![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: York, Ontario
Posts: 2,374
|
Here's why.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2002Oct22.html I've noticed this for the last couple of weeks actually with DNS servers timing out, etc but that could have been something else |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 390
|
So, it wasn't just my connection that slowed down!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 661
|
Maybe everyone just happened to be downloading movies and mp3s at that time
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Uxbridge, ON
Posts: 3,589
|
No, it was slow because you didn't buy your neighbourhood and cable internet is shared access!!
Sorry, I got caught up in DSL marketing for a minute there. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
this attack seems to have only been Monday 5 to 6 PM EDT.
It seems to me that a lot of companies and educational systems need to patch the problems that allow the attackers to launch the attacks. I see a class action suit coming out of all this as companies will start to sue those companies and institutions that don't properly protect their servers. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
I switched from ADSL to cable and find cable to be 2.5 times faster.
I ran benchmarks that proved it. Of course, ADSL now comes in many flavours. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Rogers, 8300HD, eHDD, Panasonic TCP65S1, Denon AVR4310Ci; 8300HD, eHDD & Sony KDL40W3000
Posts: 50,302
|
James: ADSL is typically slower for me too (I've got both available to me), but it's more consistent. Cable is typically faster, but can sometimes be a bit slow during congested times and depending on who else is on your "block".
"Testing" is a bit strange. I've run many tests over almost 4 years and the results vary quite a bit, depending on which "test site", which server, etc. Most times it's the internet site you go to that is the limitation, not your connection speed. Believe it or not, your computer's processor speed and RAM can also have an effect on some "graphics intensive" sites.
__________________
57's Home Theatre (Latest equipment & photos) 57's Optimization Services (Home Theatre Optimization) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burlington
Posts: 24,791
|
I have tested the performance several time, during different times of day with similiar results. I was basically using 2 different web sites to test. The first was the one provided to me by sympatico and the second was provided by Cogeco.
Perhaps the neighbours don't have cable access. Anyway, back to the original topic, i posted a link over at the internet forum dealing with the same issue. That thread is locked. I just assumed that putting an internet related thread in a internet forum made sense :lol: |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Scarb
Posts: 2,781
|
Ya it did, but this one had all the traffic so I locked yours. Sorry! :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: York, Ontario
Posts: 2,374
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|