Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums banner
1 - 8 of 8 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
17 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
In my unscientific experiments done with homemade DBGH, SBGH and C2 antennas the DBGH was the most effective. The SBGH marginally outperformed the C2. The construction was not ultra-precise but was more careful than some of the antennas whose pictures have been posted here. They are within 2-3 mm of the designs with regard to length and straightness, with a bit more variability in thickness of materials depending what was on hand.

For deep fringe where an attic, roof or tower is available I would definitely recommend DBGH. For ordinary fringe areas or where space doesn't permit a DBGH then I would use a SBGH. Where an in-room antenna is required I would build a C2 and try to make it as attractive or inconspicuous as possible by using a nice board with some kind of picture or frame, and optionally a hinged mount of some kind so that it can be rotated as required when in use and returned flat to the wall when not in use. Some great ideas I've seen have been to either incorporate the antenna elements into a design on the front of the picture, or else hide them on the back behind a rigid foam board and an art poster.

Two of the cheapest, easiest to use materials I found are galvanized fencing wire from Home Depot (sometimes called Bottom Wire) for the bent elements and aluminum telescoping curtain rods for the reflectors. These will seldom coincide with the dimensions called for in the antenna designs, but I suspect that they will be adequate most of the time. For indoor antennas pine boards or 2 to 4 inch rigid foam panels are cheap and easy to work with. More robust materials are required for outdoor antennas.

I tried adding NARODs to a SBGH and didn't notice a big difference in reception for hi-VHF channels. I didn't try adding caps to my C2.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
123 Posts
joshh said:
In my unscientific experiments done with homemade DBGH, SBGH and C2 antennas the *DBGH* was the most effective. The SBGH marginally outperformed the C2.
It would be nice to compare apple with apples...
IMHO the antenna is a device "fishing" for a signal. There is so much of a "signal" one could fit in cross-sctional area of the space occupied by any given antenna "design." I mean for a given area, the smallest antenna getting the higher signal level is most efficient. Please, do not forget about the width angle of the coverage...

It means that if you take a larger antenna with bigger area coverage, and this antenna is good, it always gets the better signal.

Having said it, take an antenna with a larger area and compare it with an antenna of an equal size (hint, hint....)

Then one can say that this is better antenna then the other one (call it just my inflamed imagination).
 

· Registered
Joined
·
17 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
The SBGH and C2 are approximately the same size ...

I started making detailed notes of station reception and relative quality (of the local Ottawa analog signals) when testing the DBGH but unfortunately I lost the notes and didn't review the channels methodically by the time I was testing the SBGH. The DBGH was cut in two to make 2 SBGHs so I couldn't repeat the tests.

One thing that definitely happened is the DBGH picked up OMNI2 channel 66 digital (that's how my TV learned about it) and neither of the smaller antennas can do it (testing in the living room, not near a window). Not that the Simpsons and foreign language newscasts are significantly improved by digital :rolleyes:

It was only my impression that the SBGH was better than the C2. One or two channels seemed to be picked up less reliably with the C2. The SBGH looks more substantial with the separate reflectors and feeder lines so I wasn't surprised by this, but what do I know?

The C2 is a far more attractive looking antenna and also easier to build. Anyone who wants to experiment and who hasn't got a lot of deep-fringe ambitions could start with a C2 and test in their living room, then depending on results try SBGH and then DBGH, moving the antenna upstairs, to the attic, and so on. They can probably give away the C2 to a friend who will be happy to get a significant boost beyond their current rabbit ears.
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top