Wind Mobile is a go! - Page 4 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #46 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-11, 10:24 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Some things make my day. This made my week. I hope this is the start of a flood of choices, and not just on the mobile front.

The existing telecos brought this on themselves. They had plenty of opportunities to provide good service at a fair price, and instead they stacked the CRTC with their own people in order to gouge us. Politicans are not stupid, they can sense discontent.

IMO corporations that use patriotism for their own financial gains are committing treason. We have put up with this for too long.
billhome is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #47 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-11, 11:36 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Montreal QC
Posts: 24
I wonder when Videotron will ready their 3G network since Wind does not own any spectrum in Quebec. I'm it's soon and Videotron matches Wind and undercuts the big 3.
MTL_1225 is offline  
post #48 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 06:44 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Guelph
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
timlocke. wind does use 2100 in canada, but 1700 is the uplink, 2100 is the downlink. its unusual because its split into two unlike the other bands they use 850 uplink/850 downlink, so we only say 850 once, not twice. otherwise we'd say 850/850, 1900/1900, 1700/2100, but it becomes too cluttered, so instead we will use 850/1900/AWS/IMT, got it?
Thanks Paolo. After my last post I did go and research this. Still seems complex for the number of radios on a chip for a phone with power constrained by a tiny battery. Especially with wifi and bluetooth in there as well... the wonders of modern electronics. The phones may have to have 3 receivers and two transmitters going at the same time ( tx bluetooth and some phone or wifi, rx gps , bluetooth and some phone or wifi)
Anyway... all I care about is that these phones can instantly connect to and work on the best available network when roaming without me having to manually tell the phone to search for a network. AND importantly NOT to have to buy an expensive BB to get this facility.
timlocke is offline  
 
post #49 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 10:46 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 4,850
Hugh, I wasn't trying to mock your comment at all. On the contrary. I used quotations around the word corrupt to recognize your use of the term which (I believe) you meant to indicate a corruption of process. I posited that the process was working as it should as cabinet has always been the final arbiter of an Act even though an arms' length regulator has been ceded that responsibility. I do agree there is 'corruption of process' in terms of two different federal ministries having a say in the matter. That needs to be rectified.
Nanuuk is offline  
post #50 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 12:09 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 5,401
DSgamby is online now  
post #51 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 12:10 PM
U
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,491
For the record I agree with Hugh on this whole thing. The current government is clearly biased against the CRTC and this whole deal really seems fishy to me.

Don't get me wrong, I welcome competition and I have complained many times on this forum and elsewhere that we Canadians don't have good rates on mobile packages but I'm not ready to see the rules "bypassed" like this to get there.
U is offline  
post #52 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 01:33 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
"The current government is clearly biased against the CRTC and this whole deal really seems fishy to me"

This ruling is only a day old, has anyone actually had the time to do the analysis and determine that is actually the case?

In general I have a problem with quasi-government regulatory bodies like the CRTC - they usually end up serving the industry they are suppose to regulate. They are stacked with appointees from the industry who rotates between these bodies and the industry, and the consumer gets the shaft. An example other than the CRTC is the Ontario Securities Commission. Like the CRTC, they have the authority to send people to jail, but they have never done anything for the consumer. Unless you are a very wealthy investor, the commission you pay today is the same as 20 years ago, while in the U.S. they are significantly less. And those who have had their investment accounts stolen (literally) cannot find support form the OSC who is suppose to protect them.

Bodies like the CRTC is suppose to make them independent from the politicians. But from a consumer perspective, the industry is a far worse enemy than the policitans.
billhome is offline  
post #53 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 02:32 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: montreal
Posts: 333
Just my 2 cents but I hope these guys FAIL big time.

Don't get me wrong...I think we need more competition in Canada but WIND doesn't bring this to the second largest market in the country...Quebec.

The earlier they can go bankrupt, the better. Make room for true nation-wide competition. Never thought I'd defend them but at least Bell/Telus/Rogers provides service everywhere.
dynot is offline  
post #54 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 02:47 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,927
Read in the paper that they will have plans "starting as low as $30/month". Explain to me how this is competition?
jayoldschool is offline  
post #55 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 03:30 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 63
In my humble experience commissions can rule on their domain but a government body always, always has the right to overturn their rulings. Ask me how I know. So I believe this was open to interpretation and it was interpreted differently by Cabinet. The next applicant can have the same process and result occur in the same circumstance.

Rogers, Bell, and Telus look corrupt to me and actually need this wake-up call.
shawdirect is offline  
post #56 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 04:22 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,302
Rogers doesn't provide cell service to most of Newfoundland and all of Labrador.
barter is offline  
post #57 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 04:31 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond. BC
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paolo View Post
timlocke. wind does use 2100 in canada, but 1700 is the uplink, 2100 is the downlink. its unusual because its split into two unlike the other bands they use 850 uplink/850 downlink, so we only say 850 once, not twice. otherwise we'd say 850/850, 1900/1900, 1700/2100, but it becomes too cluttered, so instead we will use 850/1900/AWS/IMT, got it?
Actually, all the bands are split, just generally not by so much.

The European/Asia 2100 band is 1900 up / 2100 down for instance.

The description on phone spec's is generally more like:

GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 (quadband "world" coverage or some subset for local usage)
UMTS/WCDMA/HSPA: 850/1900/2100 (Common for North America, UMTS bands I, II, V)) or 900/1800/2100 (Common for Europe and other parts of the world). Quad-band UMTS phones are very rare or perhaps even non-existant for models actually in production and distribution but would need 850/1700/1900/2100 for decent world-wide and North American UMTS coverage.

The actual band IDs can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMTS_frequency_bands
robsawatsky is offline  
post #58 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 05:10 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Waterloo On
Posts: 39
It's about time

Wind its about time! No more gouging from Ma Bell and Rogers and I don't like the 3 yr contract bs. If Clement's decision was corrupt, then corruption in the public interest is most welcome. Let the best company win.

Deltafin
deltafin is offline  
post #59 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 07:34 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
Will they use regular HSPA which is 3.6/7.2 or HSPA+ like Rogers/Telus/Bell upgraded to???
sonny is offline  
post #60 of 114 (permalink) Old 2009-12-12, 07:36 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Whitby
Posts: 2,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynot View Post
Just my 2 cents but I hope these guys FAIL big time.

Don't get me wrong...I think we need more competition in Canada but WIND doesn't bring this to the second largest market in the country...Quebec.

The earlier they can go bankrupt, the better. Make room for true nation-wide competition. Never thought I'd defend them but at least Bell/Telus/Rogers provides service everywhere.
Err.. it's not like it was by CHOICE.
They didn't win the bids for spectrum in Quebec...
recneps77 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome