![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#31 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
|
Great thanks. I'll look into and see how it works out for me. When it come to the sales rep - I'll be strong ;-)
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#32 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
|
I'm surprised that there isn't more protest about this?? I mean, if the private broadcaster turned off, I'd be upset.. When public broadcaster turns off, I'm angry.. Fired off a letter to Tony Clement and the local Metroland group Cottagecountrynow.ca C'mon, 85,000 people in Parry Sound - Muskoka isn't worth it?? GLOBAL switched over their stick that covers most of the area...
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
It would be good to see the CBC continue to broadcast in the London area (but switch to digital, of course). Even with the $115M funding cut, the CBC is still given about $1B annually.. I think I'd look forward more to seeing the CBC broadcasted on a x.1 OTA channel, and use a x.2 subchannel for CBCNN. Both broadcasting at 720p. Just wishful thinking...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wayne, MI (between Ann Arbor and Detroit)
Posts: 251
|
Perhaps someone wants to start up a private CBC affiliate in London? I know the CBC has been weeding those out, but you never know.
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SW Riverdale, Toronto
Posts: 17
|
They could use the sub-channel to broadcast CBC French. Its viewing audience isn't that great that it really requires its own channel.
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
|
Someone should suggest a story to CBC marketplace. Tom Harrington could inform the public that they have options available and also expose the lies that the cable companies are deliberately spreading...
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
**EDIT** here was his response: Thanks for the idea E-mail more details. marketplace@cbc.ca **EDIT Again** Done! :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Crabtree,QC (Joliette) CM-3679 pre-amp
Posts: 66
|
If you understand French, here is a link to Radio-Canada's program La Facture:
La facture, Feb. 14, 2012 "Rabbit ears, are they really dead?" They went to Bell and Videotron with a hidden camera and both told the customer that OTA doesn't exist anymore. |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
Excellent sting operation!
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 732
|
With CBC terminating their analogue transmitters this summer, they will be dependent on BDUs to get their signals to viewers/taxpayers in many places. Why would they want to promote OTA when they will only be on BDU in many parts of Canada?
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunnville, Ontario on the Grand River, North shore Lake Erie
Posts: 2,406
|
I think CBC will likely get another extended approval to continue analog in those remote/fringe areas anyways. As far as I can tell, most CBC analog are broadcasting LP in the Lo-VHF spectrum, so they are not a threat to interfering with the higher frequency usage.
__________________
3D SSH III with ZZ4 refl. http://imageshack.us/user/jmsdigital |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: (SoHo area) London ON
Posts: 603
|
I do not see a reason why CBC + SRC cant just become a subchannel on a another channel. Was this not the reason for the DTV push? To have more or higher quality channels?
I know in many areas in our country would love to have NHiC rights. All CBC would have to do is give up some of advertising revenue. Plus this would cool flames that are about to burn CBC. Read ya l8r, Al
__________________
OTA: DB8 + Y5 2-6 + CM777. FTA: 30W + 72W + 87W + 97W |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,630
|
It has nothing to do with approval or extensions. It is all about money. With the recent cutbacks, the CBC can no longer afford to support its 600+ analog transmitters. They were planning on shutting them down soon as the infrastructure is reaching the end of its life, but the cutbacks are accelerating things.
__________________
Link to my TVFool results is in my profile Homepage URL. I suggest others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Craig Henry (Greenbank/Hunt Club), Nepean, ON
Posts: 2,733
|
Don't forget that the CBC is getting all the advertising revenue right now from people who watch on BDUs in areas where there is already no CBC OTA presence (Kamloops, Medicine Hat, etc.). Restoring private affiliates there, as well as London, Saskatoon, Saint John, and all the other large centres about to lose OTA would mean losing ALL that revenue to private affiliates, as opposed to only revenue accruing to the OTA-only people that they are losing now.
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
|
Of the 602 transmitters that are slated for shut down... many cover exceedingly sparse populations... not the case with area's such as London.... To save $10 million dollars, this just doesn't seems logical? You could probably shut down 500 transmitters keep the last 102 in the most populous areas, save a bundle and still cover 99% of the population..
What impact will these shut downs have on priorty carriage by the BDU's?? Can Rogers London drop CBC off of it's cable lineup since it's not being distributed? Is there any Sim-Subbing going on on CBC? Jeopardy? |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|