![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#181 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 93
|
@the.importer
Crtc has nothing to do with antenna regulation. This is the role of Industry Canada and a exclusive federal juridiction. Municipal power try to block cell phone antenna tower all the times, but they always loses. The same apply to TV antenna, but who would go to court for that ? |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#182 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 5,089
|
IC also has nothing to do with this, as you agree to the condo by-laws when you buy. The options are either change the by-laws or get the feds to pass a law over-riding the condo by-laws.
|
|
|
|
|
#183 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 93
|
I was talking about municipal rules not the condo situation.
But I think the case of the condo could be in in court because a private contract between to parties cannot include clauses that are not valid according to another law. |
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 761
|
There is NO such thing as "encrypted FTA" since FTA represents the reception of UNENCRYPTED satellite signals as we discuss in the Free To Air forum on this site. You probably were referring to satellite piracy which many pirates use FTA as a euphemism to avoid admitting their are doing something illegal.
|
|
|
|
|
#185 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: GTA
Posts: 11
|
Bit of an old thread, but google sent me here.
Im trying to find an answer to why stations broadcast their signal to "us" for free? Why don't they just use cable/satellite? Wouldn't it be cheaper and less towers/power being pushed around? Whenever I talk to ppl about ota, that's usually the first thing they ask me, and i never have an answer. |
|
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Rogers, 8300HD, eHDD, Panasonic TCP65S1, Denon AVR4310Ci; 8300HD, eHDD & Sony KDL40W3000
Posts: 50,347
|
Because all TV used to be OTA and if they didn't "broadcast" they'd lose 10-20-30% of their market depending on the location. There would also be an outcry if people were forced to subscribe to cable/satellite - some don't have access, others can't afford it, etc.
__________________
57's Home Theatre (Latest equipment & photos) 57's Optimization Services (Home Theatre Optimization) |
|
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: St-Eustache, Qc
Posts: 180
|
Because generalist tv stations are supposed to be free. Their CRTC license force them to do so.
Not everybody have the $$$ to pay cable companies. General tv channels are supposed to be free, like 30 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
#188 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St Catharines
Posts: 992
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 5,089
|
^^^^
Actually, it's closer to 60 years. IIRC, the CBC started broadcasting TV in 1952 and before that, those in border areas could receive U.S. stations. For example, WBEN, Buffalo could be received in the Toronto area from May 1948. Broadcast TV in the U.S. started before WW2 or more than 70 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Scarboro
Posts: 5,578
|
The by-laws would be quite different for each municipality. The Toronto by-law is here http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/bylaws...6-volume-1.pdf. If you search for antenna you will find several hits pertaining to height, (an antenna may exceed the max height by a max of 5m) and also pertaining to rear year and side yard setbacks, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#191 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 659
|
So folks, I called the city and spoke to a zoning officer, here is the response
"As long as the antenna is not for commercial purposes, YOU ARE FINE TO PUT UP AN ANTENNA" Reference: Zoning Law 76-26 Section 5(A) city of Kingston building department |
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 4,113
|
I've mentioned this before, and it's worth repeating:
Always ask the city or municipality about bylaws and building codes regarding your specific address. In some communities, these rules can vary by address. For example, an older part of town may allow towers and antennas, while a new subdivision may not. Also, get details on any restrictions that may exist. For example, at my address in Kitchener, I'm permitted to erect a non-commercial tower structure up to 200'. But this structure may not be in a side yard if I'm on a corner lot, and it can't be in a front yard. Some jurisdictions may require permits, or proof that the install has been inspected by a structural engineer.
__________________
DMX 68' tower, HyGain HAM 5 rotator, Antennas Direct 91-XG & C5, Channel Master 7777 preamp, Siemens surge protection |
|
|
|
|
#193 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 78
|
Putting a naked antenna out on a balcony is just begging for confrontation.
Solution? When does as antenna not look like an antenna? When its covered. How you do it, is for you to mastermind, just ensure it is not a metallic cover. As far as a sat dish not sure how much transparency you need since even rain affects the signal. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
|
Confrontation is good. Bring it on. Read the Competition Act.
Last edited by Jase88; 2012-09-15 at 08:10 PM. Reason: Unnecessary quote |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|