Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums banner

Area 51 for Antenna Modelers & Builders (See Post #1)

423518 Views 1327 Replies 63 Participants Last post by  majortom
This thread has been created strictly for Antenna Modelers and Builders who like to live not just on the leading edge but on the bleeding edge of antenna research and development.

Area 51 is for posting and discussion of any computer model of any experimental antenna by Antenna Modelers and Builders

Area 51 is not for casual builders or newcomers to ask questions or look for useable home antennas. Participants here are expected to fairly well "know their stuff".

If an antenna design is shown to be worthwhile for general public consumption we will move it out of Area 51 into the main Antenna Research & Development Forum.

Just remember what the ancient map makers wrote when they had no further info to illustrate: "Beyond here be dragons!"
1 - 20 of 1328 Posts
Sounds good. Also for beginning modeling questions, there is still this thread :

http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=83772

which is also not for casual builders or to look for useable home antennas.
Does that sound reasonable?
Sounds as good as any. Autofils and I tried to come up with some sort of logical naming scheme for the GHs and just couldnt do it. Almost gives me a headache thinking about it, heh. :p
making it a second iteration Koch Curve on at least the longer leg of the element.
firimari, thats a somewhat perfect example of what belongs in this thread, stuff thats cool (like my quad and octal GHs), yet probably shouldnt be built using techniques yet available to us. (I think I could build the above correctly, but wouldnt recommend others to do so)
But because of the higher SWR on the lower channels, the net gain chart wont be so flat.

Firimari, since we cant see inside of that plastic middle, I cant be positive the Fracarro P54 is as your model. When I first saw that Fracarro P54, I thought it may be a one wire design with the balun connecting in the middle at the ends of the folded single wire. Kind of like a twisted up folded dipole.
X-014

I put a 20" X 36", 2 by 4 inch mesh reflector 4 inches behind the X-011 and got a little bit more gain out of the design. 13 dbi versus 12 dbi (or less for the same frequency) for the Fracarro P54.





For a 12 dbi antenna, it has a very wide beamwidth. This 3D beamwidth pattern is at 585mhz, channel 33, the middle of the new UHF band. It also appears to be a fairly forgiving design, spacing-wise. This could be a very cheap and easy antenna to build using electric fence stand-offs that are made for chain link fences. (available at Tractor Supply)




And the NEC file :

CM Experimental Antenna
CM Italian Four Diamond Antenna Design X-014
CM AWG Gauge 6 Copper Wire elements, 2 by 4 inch mesh reflector
CM Reflector to Driven Element distance - 4.0 inches
CE
GW 1 1 0 -0.4188583 0 0 0.41885827 0 0.089
GW 2 11 0 0.41885827 0 0 4.84110236 4.84110236 0.081
GW 3 11 0 4.84110236 4.84110236 -0.1968504 0 9.68220472 0.081
GW 4 7 -0.1968504 0 9.68220472 0 -2.9209055 12.6031102 0.081
GW 5 7 0 -2.9209055 12.6031102 0 0 15.5240157 0.081
GW 6 11 0 -0.4188583 0 0 -4.8411024 4.84110236 0.081
GW 7 11 0 -4.8411024 4.84110236 0.19685039 0 9.68220472 0.081
GW 8 7 0.19685039 0 9.68220472 0 2.92090551 12.6031102 0.081
GW 9 7 0 2.92090551 12.6031102 0 0 15.5240157 0.081
GW 10 11 0 0.41885827 0 0 4.84110236 -4.8411024 0.081
GW 11 11 0 4.84110236 -4.8411024 0.19685039 0 -9.6822047 0.081
GW 12 7 0.19685039 0 -9.6822047 0 -2.9209055 -12.60311 0.081
GW 13 7 0 -2.9209055 -12.60311 0 0 -15.524016 0.081
GW 14 11 0 -0.4188583 0 0 -4.8411024 -4.8411024 0.081
GW 15 11 0 -4.8411024 -4.8411024 -0.1968504 0 -9.6822047 0.081
GW 16 7 -0.1968504 0 -9.6822047 0 2.92090551 -12.60311 0.081
GW 17 7 0 2.92090551 -12.60311 0 0 -15.524016 0.081
GW 139 3 -4 -10 18 -4 -10 16 0.050949
GW 140 3 -4 -10 16 -4 -10 14 0.050949
GW 141 3 -4 -10 14 -4 -10 12 0.050949
GW 142 3 -4 -10 12 -4 -10 10 0.050949
GW 143 3 -4 -10 10 -4 -10 8 0.050949
GW 144 3 -4 -10 8 -4 -10 6 0.050949
GW 145 3 -4 -10 6 -4 -10 4 0.050949
GW 146 3 -4 -10 4 -4 -10 2 0.050949
GW 147 3 -4 -10 2 -4 -10 0 0.050949
GW 148 3 -4 -10 0 -4 -10 -2 0.050949
GW 149 3 -4 -10 -2 -4 -10 -4 0.050949
GW 150 3 -4 -10 -4 -4 -10 -6 0.050949
GW 151 3 -4 -10 -6 -4 -10 -8 0.050949
GW 152 3 -4 -10 -8 -4 -10 -10 0.050949
GW 153 3 -4 -10 -10 -4 -10 -12 0.050949
GW 154 3 -4 -10 -12 -4 -10 -14 0.050949
GW 155 3 -4 -10 -14 -4 -10 -16 0.050949
GW 157 3 -4 -6 18 -4 -6 16 0.050949
GW 158 3 -4 -6 16 -4 -6 14 0.050949
GW 159 3 -4 -6 14 -4 -6 12 0.050949
GW 160 3 -4 -6 12 -4 -6 10 0.050949
GW 161 3 -4 -6 10 -4 -6 8 0.050949
GW 162 3 -4 -6 8 -4 -6 6 0.050949
GW 163 3 -4 -6 6 -4 -6 4 0.050949
GW 164 3 -4 -6 4 -4 -6 2 0.050949
GW 165 3 -4 -6 2 -4 -6 0 0.050949
GW 166 3 -4 -6 0 -4 -6 -2 0.050949
GW 167 3 -4 -6 -2 -4 -6 -4 0.050949
GW 168 3 -4 -6 -4 -4 -6 -6 0.050949
GW 169 3 -4 -6 -6 -4 -6 -8 0.050949
GW 170 3 -4 -6 -8 -4 -6 -10 0.050949
GW 171 3 -4 -6 -10 -4 -6 -12 0.050949
GW 172 3 -4 -6 -12 -4 -6 -14 0.050949
GW 173 3 -4 -6 -14 -4 -6 -16 0.050949
GW 174 3 -4 -6 -16 -4 -6 -18 0.050949
GW 176 3 -4 -2 18 -4 -2 16 0.050949
GW 177 3 -4 -2 16 -4 -2 14 0.050949
GW 178 3 -4 -2 14 -4 -2 12 0.050949
GW 179 3 -4 -2 8 -4 -2 6 0.050949
GW 180 3 -4 -2 6 -4 -2 4 0.050949
GW 181 3 -4 -2 4 -4 -2 2 0.050949
GW 182 3 -4 -2 2 -4 -2 0 0.050949
GW 183 3 -4 -2 0 -4 -2 -2 0.050949
GW 184 3 -4 -2 -2 -4 -2 -4 0.050949
GW 185 3 -4 -2 -4 -4 -2 -6 0.050949
GW 186 3 -4 -2 -6 -4 -2 -8 0.050949
GW 187 3 -4 -2 -8 -4 -2 -10 0.050949
GW 188 3 -4 -2 -10 -4 -2 -12 0.050949
GW 189 3 -4 -2 -12 -4 -2 -14 0.050949
GW 190 3 -4 -2 -14 -4 -2 -16 0.050949
GW 191 3 -4 -2 -16 -4 -2 -18 0.050949
GW 194 3 -4 -10 -16 -4 -10 -18 0.050949
GW 196 3 -4 -2 12 -4 -2 10 0.050949
GW 197 3 -4 -2 8 -4 -2 10 0.050949
GW 201 7 -4 -2 18 -4 -6 18 0.050949
GW 202 7 -4 -6 18 -4 -10 18 0.050949
GW 206 7 -4 -2 16 -4 -6 16 0.050949
GW 207 7 -4 -6 16 -4 -10 16 0.050949
GW 209 7 -4 -2 14 -4 -6 14 0.050949
GW 210 7 -4 -6 14 -4 -10 14 0.050949
GW 215 7 -4 -2 -18 -4 -6 -18 0.050949
GW 216 7 -4 -6 -18 -4 -10 -18 0.050949
GW 218 7 -4 -2 -16 -4 -6 -16 0.050949
GW 219 7 -4 -6 -16 -4 -10 -16 0.050949
GW 221 7 -4 -2 -14 -4 -6 -14 0.050949
GW 222 7 -4 -6 -14 -4 -10 -14 0.050949
GW 224 7 -4 -2 8 -4 -6 8 0.050949
GW 225 7 -4 -6 8 -4 -10 8 0.050949
GW 227 7 -4 -2 6 -4 -6 6 0.050949
GW 228 7 -4 -6 6 -4 -10 6 0.050949
GW 230 7 -4 -2 4 -4 -6 4 0.050949
GW 231 7 -4 -6 4 -4 -10 4 0.050949
GW 233 7 -4 -2 2 -4 -6 2 0.050949
GW 234 7 -4 -6 2 -4 -10 2 0.050949
GW 236 7 -4 -2 -2 -4 -6 -2 0.050949
GW 237 7 -4 -6 -2 -4 -10 -2 0.050949
GW 239 7 -4 -2 0 -4 -6 0 0.050949
GW 240 7 -4 -6 0 -4 -10 0 0.050949
GW 242 7 -4 -2 -4 -4 -6 -4 0.050949
GW 243 7 -4 -6 -4 -4 -10 -4 0.050949
GW 245 7 -4 -2 -6 -4 -6 -6 0.050949
GW 246 7 -4 -6 -6 -4 -10 -6 0.050949
GW 248 7 -4 -2 -8 -4 -6 -8 0.050949
GW 249 7 -4 -6 -8 -4 -10 -8 0.050949
GW 251 7 -4 -2 -10 -4 -6 -10 0.050949
GW 252 7 -4 -6 -10 -4 -10 -10 0.050949
GW 254 7 -4 -2 -12 -4 -6 -12 0.050949
GW 255 7 -4 -6 -12 -4 -10 -12 0.050949
GW 257 7 -4 -2 12 -4 -6 12 0.050949
GW 258 7 -4 -6 12 -4 -10 12 0.050949
GW 260 7 -4 -2 10 -4 -6 10 0.050949
GW 261 7 -4 -6 10 -4 -10 10 0.050949
GW 265 3 -4 2 18 -4 2 16 0.050949
GW 266 3 -4 2 16 -4 2 14 0.050949
GW 267 3 -4 2 14 -4 2 12 0.050949
GW 268 3 -4 2 12 -4 2 10 0.050949
GW 269 3 -4 2 10 -4 2 8 0.050949
GW 270 3 -4 2 8 -4 2 6 0.050949
GW 271 3 -4 2 6 -4 2 4 0.050949
GW 272 3 -4 2 4 -4 2 2 0.050949
GW 273 3 -4 2 2 -4 2 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 274 3 -4 2 -2.185e-15 -4 2 -2 0.050949
GW 275 3 -4 2 -2 -4 2 -4 0.050949
GW 276 3 -4 2 -4 -4 2 -6 0.050949
GW 277 3 -4 2 -6 -4 2 -8 0.050949
GW 278 3 -4 2 -8 -4 2 -10 0.050949
GW 279 3 -4 2 -10 -4 2 -12 0.050949
GW 280 3 -4 2 -12 -4 2 -14 0.050949
GW 281 3 -4 2 -14 -4 2 -16 0.050949
GW 282 3 -4 2 -16 -4 2 -18 0.050949
GW 285 3 -4 6 18 -4 6 16 0.050949
GW 286 3 -4 6 16 -4 6 14 0.050949
GW 287 3 -4 6 14 -4 6 12 0.050949
GW 288 3 -4 6 12 -4 6 10 0.050949
GW 289 3 -4 6 10 -4 6 8 0.050949
GW 290 3 -4 6 8 -4 6 6 0.050949
GW 291 3 -4 6 6 -4 6 4 0.050949
GW 292 3 -4 6 4 -4 6 2 0.050949
GW 293 3 -4 6 2 -4 6 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 294 3 -4 6 -2.185e-15 -4 6 -2 0.050949
GW 295 3 -4 6 -2 -4 6 -4 0.050949
GW 296 3 -4 6 -4 -4 6 -6 0.050949
GW 297 3 -4 6 -6 -4 6 -8 0.050949
GW 298 3 -4 6 -8 -4 6 -10 0.050949
GW 299 3 -4 6 -10 -4 6 -12 0.050949
GW 300 3 -4 6 -12 -4 6 -14 0.050949
GW 301 3 -4 6 -14 -4 6 -16 0.050949
GW 303 3 -4 10 18 -4 10 16 0.050949
GW 304 3 -4 10 16 -4 10 14 0.050949
GW 305 3 -4 10 14 -4 10 12 0.050949
GW 306 3 -4 10 12 -4 10 10 0.050949
GW 307 3 -4 10 10 -4 10 8 0.050949
GW 308 3 -4 10 8 -4 10 6 0.050949
GW 309 3 -4 10 6 -4 10 4 0.050949
GW 310 3 -4 10 4 -4 10 2 0.050949
GW 311 3 -4 10 2 -4 10 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 312 3 -4 10 -2.185e-15 -4 10 -2 0.050949
GW 313 3 -4 10 -2 -4 10 -4 0.050949
GW 314 3 -4 10 -4 -4 10 -6 0.050949
GW 315 3 -4 10 -6 -4 10 -8 0.050949
GW 316 3 -4 10 -8 -4 10 -10 0.050949
GW 317 3 -4 10 -10 -4 10 -12 0.050949
GW 318 3 -4 10 -12 -4 10 -14 0.050949
GW 319 3 -4 10 -14 -4 10 -16 0.050949
GW 320 3 -4 10 -16 -4 10 -18 0.050949
GW 340 3 -4 6 -16 -4 6 -18 0.050949
GW 348 7 -4 10 18 -4 6 18 0.050949
GW 349 7 -4 6 18 -4 2 18 0.050949
GW 351 7 -4 10 16 -4 6 16 0.050949
GW 352 7 -4 6 16 -4 2 16 0.050949
GW 354 7 -4 10 14 -4 6 14 0.050949
GW 355 7 -4 6 14 -4 2 14 0.050949
GW 360 7 -4 10 -18 -4 6 -18 0.050949
GW 361 7 -4 6 -18 -4 2 -18 0.050949
GW 363 7 -4 10 -16 -4 6 -16 0.050949
GW 364 7 -4 6 -16 -4 2 -16 0.050949
GW 366 7 -4 10 -14 -4 6 -14 0.050949
GW 367 7 -4 6 -14 -4 2 -14 0.050949
GW 369 7 -4 10 8 -4 6 8 0.050949
GW 370 7 -4 6 8 -4 2 8 0.050949
GW 372 7 -4 10 6 -4 6 6 0.050949
GW 373 7 -4 6 6 -4 2 6 0.050949
GW 375 7 -4 10 4 -4 6 4 0.050949
GW 376 7 -4 6 4 -4 2 4 0.050949
GW 378 7 -4 10 2 -4 6 2 0.050949
GW 379 7 -4 6 2 -4 2 2 0.050949
GW 381 7 -4 10 -2 -4 6 -2 0.050949
GW 382 7 -4 6 -2 -4 2 -2 0.050949
GW 384 7 -4 10 -2.185e-15 -4 6 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 385 7 -4 6 -2.185e-15 -4 2 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 387 7 -4 10 -4 -4 6 -4 0.050949
GW 388 7 -4 6 -4 -4 2 -4 0.050949
GW 390 7 -4 10 -6 -4 6 -6 0.050949
GW 391 7 -4 6 -6 -4 2 -6 0.050949
GW 393 7 -4 10 -8 -4 6 -8 0.050949
GW 394 7 -4 6 -8 -4 2 -8 0.050949
GW 396 7 -4 10 -10 -4 6 -10 0.050949
GW 397 7 -4 6 -10 -4 2 -10 0.050949
GW 399 7 -4 10 -12 -4 6 -12 0.050949
GW 400 7 -4 6 -12 -4 2 -12 0.050949
GW 402 7 -4 10 12 -4 6 12 0.050949
GW 403 7 -4 6 12 -4 2 12 0.050949
GW 405 7 -4 10 10 -4 6 10 0.050949
GW 406 7 -4 6 10 -4 2 10 0.050949
GW 429 7 -4 -2 -18 -4 2 -18 0.050949
GW 430 7 -4 -2 -16 -4 2 -16 0.050949
GW 431 7 -4 -2 -14 -4 2 -14 0.050949
GW 432 7 -4 -2 -12 -4 2 -12 0.050949
GW 433 7 -4 -2 -10 -4 2 -10 0.050949
GW 434 7 -4 -2 -8 -4 2 -8 0.050949
GW 435 7 -4 -2 -6 -4 2 -6 0.050949
GW 436 7 -4 -2 -4 -4 2 -4 0.050949
GW 437 7 -4 -2 -2 -4 2 -2 0.050949
GW 438 7 -4 -2 0 -4 2 -2.185e-15 0.050949
GW 439 7 -4 -2 2 -4 2 2 0.050949
GW 440 7 -4 -2 4 -4 2 4 0.050949
GW 441 7 -4 -2 6 -4 2 6 0.050949
GW 442 7 -4 -2 8 -4 2 8 0.050949
GW 443 7 -4 -2 10 -4 2 10 0.050949
GW 444 7 -4 -2 12 -4 2 12 0.050949
GW 445 7 -4 -2 14 -4 2 14 0.050949
GW 446 7 -4 -2 16 -4 2 16 0.050949
GW 447 7 -4 -2 18 -4 2 18 0.050949
GS 0 0 0.0254 ' All in in.
GE 0
EK
LD 5 0 0 0 5.8e7 0
EX 0 1 1 0 1 0
GN -1
FR 0 38 0 0 470 6
RP 0 1 61 1001 90 0 3 6 10000 0
EN

On another note, I suppose it was inevitable, a rock group called Antennas, heh : http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=54660168
See less See more
3
Kind of like a twisted up folded dipole.
Thinking some more about it, the above models are like twisted loops, which kind of explains the wide beamwidth pattern for its gain. I googled, but couldnt find a radiation pattern for the Fracarro P54. Im not sure if Fracarro is the manufacturer or just a distributor, but they do have interesting designs in their catalog, pretty much all of mlords Italy pictures.
I am currently trying to cover both the FM Radio and VUHF-LO bands (54 Mhz to 108Mhz) with a single reflectorless hentenna based design, not having much success - VUHF LO alone or FM Radio alone appears to be more possible with a few added ons
A huge bowtie, ie 3 to 4 foot legs, that used to be very common when I was a kid should do you nicely if you dont want anything too fancy. Bowties have very wide bandwidths.
I think the NORAD’s are pure genius.
That and a lot of black magic, heh.

Perhaps you could link me to the use of the optimizer?
F1 - help > index > optimize, its all in there.
I googled, but couldnt find a radiation pattern for the Fracarro P54.
Found it !. Its here http://www.fracarro.com/international/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=97&&Itemid=250

It does have a wide radiation pattern. They changed the model numbering scheme to the "PU" series, heh.
Results are whisker length = 91.82 inches , whisker angle = 12.44 deg and gap between whiskers 4.22 inches - sounds a tad big but shows some very interesting patterns in the FM Radio band.
It does sound a bit big and at around almost 3/2 wavelength. The old vhf/fm bowties were around 1/2 wavelength wide (I dont think each whisker was more than 40 to 48 inches IIRC), which is about 69 1/2 inches at channel 6, so each whisker would be half that. The angle IIRC, was around 30 degrees. And a lot of them had a shorter horizontal dipole in the middle of the whiskers, which I believe was 1/4 wavelength of like the highest channel 13.

The max optimized version may be nice, but not practical for the additional gain, heh. Try optimizing from around 1/4 to 3/4 wavelength, the gain difference may not be that significant to the 3/2 wavelength version.

I think there may be pictures of the old vhf-hi bowtie posted somewhere on this forum.

Here ya go, step one on the Alliance Rotor instructions has a drawing of one.
See less See more
I may play a bit more to see if I improve the SWR at 54Mhz (9.4) and impedance (33 Ohm). (and add the shorter dipole in the middle) Thanks again
On a single bowtie, you can change the impedance a lot, hence the SWR, by changing the feedpoint gap. What kind of gain are you getting with it ?
(and add the shorter dipole in the middle)
Yeah, I would make the center dipole either the top freq youre after or the lowest freq. Then the vee pairs would be at the lowest freq or the highest freq, if you get my drift.

Heres what the head, the feedpoint, on one of those old vhf bowties looked like :



Ill see if I can dig it out again and get some measurements.
See less See more
Yeah, firimani and I have. Its all astupidoldmans fault !!! heh, heh. (been saving that one up, heh)
Did not consider a single bowtie worth naming in a bleeding edge section
Its still bleeding edge 1940's technology, which is still good, heh. With your above figures, that gives it about a 4.63 net gain on channel 5, which is better than all the other antennas found here http://www.hdtvprimer.com/ANTENNAS/comparing.html, with the exception of Winegard YA-1026 Wideband Yagi for VHF 2-6 and Channel Master 3671B VHF/UHF combo. And youre not done tweaking yet !

Back view picture of the head I have :


Top view picture:


The feedpoint gap is 1 24/64 inches (1 3/8 inches). The forward swept angle is 100 degrees total on the top view picture. The looking at the back view, the spread angle is about 45 degrees total. And thats a 3/4 inch square boom piece.

We had the typical double bay version of the vhf-bowtie when I was a kid and had no trouble pulling in stations that were 80 miles away consistantly and relatively snow free with the antenna only mounted about 20 ft high.

One of the amazing things about the bowtie is, from the link holl_ands found, is that the bowtie was patented in 1898, and has been "discovered" again at least few times since then, heh.
See less See more
2
X-034

I also found that I really shouldn't include the F/B ratio in the optimizer, it just skews things so that it won't pay attention to the things that matter, which are minimizing SWR while maximizing Gain.
I agree, even more so in my case where I welcome less F/B ratio to pick up channels from the backside. Ive always been puzzled why antenna manufacturers think high F/B ratios are some kind of a selling point, heh. On the otherhand, they all make a big point on the box that their antennas are HDTV ready, heh. They need to get really creative and say that their antenna cures headaches and anxiety. (from not paying for high cable and satellite fees, heh)

Raw Gain:

SWR:

3D radiation pattern at 572mhz:
See less See more
3
is that the x-32 made out of 2x1 mesh?
Nope, common 2 by 4 inch mesh.

Horizontal 2D pattern:


Vertical 2D pattern:


And the NEC file:
http://www.wuala.com/300ohm/Documents/x034_2by4meshReflector.nec
See less See more
2
Still Running some crazy, ill-advised experiments on the Fractal antennas:
Looking better than ever. Hows your build of it coming ? Post some pics, it should look pretty. :p

Yeah, any more than 2 iterations, as a practical matter, would require building the antenna on a pcb board.
would a side by side work better than one over the other for narrowing the vertical beam-width?
Nope, and without being really really careful, you could inadvertantly split the main lobe into two narrower side ones, with no gain at dead ahead at all. http://www.hdtvprimer.com/ANTENNAS/ganging.html
I don't know what's up with the dip at channel 48.
Nothing really. Thats typical of what occurs on the GH at the breakup at the high end frequencies of its bandwidth. Also since the SWR dips at the same time, the net gain curve is smoother.

A prerequisite to building a 2nd or more iteration fractal antenna should be to have training in the Japanese fine art of origami, heh.

For some odd reason, I seem have a copy of "Fractal Programming in C" by Roger T. Stevens 1989, in front of me. The example programs are on 5 1/4 inch floppy, MS/PCDos format (unopened). If you think some may be useful, Ill see if the disk still reads once I dig thru my collection of old hardware crap, heh.
What ? No Peano, Hilbert, Sierpinski, Dragon, Phoenix curves, not to mention the Mandelbrot set ? Heh, heh.

Yeah, theyre basically only practical for cell phone/PDA type antennas printed on some kind of pcb.

That Italian Job antenna, with its nice wide front pattern, may make a nice wifi antenna for my use once I scale it for 2.4 GHz. Of course, I got to find a cheap source for the cable/connectors. They seem to want a fortune for a measly 25 foot piece, heh.
That doesnt look bad either. Im wondering if I use the same technique on the Italian Job, that it will be even better still, ie wide beam, high gain.

My biggest problem is finding cheap coax and connectors for it. It goes totally against my grain and principles to spend $50 to $100 for a measley 25 ft piece, or $10+ for a connector : http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833998039
If I did that, I would be kicking myself in the butt for a long time, heh.

Its pretty obvious that a lot of those Youtube wifi antennas havent been modeled.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 1328 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top