Do I Need Luxury Cables? - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #1 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-12, 02:18 PM Thread Starter
57
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Rogers, 9865 & 8300-eHDD, Sharp LC75N8000U, Denon AVR4310Ci; Sony KDL40W3000, 9865
Posts: 56,068
Do I Need Luxury Cables?

Interesting report from PC World...

Quote:
Whether you hook up your TV via digital connections, analog connections, or both, you are unlikely to detect any difference in picture quality between a cable with a moderate price and a luxury brand. The only difference you're likely to notice is how the cable looks behind your TV.
...and the money missing from your wallet (57)

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/artic...77,pg,1,00.asp

As we have indicated on this forum many times, there is no difference in ultimate picture quality between a modestly priced cable and a "luxury" cable (like Mon$ter).

I would have preferred if the PC World testing were done "double blind", but the results in this case are "the same" in that the actual performance of the cables was "the same". Yes, there were minor differences in some electronic measurements.

Interestingly, one "failing" of the $300 Mon$ter brand HDMI cable was that due to the weight of it, it fell out... Quite the opposite of the connectors on the Mon$ter Component Video cables which are almost "too snug" and have been known to damage the equipment they're connected to...

Edit: We have had similar comments from others on this forum - the heavy cables can either fall out, or damage the HDMI port on equipment, due to the weight of the cable. The lighter (28 ga) cables can therefore be better for your TV, provided you don't need the 22 or 24 ga for in-wall installations or long lengths like 15'+. (25' changed to 15' due to newer specs (HDMI 1.4, 3D, etc) in recent years, as per below)

The cables tested cost US$18-$300.

Edit 2010.09.09 (modified for additional bandwidth for newer specs, BD, etc.): Another test result with similar results, however, at longer lengths (15'+) or for in-wall applications, it's best to get a "good" cable, just as we have repeatedly stated here. For longer lengths, suggest 22 or 24 ga.

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hdmi-cabl...t-2-268788.php
Link may take some time to display, be patient.

Long Cable Test... Mon$ter not worth it again.


Edit 2008.02.24 - MarketPlace confirms the same:

http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=81285

Edit 2008.12.16 - CNET:

http://reviews.cnet.com/hdmi-cable/?tag=mncol;txt

57's Home Theatre (Latest equipment & photos)
57 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-12, 03:33 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oakville
Posts: 801
I find that I spend my time watching what is displayed on the front of my TV and I rarely ever look at how nice the back of my TV looks. Therefore, I'll take a pass on the "luxury brands".

Lurker is offline  
post #3 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-12, 10:03 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Aurora, ON
Posts: 1,989
And many guys with way too much $$$$$$, don't care, as long as they
have the most expensive "name" brand equipment.
So if they want to help keep the ecomomy rolling, that's fine with me.
What gets me is when someone with few dollars gets duped into buying
something he doesn't need.
But they "buyer beware" is a fact of life everywhere.

It doesn't matter if your glass is half empty or half full.
Drink up and get a refill!
harmer is offline  
 
post #4 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-23, 09:33 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11
Cables

If you have high end equipment then yes. Otherwise, there is no different.
I am CDN is offline  
post #5 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-24, 06:29 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by I am CDN
If you have high end equipment then yes. Otherwise, there is no different.
no...did you even read the thread?
googe is offline  
post #6 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-09-24, 11:10 AM Thread Starter
57
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Rogers, 9865 & 8300-eHDD, Sharp LC75N8000U, Denon AVR4310Ci; Sony KDL40W3000, 9865
Posts: 56,068
No, he was just getting his post count up last night, so he could be a member...

57's Home Theatre (Latest equipment & photos)
57 is offline  
post #7 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 09:55 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6
I just purchased an Sony SXRD tv, and for the money I spent on the TV I couldnt imagine going too cheap with the cords. I spent a lot of money on the component cables cords, but was able to pay only 2/3 of the cost.

After you talk down the price of the tv and you go to buy expensive cables be sure to negociate the price of them too.
leafsfan7524 is offline  
post #8 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 10:23 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lincoln.NB Pop 492,823
Posts: 6,434
I have Dollorama RCA cables and it was only $1.15. They do the same thing as Monster cables and guess what, I have spare money to buy the latest movie coming out on DVD.

Home Theatre: Yamaha HTR-6190, Klipsch Speakers, SANYO PLV-Z4, TOSHIBA HDDVD, LG BD555C, Cerwin Vega HTS12 Sub, VIP2300, XBox 360, HTPC.
Danster is offline  
post #9 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 10:27 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 11,101
Sorry to hear that leafsfan7524. I ask you this. When you bought a printer did you buy a premium USB or parallel cable? The thing is cable cost was never a real issue with PCs even analog RGB cables. You could shop around and find the best price. Why people think HDMI or DVI-D would be any different is beyond me. These same people often time will not have their set professionally calibrated so the logic of spending money to have the best picture just does not fly. Using dollar store video cables and a professional calibration would be better than $200 video cables and a non-professional calibration. My suggestion to new TV owners is if you feel the need to spend money, buy your cables for $30 and spend $270 for a professional calibration. You will get more bang for your buck.
Jake is offline  
post #10 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 10:32 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Saskatoon, Shaw Cable
Posts: 684
I used to buy Monster cable for 2 Reasons.

1) I read somewhere there was a "rule of thumb" that said you should spend about 10% of the cost of electronics on cables (ie $1500 TV = $150 cables)

2) I had no idea that #1 was a complete load of BS.

I always thought I was doing the right thing until DHC opened my eyes a long time ago.
Robobob is offline  
post #11 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 10:36 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North York (West Lansing), Toronto
Posts: 1,099
IMHO you need at least a decent quality of cable to insure the integrity of the component connections as well as quality of cabling. I use a relatively low-mid priced set of component cables (about $200) for my DVD connection but we are talking 35' runs here. It's the terminations that are the major part of the cost here.

As far as audio goes in my case it's a different story. I can hear differences between cables as I believe it's not only the electrical properties of the cable but also the electrical "match" or "synergy" of certain cables with individual components. In my system some sound “harsher” and “colder” while some models, from even the same manufacturer sound “smoother” and “warmer”. And no, if I had to spend the approx. $1200 mfsrp or so for each of the 3' audio interconnect sets I use I wouldn't be running out and buying them.

Last edited by Khorn; 2005-10-02 at 10:42 AM.
Khorn is offline  
post #12 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 12:32 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 564
I hate to keep posting this but...
One of the best posts I've read is below where the guy uses a coat hanger to get DD AC3:
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htfo...hreadid=157357

Also, I use the Red, White, Yellow composite cables that come with VCRs and the like for my component cables. I have a 120 inch screen and can't see a difference in PQ.

"Better" cables are a load of crap, and almost every electronics store makes their money by selling them. If you've ever bought an HDTV you will know that they really push Monster or other expensive cables telling you that you shouldn't buy an expensive system and cheap out on the cables.

At Wackys the guy actually became upset when a friend refused to buy cables from them. They gave him a great deal on the TV assuming they could get their money back on the cables. A good bargaining chip actually, just lead them into thinking you want the best cables and get a cheaper price on the TV and then reject the cables when you're at the cash. What are they going to do? Actually sir we gave you that price assuming we could gouge you on the cables.

Mitsubishi HC1500 projector, 3 FibreOp 2.0 HDTV receivers, Draper 120 inch screen, HD Media PC i7 920, ATI 4800 Radeon.

Last edited by JimmyFace; 2005-10-02 at 12:43 PM.
JimmyFace is offline  
post #13 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 02:41 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 222
Cool

.....it really depends on your own situation and environment.

Digtial domain cables, unless they are very long runs, probably will not benefit much from upgrade.

Analog cabling, be it interconnects for audio or video or speaker wire, can benefit
from a step up from 'zip-cord & coat-hangers'...particularly if they have to span long runs. Monster is a particularly poor brand, namely because many of their plugs are far too tight....i've pulled sockets out of compoents with Monster junk. To me, quality plugs on the IC's that are 'just right' for fit and won't loosen over time or repeated use can be pretty much most of the issue.....the same goes for good lockable bananas on speaker cable lengths. A good route to go are through the many online vendors that will build you custom cables with high quality components like Belden coax and Canare plugs at a fraction of the price that a 'cable boutique' would charge you for their latest smoke&mirrors brand. That's what iv'e done with IC's and i use 4 strand twisted speaker cabling due to some very long runs....just as some preventative maintainance
against picking up hums etc on 60' runs.

Integra Research RDC-7.1, Bryston 9B-SST, NHT vt2, vs2 & sw2, Sony 65XBR10w, Moto 6416iii, PS3-250, Sony BDP-s550
RigPig is offline  
post #14 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 04:40 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 384
I've had some problems with 'Dollar Store' S-video cables. I don't recommend them.

:-)
Jeffy is offline  
post #15 of 372 (permalink) Old 2005-10-02, 04:45 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake
Sorry to hear that leafsfan7524. I ask you this. When you bought a printer did you buy a premium USB or parallel cable? The thing is cable cost was never a real issue with PCs even analog RGB cables. You could shop around and find the best price. Why people think HDMI or DVI-D would be any different is beyond me. These same people often time will not have their set professionally calibrated so the logic of spending money to have the best picture just does not fly. Using dollar store video cables and a professional calibration would be better than $200 video cables and a non-professional calibration. My suggestion to new TV owners is if you feel the need to spend money, buy your cables for $30 and spend $270 for a professional calibration. You will get more bang for your buck.
Actually my printer sucks, so I couldnt imagine spending a lot on a cable. With the system I have now I purchased lesser quality cords in the past and had problems with them (mainly s-video)...Monster is guaranteed for life, so I know as long as the technology doesnt change i wont have to buy or worry about the quality of my picture in the future...for now im going to stick with my old optical cables, bc i dont think monster will be worth it, but with video for me i think it's the right choice

im not disagreeing with you, but im just saying it's probably the right choice for some people...if i spent $2000 on a tv i wouldnt but high end cables...ive dealt with being cheap on my system in the past and ive paid for it, whether it comes to buying an s-video cable or speaker wire

all i was saying is be sure not to pay full price for the cables
leafsfan7524 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome