Joined
·
59,108 Posts
In this case I think that Rogers is correct?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...000-after-telemarketing-probe/article1955368/
http://www.businessreviewcanada.ca/industry-focus/technology/rogers-agrees-pay-crtc-settlement
It looks to me like Rogers was letting their pre-paid customers know that they were about to lose their number/service, but the CRTC says this is telemarketing. Very odd, but perhaps there's more to the story than I read in these articles?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...000-after-telemarketing-probe/article1955368/
http://www.businessreviewcanada.ca/industry-focus/technology/rogers-agrees-pay-crtc-settlement
It looks to me like Rogers was letting their pre-paid customers know that they were about to lose their number/service, but the CRTC says this is telemarketing. Very odd, but perhaps there's more to the story than I read in these articles?