Slingbox Pro Review and Discussion Thread - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Consumer Electronics and Home Computing > Home Theatre Personal Computer (HTPC) and Media Extenders

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2007-03-24, 05:52 PM   #1
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default Slingbox Pro Review and Discussion Thread

The folks at Slingmedia were nice enough to send me a Slingbox Pro which is HD ready for review.

I hope to set it up in coming days and review the unit.

If you have questions, I will try to answer them.

Hugh
hugh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2007-03-26, 07:40 AM   #2
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

Setup of this device was very straightforward.
  • First, I unpacked the box.
  • Hooked up S-Video and Audio in from my PVR to the Slingbox. (could have hooked up a second input but did not)
  • Hooked up Ethernet cable to my router
  • Hooked up IR to my PVR
  • Plugged the power in

Once it was physically connected, I installed the Slingbox software. Went through a wizard asking what my source was, checked my source, setup a password and an admin password etc. The installation software also updated the firmware on my box and then I was set to go.

I hooked up the software to both a wireless computer (my laptop) and a wired computer so I could see what the difference is like.

So far so good.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2007-03-26, 09:15 AM   #3
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,190
Default

I see from the link your provided they don't package an HD cable and it looks like it is proprietary. They must be figuring not a lot of users are going to be using the HD capabilities. Is that true? I only ask because even 480P widescreen would be nice out of the box for all those widescreen TVs we have.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2007-03-26, 09:37 AM   #4
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

Yes to both questions. I was really surprised at this.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2007-03-26, 02:32 PM   #5
Larry
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario (Rogers)
Posts: 1,521
Default

I personally don't see a need for the HD-connect. I have my 8300HD hooked up to the S-video input/output, and it looks great when viewing remotely. Unless you want to view in Full screen, I don't think you'll see much of a difference between HD and S-video, and I don't think it increases the transmission rate, so I doubt you'd be getting HD in any event.
Larry is offline  
Old 2007-04-02, 11:18 AM   #6
TurnItOnAgain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
Default

Just got a Slingbox PRO on a 30-day trial - and also surprised by lack of the cable which would indeed match the marketing of an "HD" unit (and enable thorough testing).

Installation was pretty straight forward - especially liked the firmware update being integrated into setup - and picture quality is decent.

For a networkable unit, biggest surprise is the access restriction to one user at a time. With help file screenshots of multiple "Slingboxes" residing on a network, this would clearly be an expensive solution to implement within homes where resident spouses travel independently, or family/roomers include two or more remote viewers.

Maybe another use for Terminal Server or PC Anywhere(?)

Biggest personal challenge is a local one. The set-top digital cable box Look provides (an RCA TRD04M3C) isn't recognized by Slingmedia's IR controller, and a couple hours on the 'net have proven fruitless.
TurnItOnAgain is offline  
Old 2007-04-02, 11:22 AM   #7
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

After using this a few times, I agree with Larry. The picture quality is pretty good but the limitation is going to be more a function of bandwidth than the cable.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 01:08 AM   #8
TurnItOnAgain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
Default

Agree that the lack of an HD cable wouldn't necessarily be an issue - if of the three remaining input "channels", there was more than one SVHS input available.
TurnItOnAgain is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 08:37 AM   #9
cyclo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 662
Default

I have a question regarding the PRO, on the lower right hand corner of the Slingplayer software you will see the "throughput" of the video stream... you might have to click on it to show kbps rather than fps. On the local network (LAN not over the internet), what are you guys getting? I am just wondering how it compares with the classic Slingbox... I get about 2000 kbps on the LAN.
cyclo is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 08:55 AM   #10
sansp00
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Beloeil,Quebec
Posts: 73
Default

I was wondering what were the biggest diff between the classic and the new line of Slingboxes. The classic are quite cheap on ebay and I was wondering if it was worth it to pull the trigger on one.
Patrick S.
sansp00 is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 09:20 AM   #11
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

Quote:
I am just wondering how it compares with the classic Slingbox... I get about 2000 kbps on the LAN
Seems to me I have seen it as high as 5700 but I'll check again. Don't know if it would be higher with HD.

Haven't tested but I doubt it would be any higher if you're watching away from home
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 07:01 PM   #12
WestCDA
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 846
Default

I get around about 2000+ Kbps on my network at home, using an original Slingbox 'Classic'.

On the road I've found it's highly dependent on the bandwidth available at the place I'm using it, which varies wildly. Some hotels I've been lucky to get 200 Kbps, and the picture quality reflects that.
WestCDA is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 07:28 PM   #13
JesseJ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Shaw Digital HD Plus, 3416 & Expander
Posts: 6,313
Default

So I could theoretically set this up to an HD source in the US and watch everything in (somewhat) HD on my computer/big screen in Canada?
__________________
SHAW 2012 HD Count: +8 (51 Total not counting SC or SNETWorld)
JesseJ is offline  
Old 2007-04-03, 09:22 PM   #14
cyclo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sansp00 View Post
I was wondering what were the biggest diff between the classic and the new line of Slingboxes. The classic are quite cheap on ebay and I was wondering if it was worth it to pull the trigger on one.
Patrick S.
I haven't gotten my hands on the PRO yet but the biggest difference appears to be the picture quality over the Local Area Network (LAN). Over the internet the quality is limited by your connection's upload speeds anyways so the Classic and the PRO will probably have similar PQ.
cyclo is offline  
Old 2007-04-05, 03:07 AM   #15
TurnItOnAgain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TO
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclo View Post
On the local network (LAN not over the internet), what are you guys getting? I am just wondering how it compares with the classic Slingbox... I get about 2000 kbps on the LAN.
Getting roughly 2150 Kb/s when viewing a digital cable signal in stereo via coax connected over a Fast Ethernet LAN intranet.

Hugh - is your Slingbox on a Gig LAN?



Jeff
TurnItOnAgain is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.