area with a directional antenna (such as the XG 91) pointing at Mt Mansfield tried tilting?
61 - 64 of 64 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top