![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
The folks at Slingmedia were nice enough to send me a Slingbox Pro which is HD ready for review.
I hope to set it up in coming days and review the unit. If you have questions, I will try to answer them. Hugh |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Setup of this device was very straightforward.
Once it was physically connected, I installed the Slingbox software. Went through a wizard asking what my source was, checked my source, setup a password and an admin password etc. The installation software also updated the firmware on my box and then I was set to go. I hooked up the software to both a wireless computer (my laptop) and a wired computer so I could see what the difference is like. So far so good.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,190
|
I see from the link your provided they don't package an HD cable and it looks like it is proprietary. They must be figuring not a lot of users are going to be using the HD capabilities. Is that true? I only ask because even 480P widescreen would be nice out of the box for all those widescreen TVs we have.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Yes to both questions. I was really surprised at this.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario (Rogers)
Posts: 1,521
|
I personally don't see a need for the HD-connect. I have my 8300HD hooked up to the S-video input/output, and it looks great when viewing remotely. Unless you want to view in Full screen, I don't think you'll see much of a difference between HD and S-video, and I don't think it increases the transmission rate, so I doubt you'd be getting HD in any event.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
|
Just got a Slingbox PRO on a 30-day trial - and also surprised by lack of the cable which would indeed match the marketing of an "HD" unit (and enable thorough testing).
Installation was pretty straight forward - especially liked the firmware update being integrated into setup - and picture quality is decent. For a networkable unit, biggest surprise is the access restriction to one user at a time. With help file screenshots of multiple "Slingboxes" residing on a network, this would clearly be an expensive solution to implement within homes where resident spouses travel independently, or family/roomers include two or more remote viewers. Maybe another use for Terminal Server or PC Anywhere(?) Biggest personal challenge is a local one. The set-top digital cable box Look provides (an RCA TRD04M3C) isn't recognized by Slingmedia's IR controller, and a couple hours on the 'net have proven fruitless. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
After using this a few times, I agree with Larry. The picture quality is pretty good but the limitation is going to be more a function of bandwidth than the cable.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
|
Agree that the lack of an HD cable wouldn't necessarily be an issue - if of the three remaining input "channels", there was more than one SVHS input available.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 662
|
I have a question regarding the PRO, on the lower right hand corner of the Slingplayer software you will see the "throughput" of the video stream... you might have to click on it to show kbps rather than fps. On the local network (LAN not over the internet), what are you guys getting? I am just wondering how it compares with the classic Slingbox... I get about 2000 kbps on the LAN.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Beloeil,Quebec
Posts: 73
|
I was wondering what were the biggest diff between the classic and the new line of Slingboxes. The classic are quite cheap on ebay and I was wondering if it was worth it to pull the trigger on one.
Patrick S. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Quote:
Haven't tested but I doubt it would be any higher if you're watching away from home
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 846
|
I get around about 2000+ Kbps on my network at home, using an original Slingbox 'Classic'.
On the road I've found it's highly dependent on the bandwidth available at the place I'm using it, which varies wildly. Some hotels I've been lucky to get 200 Kbps, and the picture quality reflects that. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Shaw Digital HD Plus, 3416 & Expander
Posts: 6,313
|
So I could theoretically set this up to an HD source in the US and watch everything in (somewhat) HD on my computer/big screen in Canada?
__________________
SHAW 2012 HD Count: +8 (51 Total not counting SC or SNETWorld) |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 662
|
I haven't gotten my hands on the PRO yet but the biggest difference appears to be the picture quality over the Local Area Network (LAN). Over the internet the quality is limited by your connection's upload speeds anyways so the Classic and the PRO will probably have similar PQ.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Hugh - is your Slingbox on a Gig LAN? Jeff |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|