Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums banner

21 - 23 of 23 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
227 Posts
On the flip of all this, its more of a reason for people to add OTA so they can get programing that is UNIQUE.
I agree and this is one of the very few times the CRTC made the correct decision. US sub-channels are just one of the very few advantages OTA has over the BDU's. Take that away and OTA becomes even more niche than it already is.
Paul (Cable - free since 2009)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
This is just another stupid decision by the CRTC. There is absolutely NO reason to deny this channel. Also why can't the CRTC at least give Rogers the choice of adding WNED-DT2 (Think Bright) and removing WTVS Detroit entirely from the Toronto line-up?

I would really like to know what intervening parties were against this channel being carried. I can see an argument from TVO but any commercial broadcaster (including the CBC) should have no issues with this channel.
Because Roger's wants the channels for free
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,087 Posts
The CRTC is infested by former execs from Bell, Rogers, etc. They will insure that you will only watch what is of most benefit to them.
 
21 - 23 of 23 Posts
Top