gray hoverman for channels 28 to 45 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Internet, Phone, TV and Wireless Service Providers > Over-The-Air (OTA) Digital Television > Antenna Research & Development

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-01-01, 11:47 PM   #1
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default gray hoverman for channels 28 to 45

Where would I find the latest instructions for building a Gray Hoverman ( or any other high gain flat screen antenna)that would be best for channels 28 to 45? Thank you.
eldgreen is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-01-02, 12:05 AM   #2
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
Default

No vhf-hi needed ? Most GHs excel in that channel range.

JEDs single bay GH10 here : http://www.jedsoft.org/fun/antennas/dtv/gh.html

Or for a bit more gain in a double bay you could build the modified DBGH original in mesh, tips and plans here : http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=95898

If you have strong signals on channels 42 - 45, then maybe the GH10 rev0 curved mesh build would be for you, I also have step by step plans for it.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 12:16 AM   #3
Dalek Prime
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 262
Default

His signals are weak on those channels.
Dalek Prime is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 12:43 AM   #4
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default

Hello 300 ohm. Its good to talk with you again. How does the GH compare to the old style 4228? We discussed before about making a single channel high gain antenna for channel 45.But now the wife says she would like to get channel 28 also. At 130 miles it realistic to make a GH for my attempt to get these channels or should I just stick with making a yagi for channel 45? Thanks again for taking time with me again. I didn't realize you were the resident guru on GH antennas.
eldgreen is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 12:44 AM   #5
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
Default

Yeah, and he also needs channel 9.

eldgreen, dont switch threads on us, we get confused, heh.

Build nikiml GH10n3 here : http://clients.teksavvy.com/~nickm/g..._9V7_15u0.html
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 12:49 AM   #6
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
Default

Quote:
At 130 miles it realistic to make a GH for my attempt to get these channels or should I just stick with making a yagi for channel 45?
Either way, the odds are slim to none for consistant reception. After Line of Sight (LOS) which is basically around 70 (outside 80) miles, there has to be some kind of a rare geologic abnormality to get uhf signals well consistantly. Tropo reception isnt consistant. And IMO, a broad side type antenna, like a GH or bowtie , is better for tropo reception than a yagi or LPDA type. Lower VHF frequency signals will bend somewhat to the curvature of the Earth, and AM radio signals, which are very low frequency, really hug the Earth for great distances.

Quote:
How does the GH compare to the old style 4228?
Even the original DBGH gen1 beats the pants off it for the range your talking about, heh. Building the original DBGH with a mesh reflector frame is even simpler and gives even more gain. But for obvious reasons, NARODs cant be used with a mesh reflector frame.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 01:21 AM   #7
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default

Man ya'll are fast. I'm sorry for changing horses in the middle of a stream. I'm still learning.But don't hesitate to get on to me. I'm going to play with my new found hobby and if I have any problems now I know to just continue on with this thread. When I talked about making a single channel antenna, I was thinking about using it with a broadband antenna and using an
a-b switch at the tv.Again ya'll are great.
eldgreen is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 01:38 AM   #8
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
Default

Quote:
Man ya'll are fast. I'm sorry for changing horses in the middle of a stream.
In the words of Monty Pyhtons Flying Circus, you dont want to change threads, unless its "Now, its time for something completely different", heh.

“Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Know what I mean?”

Yeah, choosing an antenna from all the plans here can be confusing. Basically, most of the time you have to weigh gain vs beamwidth or even weird lobes. And IMO, theres plenty of room to come up designs that have very odd lobe patterns, but useful to a select few. Of course they should be separated in something like Area 51.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 04:33 PM   #9
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default

I've noticed that simply moving the balun around can have a noticable effect on the signal (on the 4228). Would I get a better more stable result by building one out of coax? If so please tell me where I can find simple clear instructions on how to build one.
eldgreen is offline  
Old 2011-01-02, 07:25 PM   #10
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,008
Default

Quote:
A coax balun is a cost effective method to eliminate feeder radiation, but is limited to a narrow set of operating frequencies.

* One easy way to make a balun is a (λ/2) length of coaxial cable. The inner core of the cable is linked at each end to one of the balanced connections for a feeder or dipole. One of these terminals should be connected to the inner core of the coaxial feeder. All three braids should be connected together. This then forms a 4:1 balun which works correctly at only a narrow band of frequencies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-05, 05:39 PM   #11
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default

Its me again. What difference does it make whether the director elements on a yagi are insulated or not? And would it work to space the elements an inch off of the boom?
eldgreen is offline  
Old 2011-01-06, 11:54 AM   #12
Dalek Prime
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eldgreen View Post
Its me again. What difference does it make whether the director elements on a yagi are insulated or not? And would it work to space the elements an inch off of the boom?
If they are not insulated, they cease to act as directors, and the entire structure becomes an untuned, unpredictable hunk of metal. And to space them off the boom? Why? You still have to line them up with the active element, and to hold them in place with an insulator. Really, just keep it simple.
Dalek Prime is offline  
Old 2011-01-06, 12:21 PM   #13
mclapp
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
Default

They still act as directors just have to do a correction for the element length because the mounting point makes the element look fat in that spot.

The yagi calculators on the web usually have a place to do that correction.
mclapp is offline  
Old 2011-01-06, 01:16 PM   #14
Dalek Prime
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 262
Default

Not if the active element isn't behind them being fed. But you're talking about horizontal spacing from the boom, and not vertical, which he didn't specify. I still don't see the value in it, though. And I certainly don't see the value in having them uninsulated. They are all active then, feeding the boom, if the boom itself is conductive.
Dalek Prime is offline  
Old 2011-01-06, 03:19 PM   #15
eldgreen
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 111
Default

Let me explain it more fully. A plastic electric fence insulator will hold a 1\4 inch element exactly (or at least the ones I have will). The distance then from the element to the mounting base will be approximately 1 inch. If I use a wire hose clamp or a zip tie to hold the insulator to the boom I would be able to adjust the location of the elements back and forth on the boom making experimenting easier. It should also be easy to mount the driven element in line with the directors it also being insulated.I intend to make the corner reflector in line with all the other elements and fix it so it can be slid back and forth on the boom for experimenting. I hope that I have clarified what I am thinking about. As you can clearly see the title of "Rookie" under my name is accurate.

Last edited by eldgreen; 2011-01-06 at 04:00 PM.
eldgreen is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.

OTA Forum Sponsor


Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.