![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Hi,
I'm looking into making a SBGH for a metro application here in Vancouver (thanks to Stampeder for pointing me in this direction). The idea would be to start without a reflector. In this situation, do I need to worry about grounding the antenna? For example, suppose I fasten the antenna arms (dipole?) to some treated wood and put it on my roof. I think the only ground required would be to use a coaxial grounding block near the antenna. Secondly, if I'm not using a reflector should I expect a change in performance based on what I secure the arms to? For instance, I could attach the arms to a 1" pvc mast, a 1x1 piece of wood, or a piece of 1/2" plywood that is 30cm wide. thanks! |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
shmish, what I would try is a simple standalone mount, sort of like how John SE Texas mounted a reflectorless SBGH beneath his VHF/UHF combo yagi (look closely at photo) in Post #642:
http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/show...&postcount=642 And you can see EGC's simple mount in Post #446 that you could adapt without a reflector: http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/show...&postcount=446 As for grounding, you'd run the coax from the antenna to where it enters your house, at which point it would connect through a ground block before entering, just as you said. Regarding the mast material, I believe 300ohm has counselled against the potential for moisture in wood, and with you living in Vancouver with all the rain we get I second that! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Thanks, that was pretty much what I was thinking. I could fasten some 1" pvc to the back of the wood (after weatherproofing the wood of course), and then fasten the pvc to the chimney.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Sorry if I'm a bit thick on this...
Quote:
lol, I think I'm having a hard time keeping my questions on-topic in the correct thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chair in front of the telly
Posts: 225
|
I found what 300ohm was saying by putting "wood moisture" into the Search This Thread tool. Moisture in wood interferes with signal.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Yes, that's what I got too along with the tip on styrofoam. I just want to make sure I understand the grounding issues.
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
|
Quote:
If you must use wood for the mast, then the cross strips should be a strong plastic. That can work out OK if you use a 90mm or so feedgap SBGH on the end of a two by board. Like stampeder said, the coax from all outdoor antennas need to be fed into a proper lightning arresting grounding block before going inside. Normally a metal mast would be grounded too, but with wood or plastic, there is nothing to ground.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Got it, thanks. I was also thinking about cutting some pieces of 1/4" hdpe from an old kitchen cutting board, and using this as standoffs from the wood.
cheers |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Hi,
For the 44mm width between the elements, is this the actual distance between the array elements, or would this be the theoretical distance between the elements if they were bent without any radius? Please see my picture below, it shows an exaggeration of the situation where the elements are bent with radius. It's not a huge difference but when we are trying to keep tolerances below 2mm, things add up pretty quick. Using 1/8" dia aluminum rod stock, I believe I was able to hand bend with 2mm radius. In hindsight, a hammer and clamp/vise would result in quite a tight bend. Perhaps that will be for next time. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
|
Quote:
Keep in perspective, the 2mm tolerance is so your antenna matches the model. If its out more than that, that doesnt mean the antenna wont work at all, but that it will work differently, for good or bad.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Here is some info on my temp build. It is reflectorless. The array is 1/8" Al round from Metal Supermarkets. The spine of the antenna is a piece of 3" western red cedar that I stained with polyurethane. Standoffs for the array were cut from an HDPE chopping board. The feedpoints (I don't know if that's the correct term) are connected with 1/4" brass screws. I've read about better compatibility with zinc or galvanized screws to match the aluminum array but I haven't (yet) found small plated screws. As well, the balun I purchased at Home Depot has really small spade terminals. The gap on the spade is 1/8" which means that really only a #4 brass screw will work. A #6 would will work if the spade fits in between the threads. I'm going to go to Rona tonight and see if they have a different balun or maybe I'll pick up smaller screws. I don't want to hack the spades unless I really need to, the balun is the most expensive part so far.
One issue that I didn't really think through is how narrow the wrc board is. I should have grabbed a wider plank from my scrap pile. As it stands, the feedgap is only 40mm. That's okay, I'll give it a try. I also cut some wider HDPE pieces. If I want, I can screw these to the wrc plank instead and have a much wider feedgap, up to 90mm. The other problem, of course, is that I need to sweep the floor and not take pictures of my socks. I'll update my progress probably later tonight once I get the balun sorted. First tests will be done indoors. Any suggestions on mounting to a chimney are appreciated. I'm planning on getting some 3/4" conduit that can mount to the back of the wrc, and then I can maybe use some clamps and concrete anchors to attach the conduit to the chimney. I found some nice looking clamps and straps on the web (via ebay) that I think would be great. The kit was only $10 but the darn shipping was $25 UPS, which means another $30 brokerage fee! |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: (Shaw) Victoria
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
Here's the link to the pic of the antenna(s) with straps: http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/c...8/162_6205.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: (Shaw) Victoria
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 71
|
Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I passed by the zinc screws... So I picked up some #6 screws, connected the antenna to my balun and tested it out inside (it was 10pm at this point). The SBGH seemed to have a stronger signal than a Silver Sensor clone I'm borrowing. I can't give too many details because I was having a lot of problems with the tv tuner.
Quote:
One thing I'm not sure of is the amount of contact needed at the feedpoints. The screw itself is not touching the array. The contact is from the aluminum rod to a large washer to the small washer, then to the screw head and down to the balun spade. I have no idea if this causes an issue in signal strength? Maybe this is a dumb question, but is this something that I could test with my multimeter, by measuring the ohms between the contact points (the al rod and the balun spade)? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|