![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,727
|
Now that XM and Sirius are in Canada, I would be glad to see CHUM come up with subscription radio service too and hope the CRTC allows them the right to carry less CanCon. I for sure would gladly dump my Sirius subscription for another sevice with half the channels and better sound quality. XM's and Sirius' sound sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Victoria BC Canada
Posts: 578
|
Yes, it is nice to see they may still be in the game. If they don't get sucked into the low bandwith/high stream numbers they would be capable of very good sound. This may also put competative pressure on the sat companies to try to increase their sound quality.
__________________
Bev 9200 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Posts: 72
|
Remember everyone, CHUM tried very hard to scuttle satellite radio in Canada. Do you really want to support them?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
I would support Chum because, as Hornhonker suggests, competition is good.
Chum, in their defence played by the rules. They didn't try and cheat anyone, they fought the battle and lost. Honestly after John Bitoves 475 million dollar payday, maybe we all lost!
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,727
|
Not all, only those who buy XM Canada shares
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
true Arthur - true.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bolton, ON
Posts: 643
|
So CHUM was/is serious about going ahead with their service? I thought it was just a ploy to keep XM & Sirius out.
What types of radios would this service require? Would they be using terrestrial antennas to broadcast? Would they be launching a service comparible to Clear Channel in the US? Would they be bound by language/content laws? I could see people in larger cities going this route if it meant they got better reception and quality than AM/FM radio but for all of us out in the boonies I think satellite would still be superior. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Mark, Chum was serious but they said they would ONLY go ahead if satellite radio was NOT approved. I think they truly believed the government would not allow satellite radio in this country and frankly the laws, even as they stand today, suggest that the use of U.S. satellites to deliver the signals is illegal.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 297
|
Quote:
I actually quite like this idea simply because it uses existing "open" standards rather the closed-vertically integratted model that SIrius/XM use. At least in theory if you were to buy one of these "Chum" radios and it actually spurred a lot of new 3rd party conventional DAB stations in your city, you wouldn't be left with a useless radio if Chum's service suddenly went away. If Chum kept the bitrate high and emphasized sound quality (basically the opposite of what Sirius and XM do), then I'd consider getting a subscription to their service. Last edited by mcpish; 2005-12-15 at 11:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kincardine ON.
Posts: 3,944
|
What types of radios would this service require? Likely DAB radios. Would they be using terrestrial antennas to broadcast? In the beginning, yes, and at that likely only in urban centres. Eventually, I think E-147 is satallite compatible, but Chum would have to have a deep-pocketed partner to accomplish that. Would they be launching a service comparible to Clear Channel in the US? Don't get. Clear Channel does not have pay multichannel service that could be comparable to what Chum intends to offer, at least to my knowlege. Would they be bound by language/content laws? Definately, since Chum will be in 100% control of the platform (unlike the current satellite providers, which are piggybacking on the US service), and what channels are avaliable. I could see people in larger cities going this route if it meant they got better reception and quality than AM/FM radio but for all of us out in the boonies I think satellite would still be superior. That is the rub with the Chum proposal, little or no timely rural coverage. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 940
|
I wish CHUM has partnered with XM....both would have benefitted.
I live in the country and CHUM does not give a ---- about rural Canada, hence, I do not give a ---- about CHUM.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: XM channel 230
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
I would love to have a license to offer service to thirty million people. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|