![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#61 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gatineau Quebec
Posts: 203
|
Well, to tell you the truth, I paid more for my remote than I paid for my receiver (a Yamaha RXV-2500 which was pretty decent at the time). What can I say, you would love it.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gatineau Quebec
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
|
The URCMX3000 is tops. Though I did have to spring for a new battery at one point - - a little sooner than I wanted too do.
-P |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MB
Posts: 1,788
|
I have a Boston A7RC (A Pronto NEO/TSU-501 on steroids), as well as two very long-in-the-tooth URC MX-500's, I bought the Boston, thinking I'd like the touchscreen and the ability to draw my own screens on the computer, transfer them to the remote and define the functions... But it seems I can't stand touchscreens afterall.
I have absolutely nothing bad to say of the MX-500's, they are still an astounding programmable learning remote.
__________________
I'm a sleep expert. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|