![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the NHL allow a second Toronto-area team? | |||
| Yes |
|
23 | 44.23% |
| No |
|
23 | 44.23% |
| Don't know |
|
0 | 0% |
| Don't care |
|
6 | 11.54% |
| Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
It's back in the news again: today TSN and several other Canadian news web sites are running stories that claim certain unnamed NHL Governors have mentioned a league move to put a second team somewhere in the Toronto vicinity, probably involving Research in Motion (Blackberry) CEO Jim Balsillie:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=2532...s=secStory_nhl Meanwhile the Toronto Star is pouring water on it based on a Maple Leafs official's comments: http://www.thestar.com/Sports/article/521152 Last edited by stampeder; 2008-10-21 at 01:39 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver Island. Shaw cable.Sony 46V2500,DCT6416(w/TB Xpndr), PS3, Denon AVR2807, Paradigm spkrs.
Posts: 777
|
Another team for my Habs to beat is always ok in my books.
Seriously though, the idea is kind of ridiculous. If a city like LA, NYC or Detroit can't/won't have a 2nd NHL team then why does Toronto seem to think they can do it? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nepean, Ontario
Posts: 1,606
|
It would be nice to have another Canadian based team, but why not try to get a team back into one of the cities that lost their previous teams due to the way the NHL was run at the time?
Where would they put the team? Hamilton is out due to the proximity to Buffalo. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
We in North America have a strange taboo against second teams in most cities. Granted the really big cities/regions of New York and Los Angeles may have second football, basketball, baseball, and hockey teams, but generally all the others do not (Chicago has 2 baseball teams).
Throughout the world, cities of all sizes have more than 1 team in their major leagues. This is most true in football (soccer), with the City of London (yes, it is much bigger than Toronto) and its area having between 3 and 6 teams in the English Premier League depending on their performance each year. Similarly, Australia has several AFL teams in Melbourne that all do well at the turnstiles. I think a second NHL team in the Toronto area would do well, and the Leafs would not be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary, AB Shaw Exo
Posts: 4,811
|
I voted no. Hamilton should get one first.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
If the Leafs have an issue with Hamilton getting a team (and they do) then they certainly have an issue with this.
It would be an insult to Canadian hockey fans to put a second team in Toronto. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 699
|
Its a bigger insult to canadian Hockey fans that we only have 6 teams. Why do we need the NHL anyway. Canadians love hockey...take back the league form more teams and maybe we will "allow" Detroit and NY to join our League.
It is alot more insulting to me to have 2 teams in the state of Florida ![]() And 1 of those teams managed to win the Stanley cup. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 36
|
Did the NHL not learn that 2 wrongs does not make a right.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 3,895
|
Don't they need one NHL team before they get a second?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 299
|
No thanks. Hockey Night in Canada is already bad enough with the Toronto love. With a second Toronto team they might as well go ahead and just name their name to "Hockey Night in Toronto." Besides, there are markets that deserve a (second) chance at a team, like Winnipeg.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Burlington, Ontario (Cogeco Cable)
Posts: 1,172
|
More on a potential 2nd team in Toronto
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../National/home http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/...nto_expansion/ http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/...o_speculation/ Quote:
I do think a 2nd team in Toronto will succeed but I think this will not happen in years ... Why you ask? Cause the likely owner of this so called 2nd franchise will be Jim Balsillie and he has 0% interest in the Toronto market and he will not want to deal with sharing the ACC with the Leafs, plus parking, etc... and the whole Gary Bettman thing... if anything Balsillie will either move a team to Hamilton or Kitchener/Waterloo, before even thinking of putting a team in T.O. Heck why not put 4 teams in Toronto then, if your going to do that. BTW they better not go and award any city with a NHL franchise, cause the NHL is way to over-populated with teams as it stands. I agree with smootherator about having 1 and only 1 franchise in each city. If they really are wanting to relocate so badly then move Atlanta,Florida,Nashville or Phoenix to Winnipeg...They deserve another team. The Leafs are the Centre of the Hockey Universe and they must earn the Stanley Cup, not just given to them by getting a 2nd franchise. I highly doubt the Toronto Maple Leafs/Buffalo Sabres would allow this to happen, and same goes if Balsillie were to move a team to Hamilton, anyways that's just my two cents on this. Go Leafs Go ... Beat the Ducks Tonight!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Brunswick - Shaw Direct
Posts: 3,150
|
The more teams in Canada, and out of the southern US, the better.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 144
|
I vote no.
Let Winnipeg get the Jets back first, and let other cities like Hamilton have a team before Toronto gets a second team. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
One of the rationales suggested for a second NHL team in the Toronto area is that a struggling U.S. franchise could be kept alive that way.
So, with that in mind, it will be interesting to see whether any of the U.S. owners need to sell off their hockey team due to the economic crisis happening now... it may be just the right time for Canadian cities to pick the lowest hanging fruit to bring to Quebec City, Winnipeg, Hamilton (and maybe even Halifax if a new rink could be built). Remember that when the Calgary Flames relocated from Atlanta they played for quite awhile in the old Stampede Corral while the Saddledome was being designed and built, so it is possible that NHL teams could move right into Canadian rinks that might not initially meet NHL standards. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 256
|
While I'm not sure that Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment would agree to a second team in its territory without substantial compensation (read: Payoff) I think it is an inevitability of a second NHL franchise somewhere in the GTA simply because of all the US based teams that are struggling to stay afloat as we speak in 'false hockey markets'
While I would love to see teams returned to Winnpeg and Quebec City, I don't know if the corporate dollars are there to support teams in those markets... NefCanuck |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|