Class action lawsuit targets cellphone 'access' fees - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Consumer Electronics and Home Computing > Smartphone and Tablet Computing including Android, Blackberry and iOS devices

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2004-10-31, 11:49 AM   #1
dc
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Default Class action lawsuit targets cellphone 'access' fees

Canada's four biggest cellphone carriers could lose their operating licences if a new class-action lawsuit proves they've misled customers about an add-on fee.
dc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2006-08-14, 12:49 AM   #2
denben73
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Timmins, ON
Posts: 842
Default Nearly two years later........

Whatever happened to this? I'm just wondering since someone brought it up in conversation a few days ago and I had forgotten all about it. I do remember it making the nighttime newscasts that night and was a big story.
denben73 is online now  
Old 2006-08-14, 12:54 AM   #3
denben73
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Timmins, ON
Posts: 842
Default Oopppssss......

NOW I find the info I was looking for......

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewa...s.html?ref=rss

Sorry for the trouble.
denben73 is online now  
Old 2006-08-15, 12:12 AM   #4
Paolo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regional Municipality of Durham
Posts: 2,713
Default

yeah man, read up on it on hofo, it was thrown out.
Paolo is offline  
Old 2006-08-15, 11:10 AM   #5
kenw
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 158
Default

The article states that they would try to submit another suit based on the judge's remarks. Did they do so, and what happened to the second suit?
__________________
Ken
kenw is offline  
Old 2006-08-15, 06:49 PM   #6
BillMinRegina
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 75
Default

I wonder if these lawsuits over system access fees are the reason that Bell Mobility is raising their system access fee from 6.95 /mo to 8.95 /mo?
BillMinRegina is offline  
Old 2006-08-15, 09:37 PM   #7
dc
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Default

No, I don't think that's the reason. I'd just attribute it to simple GREED.
dc is offline  
Old 2006-09-21, 06:47 AM   #8
DigitalCanadian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 178
Default

unbelievable, that's 28% increase of system access fee.

what else in our daily life that increases 28% without an outcry?
DigitalCanadian is offline  
Old 2006-09-21, 11:47 AM   #9
Mexicanuck
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalCanadian View Post
unbelievable, that's 28% increase of system access fee.

what else in our daily life that increases 28% without an outcry?
Real estate.

In fact, in another thread here, people are gloating about increases in excess of 28%.

At least the people who are owners are pleased, as are the mobile phone companies.
__________________
"Don't quote me on this." - Anonymous
Mexicanuck is offline  
Old 2006-11-10, 10:23 PM   #10
drewber23
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 112
Default

Just to clarify the saf is charged to cover system upgrades like the evdo technology that bell and telus currently have...and for rogers the saf covers new towers and technology like the HSDPA network that is rolling out nationwide in Febuary. Just to note you also pay digital access fees with cable companies, satalitte providers, hydro companies charge massively for taxes and hydro plant upgrades and home phone companies also charges SAF fees though most of them hide it in their monthly prices.
drewber23 is offline  
Old 2006-11-10, 10:50 PM   #11
Walter Dnes
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vaughan, Ontario (near Dufferin and Steeles)
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drewber23 View Post
Just to note you also pay digital access fees with cable companies, satalitte providers, hydro companies charge massively for taxes and hydro plant upgrades and home phone companies also charges SAF fees though most of them hide it in their monthly prices.
In plain English, they're being honest and quoting the true cost to you up front. You only have to pay PST on top of their bill. The phone companies advertise $25 per month entry-level plans. Then you get your bill and you find an extra $8.75/month "access fee" plus a 75 cent "911 fee". That used to be called outright lying in a more moral time. There's no problem with advertising and charging $34.50 a month plus PST. It's when you advertise $25/month plus PST, and charge $34.50 a month plus PST, that people get pissed off.
Walter Dnes is offline  
Old 2006-11-11, 04:24 PM   #12
Nemnoch
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Dnes View Post
In plain English, they're being honest and quoting the true cost to you up front. You only have to pay PST on top of their bill. The phone companies advertise $25 per month entry-level plans. Then you get your bill and you find an extra $8.75/month "access fee" plus a 75 cent "911 fee". That used to be called outright lying in a more moral time. There's no problem with advertising and charging $34.50 a month plus PST. It's when you advertise $25/month plus PST, and charge $34.50 a month plus PST, that people get pissed off.
actually, Bell Mobility did that a year ago. They offered plans that were an 'All in One Plan' Problem was, customer's thought the plans were more money than the competitors, even though they weren't, so with a loss of business, the plans were retired.

nem, who says sometimes when you give 'em what they want, they still complain
__________________
The preceding post and all opinions expressed are solely those of the poster and do not reflect the opinions of any other person or business
Nemnoch is offline  
Old 2006-11-12, 01:36 AM   #13
ken0042
Premium Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemnoch View Post
nem, who says sometimes when you give 'em what they want, they still complain
I know what you mean. I've been comparing cell phone plans, and people ask me how much I pay. I tell them my Telus bill is $45, and they tell me they are only paying $20 on (insert company name here.) I then ask them how much their monthly bills are; and they reply that they don't know.

Unfortunately most of us here on DHC are above average consumers as far as scrutinizing our service and bills.
__________________
"There are 10 types of people in this world; those who understand binary and those who don't."
ken0042 is offline  
Old 2006-11-14, 09:37 AM   #14
David Susilo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: in my home theatre
Posts: 3,418
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mexicanuck View Post
Real estate.

In fact, in another thread here, people are gloating about increases in excess of 28%.

At least the people who are owners are pleased, as are the mobile phone companies.
My house price have gone up by $100k in the past 6 years (that's close to 40%) and I for one am pissed about this. I have no plan in selling my house, yet I'm paying more and more property tax.

So yeah, back to topic, what's going on with the SAF and number portation from one carrier to the next?
__________________
THX, ISF, Control4 Certified Professional; CEDIA Trainer
David Susilo is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.