F-35 issues - Page 26 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #376 of 383 (permalink) Old 2014-06-09, 01:32 PM
OTA Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,878
Angry Reuters: Canada poised to buy 65 Lockheed Martin F-35s

I posted this Reuters story to /. a few days ago in case some of you have already seen it there: Canada is poised to buy 65 Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets. Round and round we go, the silliness never stops. As I've said here repeatedly, this government is hell-bent on buying that plane.



stampeder is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #377 of 383 (permalink) Old 2014-12-28, 04:39 PM
OTA Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,878
F-35 Unable To Properly See Battlefield Below

Here's another item to add to the "What a piece of junk!" list of F-35 shortcomings:
Quote:
When the Pentagon’s nearly $400 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter finally enters service next year after nearly two decades in development, it won’t be able to support troops on the ground the way older planes can today. Its sensors won’t be able to see the battlefield as well; and what video the F-35 does capture, it won’t be able to transmit to infantrymen in real time.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...lder-jets.html

So, in order to be stealthy (which we don't need, and which the Chinese and Russians have overcome with L-band radar anyways) the F-35 uses an internally mounted technology that is 10 years behind the capability of the newest external-pod-mounted gear on today's F-18s and other similar fighters. But, putting those newest external pods on an F-35 defeats the whole point of the stealth technology, so round and round we go on a hideously expensive piece of junk.



stampeder is offline  
post #378 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-05-06, 08:08 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto - Rogers 8300HD PVR
Posts: 3,617
So it appears Trump is upset with Canada and guy in charge of the F-35 program has written that the F-35 program "does not allow the F-35 to participate in a fair and open competition".

Easy solution then - don't bid. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f35...orce-1.5125009
nfitz is offline  
 
post #379 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-08-17, 06:18 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 4,850
Wow. This old thread still has legs? Alrighty then. The Lockheed Martin F-35's per unit cost has dropped to $80M, still has defects, but more and more countries are buying. Canada's competition will be interesting. The new Super Hornet Block III will challenge with a number of very effective upgrades. The Airbus Eurofighter might be in the mix as it too has a number of effective upgrades and last but not least the Saab Jas-39 E/F Gripen is flying three prototypes that has all the bells and whistles.

It should be interesting, but barring Canada re-establishing a domestic industry to manufacture a fighter jet (Eurofighter and Gripen), I think it will come down to the F-35 and the SH. I believe Canada will choose the Super Hornet and its Electronic Warfare Variant, the Growler.
nfitz likes this.
Nanuuk is offline  
post #380 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-08-18, 11:35 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 4,850
I say Canada may go with the Super Hornet option, but would add the caveat that it would have to be in the price range of the F-35. The cost of operations would be lower for the SH and current spare parts and weapons inventories could be used from what I understand. The cost of the EF and Gripen are unknowns, but I would hazard a guess that they'd be higher simply because not as many are being manufactured. The Gripen has the lowest operating cost of the group.
Nanuuk is offline  
post #381 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-08-18, 03:46 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 225
Been following this thread for a while. Old man flew cf 100's '59-61 out of North Bay as a back seater. 433 Squadron A.W. Interceptor 2 engines were a must. Still are.
pinto is offline  
post #382 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-08-19, 10:23 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 4,850
I don't necessarily subscribe to that theory. Single engine safety records are quite good and some article I've read believe just as good as two engines. Of the four a/c in the competition, two have two engines (Super Hornet and Eurofighter) and two have single engines (F-35 and Jas39 E/F). There are a number of plus's for each aircraft that will make this an interesting competition.
Nanuuk is offline  
post #383 of 383 (permalink) Old 2019-08-30, 03:21 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 11,104
Airbus is out.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/air...ters-1.5265665
Quote:
Airbus Defence and Space, which was pitching the Eurofighter Typhoon, notified the Liberal government Friday that it was not going to bid.

The decision was made after a detailed review of the tender issued by the federal government in mid-July.

The move leaves only three companies in the contest: Lockheed Martin Canada with its F-35; Boeing with the Super Hornet; and Saab, which is offering an updated version of its Gripen fighter
Jake is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in













Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome