CRTC orders Bell, Telus and MTS to give consumers $310 million in rebates - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #1 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-01, 03:32 PM Thread Starter
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,716
CRTC orders Bell, Telus and MTS to give consumers $310 million in rebates

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) on Tuesday order Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream and Telus to rebate $310.8 million to its urban landline customers.

The rebate, payable to customers residing in urban areas, must be paid out in the next six months and will range from approximately $25 to $90 per subscriber. Details on how the funds will be sent out will be made available by the respective companies in coming days.



hugh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-01, 04:26 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Alberta moving to NB in Spring
Posts: 14
Well what do you know. The CRTC can be on our side after all.


Cheers
Vanlen is offline  
post #3 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-01, 04:31 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 502
Now what if we just left Telus for Shaw? I guess I won't be getting my money back for all those years?
atong is offline  
 
post #4 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-01, 05:08 PM Thread Starter
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,716
I don't know. Details to be put out in days. I was with Bell for those years (not now) so I certainly expect a share of the pie.



hugh is offline  
post #5 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-02, 01:48 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 384
So they give back $310.8 millions of the $1,6 billion that was stolen! Woopy! Talk about a great scam!!!
madhi19 is offline  
post #6 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-02, 09:40 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 30
Now I want my thousands back from Rogers.

Epson Powerlite Home Cinema 1080, Yamaha RXV-2700, PS3, Wii, Pioneeer DVR-650H-K Recoder, Paradigm Monitor speakers
Greg Moore is offline  
post #7 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-02, 10:02 AM
U
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,491
People don't take the time to read... Always assuming Bell is after their first born.

Firstly, know that the money that was overcharged by Bell in urban areas was a result of an order from the CRTC for Bell to set aside a fund to be used at a later date to bring technologies to rural areas.

Secondly, a portion of the fund will be used for rebates to people in urban areas because apparently the CRTC asked Bell to put too much money aside.

Thirdly, Bell wanted to use the money in rural areas to bring HSPA+ services but the CRTC instead ordered them to deploy DSL. Not sure how to read that one... Looking at the money Bell charges for Internet via HSPA+ vs. DSL I would say the CRTC was wise in their decision. But I also question the viability of DSL in rural areas with distance limitations and all. Maybe HSPA+ with a CRTC mandated tariff for rural areas would have been better...
U is offline  
post #8 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-02, 10:29 AM
57
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Rogers, 9865 & 8300-eHDD, Sharp LC75N8000U, Denon AVR4310Ci; Sony KDL40W3000, 9865
Posts: 56,069
When I watched the news last night, they stated that if you're not a current customer, or haven't been for a couple of months (can't remember the exact month), you won't get a rebate.

I too believe that since I paid into this for the entire time, then I'm entitled to a rebate as a former Bell customer.

57's Home Theatre (Latest equipment & photos)
57 is offline  
post #9 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-02, 11:34 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 14,922
Here's the CRTC ruling. The other companies have identical wording. It seems like former customers are out of luck. (non-HCSAs means non-high-cost serving areas)
Quote:
51. In the Commission's view, the effort associated with tracking down subscribers of record as of 17 January 2008 would introduce undue complexity, delays, and costs that could be avoided by applying the rebate to current subscribers. Accordingly, in the interest of benefiting subscribers to the greatest extent possible, the Commission directs the Bell companies to rebate their residential subscribers of record in non-HCSAs as of the date of this decision.
Dr.Dave is offline  
post #10 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 02:25 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 384
Am not blaming Bell am blaming the CRTC who using our money to bring the 21th century to every village of this country! Am sorry to say but if you live in a rural area you likely don't have a bus or a cab to take you to work either should we subsidize that to? You pay a lot less property tax than we do, and your air is probably way better! You might have to drive an hour to get to the nearest supermarket but you don't spend an hour a day every day stuck in traffic either!

I get DSL you get dial-up you want DSL pay the damn surcharge yourself! Or we can make a better deal you get DSL with that 1.6 billion that the CRTC stole from us and I get fiber at the price of DSL and you're paying for my fiber subsidies!

Last edited by 57; 2010-09-03 at 03:45 PM. Reason: language
madhi19 is offline  
post #11 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 08:17 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mascouche, Qc.
Posts: 283
well said!
Kevin007 is offline  
post #12 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 08:37 AM
U
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,491
mahdi19, tell us how you really feel!

Well said though, couldn't agree more...
U is offline  
post #13 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 09:01 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 317
mahdi19....
without the "villages" of this country you would probably be having concrete and plastic for lunch. Bon Appetit!
Korak is offline  
post #14 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 09:22 AM
U
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,491
Good point... But does it mean we have to subsidize their DSL?
U is offline  
post #15 of 43 (permalink) Old 2010-09-03, 09:26 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sudbury ON, and Red Lake ON
Posts: 1,054
madhi19, are you just assuming that people in rural areas don't pay much tax? I know that my parents pay a hell of a lot more in taxes (about 3 times) than I do living in a city, and get a hell of a lot less in services.

Maybe you should consider moving out of an area that blankets you in smog and leaves you sitting in gridlock for an hour a day.

They also have no access to DSL or even HSPA because they live in a cellular dead spot. They still make do with dial-up

TC-P54G25, JVC Receiver, Turbosound Impact 50 speakers, Turbosound Impact 110 Sub, Sony SA-WM500 Sub, Bell TV 9200
Deckster is offline  
Reply

Tags
mts , telus

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome