Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums banner

AM Radio Replacement

1929 Views 32 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  bryston
Time marches on and obsolescence continues.

It's been my habit for years to listen to CBC on an AM radio while cooking or working around the house. Soon it seems, their AM broadcasts will cease in favour of streaming.

Is there a replacement gadget, internet-connected, that can be a replacement source? Presumably I can set up my smartphone to do this, but in-home wi-fi can be spotty.

So the search begins for a low-cost table-top internet streamer.
1 - 8 of 33 Posts
A lot of AM CBC transmitters have been replaced by FM. CBC AM has been on FM here for decades. I believe there are more planned so a local FM station might replace the AM transmitter being shut down. AM/FM radios are typically under $100 if that becomes an option.

There is a good selection of internet radios on Amazon for $100-$300. They typically advertise up to 40,000 stations which covers most AM/FM stations in North America.

The use of a bluetooth speaker with a smartphone is a good idea as well. Most TV soundbars have bluetooth so you might already have one.
AM stations are slowly disappearing here as well. The CBC never had an AM transmitter. Most of the AM equipment is on its last vacuum tube and the stations seem to get shut down when repair or replacement costs too much. All of the AM stations here were either converted to FM or got sister FM stations decades ago. Most of them are now owned by Bell or Global now so the loss of one AM station doesn't matter to them. They fired most of the staff years ago and moved programming operations to a single regional network studio. The CBC radio stations are just Toronto repeaters.
I meant the CBC stations here. The CBC did add a local news office a few years ago but the announcement appeared to indicate it was for news gathering only. I am unaware of any local CBC studio that does local broadcasts.
I stopped listening to AM radio over 50 years ago (would have been longer but my car only had AM) and FM, with rare exceptions, 20 years ago. I'd rather drive listening to road noise than that garbage, especially most Canadian radio. These days, I download playlists to my smartphone and listen to those using bluetooth. It's not perfect since the car radio has a rather dated version of bluetooth but the audio quality is better than AM, about the same as SiriusXM and only slightly worse than FM.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
That's part of the problem. The CRTC limits the formats they license to main stream, middle of the road, mostly top 40 formats. Outside of the GTA, even less gets licensed. Up until the 1970s or 1980s, the CRTC mandated what radio stations were allowed to play. Sundays were limited to religious broadcasts, classical music and jazz. Free form FM rock stations were not allowed, except in border stations markets where US stations were stealing young Canadian listeners in droves. We were lucky enough to have some on cable and almost everyone I knew listened to them but the local stations were all top 40.

About that time, I remember when applications for a new station license were being considered. One was for an international music format, which would have been a great alternative for many. The CRTC decided to approve a second country music license instead. One time, the local college station started to play rock music and gained a sizeable market share. Local stations complained to the CRTC who told it to stop or it's license would be revoked. Things started to go downhill again when the big broadcasters started buying up small market stations and turning them into second rate corporate radio outlets. Now I only listen to streaming radio and pay for the privilege. It's better than listening to hours of corporate propaganda and music industry promoted top 40 music every day.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Judging by the mechanics of streetcars, it's obvious why they generate so much RF interference. Then they have the long overhead conductors that carry and transmit the interference for miles. A similar effect can be experienced by driving near any overhead power lines where the interference they emit can overpower weaker AM signals. The ignitions of gasoline powered vehicles generate a lot of RF interference as well. That's mitigated by using resistive ignition leads and shielding.

It should be relatively easy to mitigate or eliminate noise from EVs by using brushless motors (many already do) and solid state controls. I expect there are other reasons for eliminating AM in car radios. Personally, I find that AM is next to useless in urban areas due to noise from powerlines and, nearby commercial and residential sources. The only place AM is free from interference is out of the city where AM's major advantage, long range, makes it an asset.
See less See more
Antenna size is definitely an issue. The optimum length for an FM car radio antenna is just over 2 feet. The equivalent for an AM antenna is about 200 feet. Another issue is location. The optimum location is in the center of the roof. On the hood or trunk are next best. In the windshield or inside the car are sub-optimum. Farther away from RF noise generating sources such as the engine and other electronics is also better. The short windshield andtennas currently supplied with most cars is more aesthetically appealing but probably one of the worst places to locate them. It's the good quality of modern electronics that makes windshield antennas usable.
Yes AM can get noisy but then so does FM.
FM was designed to eliminate amplitude noise. When received in mono, it's almost noise free in any environment and at any signal level. It just fades out into a small amount of background noise. Then US and Canadian regulators decided to use a stereo format that introduced noise, especially when another stereo signal interfered. GM took advantage of that by making car radios that slowly switched to mono as the signal weakened. Problem (almost) solved. The difference in noise levels between a marginal stereo FM signal and mono FM signal are significant, at least in North America. I often switched my FM receiver to mono when listening to distant signals.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 8 of 33 Posts
Top