CBC's OTA Future: Discussion - Page 3 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Internet, Phone, TV and Wireless Service Providers > Over-The-Air (OTA) Digital Television

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2012-04-18, 02:30 PM   #31
Jakeman3
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Default

Great thanks. I'll look into and see how it works out for me. When it come to the sales rep - I'll be strong ;-)
Jakeman3 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2012-04-18, 06:58 PM   #32
Jakeman3
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Default

I'm surprised that there isn't more protest about this?? I mean, if the private broadcaster turned off, I'd be upset.. When public broadcaster turns off, I'm angry.. Fired off a letter to Tony Clement and the local Metroland group Cottagecountrynow.ca C'mon, 85,000 people in Parry Sound - Muskoka isn't worth it?? GLOBAL switched over their stick that covers most of the area...
Jakeman3 is offline  
Old 2012-04-18, 08:39 PM   #33
BCF
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 261
Default OTA-London, very interesting news regarding CBC broadcasting in London

Quote:
Originally Posted by OTA-London View Post
Just letting you know, not to count out the CBC going Dark in London yet. Big Details to be released soon, and not from the CBC.
Hum, interesting.... after all the complaints to the CBC, CRTC, municipal, provincial, and federal politicians and everything else that transpired last year!!

It would be good to see the CBC continue to broadcast in the London area (but switch to digital, of course). Even with the $115M funding cut, the CBC is still given about $1B annually..

I think I'd look forward more to seeing the CBC broadcasted on a x.1 OTA channel, and use a x.2 subchannel for CBCNN. Both broadcasting at 720p. Just wishful thinking...
BCF is offline  
Old 2012-04-19, 09:08 AM   #34
someguy23475
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wayne, MI (between Ann Arbor and Detroit)
Posts: 251
Default

Perhaps someone wants to start up a private CBC affiliate in London? I know the CBC has been weeding those out, but you never know.
someguy23475 is offline  
Old 2012-04-20, 05:07 PM   #35
TOTVBuff
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SW Riverdale, Toronto
Posts: 17
Default

They could use the sub-channel to broadcast CBC French. Its viewing audience isn't that great that it really requires its own channel.
TOTVBuff is offline  
Old 2012-04-20, 05:37 PM   #36
Jakeman3
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Question CBC's OTA Future, 2012: Discussion

Someone should suggest a story to CBC marketplace. Tom Harrington could inform the public that they have options available and also expose the lies that the cable companies are deliberately spreading...
Jakeman3 is offline  
Old 2012-04-20, 08:21 PM   #37
j0dest3r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakeman3 View Post
Someone should suggest a story to CBC marketplace. Tom Harrington could inform the public that they have options available and also expose the lies that the cable companies are deliberately spreading...
I tweeted him and asked for a story just for the heck of it since it was such a good idea.

**EDIT** here was his response:

Thanks for the idea E-mail more details. marketplace@cbc.ca

**EDIT Again**

Done! :-)
j0dest3r is offline  
Old 2012-04-22, 02:27 PM   #38
krusty79
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Crabtree,QC (Joliette) CM-3679 pre-amp
Posts: 66
Default

If you understand French, here is a link to Radio-Canada's program La Facture:

La facture, Feb. 14, 2012 "Rabbit ears, are they really dead?"

They went to Bell and Videotron with a hidden camera and both told the customer that OTA doesn't exist anymore.
krusty79 is offline  
Old 2012-04-22, 02:42 PM   #39
stampeder
OTA Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
Default

Excellent sting operation!
stampeder is offline  
Old 2012-04-23, 01:49 PM   #40
GeorgeMx
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 732
Default

With CBC terminating their analogue transmitters this summer, they will be dependent on BDUs to get their signals to viewers/taxpayers in many places. Why would they want to promote OTA when they will only be on BDU in many parts of Canada?
GeorgeMx is offline  
Old 2012-04-23, 02:06 PM   #41
ota_canuck
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunnville, Ontario on the Grand River, North shore Lake Erie
Posts: 2,406
Default

I think CBC will likely get another extended approval to continue analog in those remote/fringe areas anyways. As far as I can tell, most CBC analog are broadcasting LP in the Lo-VHF spectrum, so they are not a threat to interfering with the higher frequency usage.
__________________
3D SSH III with ZZ4 refl. http://imageshack.us/user/jmsdigital
ota_canuck is offline  
Old 2012-04-23, 03:10 PM   #42
Emerald_Boar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: (SoHo area) London ON
Posts: 603
Default

I do not see a reason why CBC + SRC cant just become a subchannel on a another channel. Was this not the reason for the DTV push? To have more or higher quality channels?

I know in many areas in our country would love to have NHiC rights. All CBC would have to do is give up some of advertising revenue.

Plus this would cool flames that are about to burn CBC.

Read ya l8r,
Al
__________________
OTA: DB8 + Y5 2-6 + CM777. FTA: 30W + 72W + 87W + 97W
Emerald_Boar is offline  
Old 2012-04-23, 04:30 PM   #43
roger1818
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,630
Default

It has nothing to do with approval or extensions. It is all about money. With the recent cutbacks, the CBC can no longer afford to support its 600+ analog transmitters. They were planning on shutting them down soon as the infrastructure is reaching the end of its life, but the cutbacks are accelerating things.
__________________
Link to my TVFool results is in my profile Homepage URL. I suggest others do the same.
roger1818 is online now  
Old 2012-04-23, 04:49 PM   #44
tvlurker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Craig Henry (Greenbank/Hunt Club), Nepean, ON
Posts: 2,733
Default

Don't forget that the CBC is getting all the advertising revenue right now from people who watch on BDUs in areas where there is already no CBC OTA presence (Kamloops, Medicine Hat, etc.). Restoring private affiliates there, as well as London, Saskatoon, Saint John, and all the other large centres about to lose OTA would mean losing ALL that revenue to private affiliates, as opposed to only revenue accruing to the OTA-only people that they are losing now.
tvlurker is offline  
Old 2012-04-23, 05:00 PM   #45
Jakeman3
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 98
Default

Of the 602 transmitters that are slated for shut down... many cover exceedingly sparse populations... not the case with area's such as London.... To save $10 million dollars, this just doesn't seems logical? You could probably shut down 500 transmitters keep the last 102 in the most populous areas, save a bundle and still cover 99% of the population..

What impact will these shut downs have on priorty carriage by the BDU's?? Can Rogers London drop CBC off of it's cable lineup since it's not being distributed? Is there any Sim-Subbing going on on CBC? Jeopardy?
Jakeman3 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.

OTA Forum Sponsor


Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.