Skinny Basic TV Discussions - Page 36 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums

 147Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #526 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-07, 08:38 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 422
As a person who's actually on a Skinny Basic plan, my main reasons are that I only watch the networks (with Eastern feeds because I like to be able to watch things earlier sometimes), plus a couple of specialties that vary on time of year as it's usually only for a show or two. I do get OTA channels, but it's nice to have a PVR and timeshifting available. In effect, the channels I want: CBC, CTV, CTV2, Global, City, and depending on time of year, Space, Showcase, CW. That's it. Everything else I watch is online.
Gilles is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #527 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-08, 09:25 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thornhill
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExDilbert View Post
I see the average customer for Skinny Basic as follows:
1. Lives too far away from a major city to get a good selection of OTA channels.
2. Lost 1 or more Canadian OTA channels during the digital transition. One of those was almost certainly the CBC with the next most likely being CTV.
3. Sick of repeated price hikes and gouging by BDUs.
4. Don't want overpriced "basic" packages that include dozens of unwanted, low quality channels or dozens of identical network channels.
5. Tired of paying for channels that are never watched because they milk the current TV packaging system by showing low quality content that mostly consists of endless reruns of the same content.
6. Tired of programming dilution by broadcasters spinning off unnecessary new channels that increase revenue for themselves while generating no value for BDU customers.
7. Don't mind waiting a year for a series to show up on a more affordable service such as Netflix.
One key factor overlooked is people in apartment/condo buildings who are not permitted to have OTA antennas, and this number is huge number.

I don't quite fall into the average consumer category for Skinny, but would like the option of selective channels at a lower overall price. My requirements are for a subset of the Skinny HD channels, plus TMN, TSN, and two or three specialty channels. I rarely watch live, and even then need the pause feature, so a PVR is a must. As a condo resident I am still searching for an ideal solution to my needs.
Bplayer is online now  
post #528 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-08, 09:57 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fort Erie, ON
Posts: 1,215
I watch a lot of "television" and switched to Skinny Basic immediately when Bell launched it in February - it weaned me off the specialty channels and I was finding the shows I watched on various sources on the internet (most times for free from the network's websites).

Eventually, I setup a good OTA setup with a OTA DVR - lost a couple channels I was getting in the Skinny Basic package, but gained more channels that were not in the line-up from Bell. Cancelled my subscription altogether now and pay nothing except for the odd show/movie that isn't free online.

I found the Skinny package a good step to see if I could live without a BDU - and it only took a few months to realize I didn't need anything.

At the end of the day, it's a personal choice to have this package and pay for it. Some of us drive Toyotas, some drive fancy Mercedes, and some of us use public transport - the BDU's supply us various options, and it is up to the individual consumer if they want to pay for it, or look at alternatives. The problem I have is that most areas don't have alternatives - for example, they are only limited to one cable company (why not have multiple companies compete?), or have no access to any cable company and are stuck with the satellite companies. If options were opened up (for example, you had a choice of 10 suppliers for TV service), prices would come down naturally with the competition.

I think the CRTC is going the wrong way around with this, and everything else it manages - they need to open up competition for TV, phone, cell, internet, etc. and stop allowing monopolies or duopolies in many communities in Canada.
Wheelman likes this.
Inglewood is online now  
 
post #529 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-08, 10:13 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 43° N, 81.2° W
Posts: 7,925
Quote:
but it's nice to have a PVR
It's not necessary to subscribe to skinny basic (or any BDU service) to get a PVR or DVR. OTA PVRs can be purchased and many people here have built their own, myself included. Done right, they are cheaper and more reliable than a proprietary PVR that must be purchased at full price with skinny basic.
Wheelman likes this.
ExDilbert is online now  
post #530 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-08, 12:49 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 422
True, and I considered that option, but I don't get all the networks I want OTA (or as reliably) given I can only have an indoor antenna in my apartment building.
Gilles is offline  
post #531 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-09, 04:45 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 14,921
Transcripts 2016 for the hearing have been posted. All paragraphs are numbered.

12 As of June 30th, 2016, 177,000 Canadians had signed up for the affordable basic service.

789 After less than seven months, we have almost 70,000 Limited TV subscribers on Shaw Cable and more than 16,000 on Shaw Direct.
Dr.Dave is offline  
post #532 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-09, 08:59 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
Skinny Basic and Set Top Boxes

I switched to skinny basic to save money by getting rid of the channels I never watch. However, I now have one TV that doesn't get used because it doesn't have a set top box (extra $$). It seems to me the simple solution would be to mandate that the Skinny Basic channels be broadcast in Clear QAM as just about every TV with an ATSC tuner can also receive Clear QAM off cable. This would not help for add on channels, a set top box would still be needed for those.
KjellM is offline  
post #533 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-09, 09:33 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 422
I don't think Clear QAM is possible on the IPTV systems, and they can't force some companies to do something they can't force everyone to.
Gilles is offline  
post #534 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-10, 11:17 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 43° N, 81.2° W
Posts: 7,925
Media devices, gaming consoles, Android or iOS devices and Smart TVs can do IPTV with an app. The technology is already in place with services like VOD, CraveTV and Shomi. All the large BDUs could do it.
ExDilbert is online now  
post #535 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-10, 12:02 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 422
Significantly more cost involved in doing that, but some of the larger BDUs are already doing it in some form with mobile apps and websites where you can watch TV live. To my knowledge, none have an app on TVs or TV-connected devices though. Some of the networks themselves allow streaming live feeds (with BDU authentication) to Chromecast or Apple TV from their respective mobile apps though. I know CTV and Global allow this.
Gilles is offline  
post #536 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-09-10, 12:49 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 43° N, 81.2° W
Posts: 7,925
I am not saying they could do it overnight. I am saying that, considering the infrastructure and technology already available, they could do it with minimal effort. Costs for internet streaming have gone down significantly in the past few years and will continue to fall. Before too long, it will be the cheapest way to deliver TV.
ExDilbert is online now  
post #537 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-12-21, 07:30 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stratford, PE.
Posts: 3,704
Latest notice from Bell. An increase of $3/month will be applied to Bell Satellite Services including Bell's Starter offering (their Skinny Basic) later this winter. I thought the CRTC had mandated the Skinny Basic cost to be a maximum of $25.00. Has Bell found a loophole or are they thumbing their nose at the CRTC and daring the CRTC to do something about the increase?
reidw is online now  
post #538 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-12-21, 08:03 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 14,921
@reidw double-check your source.

New residential rates – effective February 1, 2017.
Fibe and Satellite TV service (all packages, excluding Starter) +$3.00

Link: http://www.bell.ca/Residential_servi...7-PriceUpdates
Dr.Dave is offline  
post #539 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-12-22, 07:53 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stratford, PE.
Posts: 3,704
@Dr. D ave: Unfortunately I didn't keep the standalone email notice I received. It was not part of my monthly bill. It looks to me that what I read included a typo that has since been corrected or perhaps Bell was told by the CRTC that the price of the Starter pack couldn't be changed?
reidw is online now  
post #540 of 540 (permalink) Old 2016-12-22, 10:00 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 14,921
@reidw that link has been there for quite a while. It is mentioned on Bell's TV package page to give new customers a heads-up.
Dr.Dave is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome