Bitove's HDTV OTA Network Denied - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Digital Industry Forums > Television Industry / Channels and Providers

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2008-04-03, 12:11 PM   #1
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,501
Default Bitove's HDTV OTA Network Denied

Press release issued this morning

Quote:
HDTV Networks Inc. confirmed today that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has denied its application for a broadcasting licence to launch Canada's first free national over-the-air high-definition (HD) network based out of Vancouver, British Columbia.

HDTV Networks Inc. thanks the CRTC for reviewing and considering its
application.
for background see the CRTC Reviewing Proposed HD OTA Network for Canada discussion thread
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2008-04-03, 12:15 PM   #2
99gecko
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 2,534
Default

Quote:
OTTAWA-GATINEAU — The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) today denied HDTV Networks Inc.'s (HDTV Networks) application for a licence to operate a national, English-language high-definition conventional television service.

“HDTV Networks sought to launch a television station that would be the Canadian equivalent of a superstation,” said Michel Arpin, the CRTC's Vice-Chairman of Broadcasting. “The programming strategy associated with such a station is inconsistent with the objectives of the Broadcasting Act and the Commission's policies. We have never granted a licence for such a conventional television station in the past and did not find any compelling reason to do so at this time.”

The requirement to make local programming available to audiences is an integral feature of the CRTC's conventional television policy. HDTV Networks would only commit to providing two hours of local programming per week in each of the eight markets it wanted to serve: Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax. By way of comparison, existing conventional stations offer on average more than 22 hours of local programming per week.

The Commission also found that HDTV Networks' proposal was inconsistent with its policies governing the distribution of digital television signals. The applicant requested that cable and satellite companies distribute its television signal in both analog and digital formats. Such an arrangement would not further the Commission's objective to support the transition from analog to digital broadcasting and distribution.

In addition, the CRTC today denied YES TV Inc.'s application for a licence to operate an English-language high-definition conventional television service in the Greater Toronto Area. The Commission was not convinced that the applicant could fulfill its programming commitments, among other things.

Today's decisions follow a public process that included a public hearing, which was held on February 12 and 13, 2008.
http://crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisi.../db2008-75.htm

Last edited by hugh; 2008-04-03 at 12:34 PM.
99gecko is offline  
Old 2008-04-03, 09:42 PM   #3
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,240
Default

CBC Article on decision.
http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/04/03/hdtv-crtc.html
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2008-04-03, 09:54 PM   #4
blakew
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yonge & Sheppard, Toronto
Posts: 387
Default

Weak! The CRTC decsion is laughable, and oh so predictible. Proof that Shaw, Bell, Rogers, Telus and other Canadian telecommunication co's/BDU's have a louder voice than the Canadian public.

Denying HD Networks' applications because it would be deemed too much like a superstation? Hello, the very companies happy with this decision are the ones providing American superstations to millions of Canadian's television sets. The existance of a free to view superstation (in digital no less) would hurt business. Oh, and just incase you forgot, you pay GST on your BDU subscriptions, so don't think the goverment is your friend when it comes to getting free HD over-the-air. The feds wouldn't make a dime from viewers watching Bitove's OTA networks. And with heavy hitters in the other corner, are you really surprised with today's result?
__________________
Sony 32XBR1, Antennas Direct CS2, Xbox360 & BD. Gamertag: "DT Vancity" <-- get it, DTV?
blakew is offline  
Old 2008-04-03, 10:48 PM   #5
scrooloose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grimsby, Ont.
Posts: 3,121
Default

Frankly I'm not disappointed. There just isn't enough HD content for another network.

-Mike
__________________
Pioneer PRO-110FD | Pioneer VSX-92TXH | BELL 9242 | Panasonic DMP-BD35 | XBOX 360 |WD TV Live Hub
scrooloose is online now  
Old 2008-04-04, 01:01 AM   #6
kingsford90
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Montreal - Videotron
Posts: 145
Default

"By way of comparison, existing conventional stations offer on average more than 22 hours of local programming per week."

I assume this just means local news. Fill an hour at 6 with 5 minutes of news and everybody is happy.

Albeit not a great day for more choice for the consumer, I doubt it would have ever happened anyway even if Bitove got the license. How could it possibly have made any money?
kingsford90 is offline  
Old 2008-04-04, 04:21 PM   #7
SensualPoet
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Downtown Toronto • Toshiba 52XL177 • HD DVD Toshiba • Rogers HDPVR Cisco 8642
Posts: 2,886
Default

The press release from the Bitove folks sounded almost relieved. I'm more interested in seeing HD on existing Canadian channels than on a new series of OTA HD. Hello, CTV? Nightly News? CFTO News?
SensualPoet is offline  
Old 2008-04-06, 04:09 PM   #8
foxfan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal/Ottawa
Posts: 1,022
Default

So many existing Canadian stations have out-of-core DTV allocations. Priority should be given to complete the transition and move them in-core before thinking of opening new stations.

Remember, the DTV transition is all about spectrum, not perdy pictures in HD.
foxfan is offline  
Old 2008-04-06, 04:53 PM   #9
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,501
Default

Quote:
The press release from the Bitove folks sounded almost relieved.
I think they realized they didn't have a chance in he double hockey sticks so they didn't want to alienate the CRTC with a negative announcement.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2008-04-06, 06:37 PM   #10
bigoranget
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,029
Default

Frankly I'm glad this license got denied. It would have set precedent to allow current stations to reduce their local programming to nothing. With all of the consolidation that has gone on over the years, this is the last thing Canadian Television needs.
bigoranget is online now  
Old 2008-04-06, 08:56 PM   #11
roger1818
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,680
Default

I have mixed feelings about this. It would have been nice to have another station available, but I was concerned about the lack of local programming. Approval of this application would likely have given the existing stations permission to reduce if not eliminate the minimal amount of local programming they provide even further.
roger1818 is offline  
Old 2008-04-07, 09:31 AM   #12
scampbell
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Port Carling, Ontario
Posts: 815
Default

>>>"By way of comparison, existing conventional stations offer on average more than 22 hours of local programming per week."<<<

I wonder how the 2 hours of local programming promised by the new network compares to the number of hours of local HD programming offered by conventional stations.
scampbell is offline  
Old 2008-04-07, 07:37 PM   #13
roger1818
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scampbell
I wonder how the 2 hours of local programming promised by the new network compares to the number of hours of local HD programming offered by conventional stations.
Not all of the programming was promised to be in HD (the application said they were going to up-convert programs that weren't available in HD). Likely the local programming would be in upconverted SD.
roger1818 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.