TekSavvy Cable Internet Discussion - Page 5 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Digital Industry Forums > Internet, Landline and Wireless Phone

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-01-10, 02:05 PM   #61
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

Thanks for the quick reply.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-01-10, 10:06 PM   #62
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,189
Default

Greg, Are you running with the Linksys or the Asus router now? I was hoping to hear how the 15Mbps service worked on the WRT54GL.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 01:11 AM   #63
purpleyellow
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Default

Sorry if this has been already asked but I would like to know what the move fee of $65 for Teksavvy is. And if I would be charged that fee for switching from Rogers cable?

Thanks in advance.
purpleyellow is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 06:11 AM   #64
apn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 569
Default

I'm very disappointed that Teksavvy is saying nothing about UBB to its DSL customers, for whom it's already rubber-stamped by the CRTC. However, they're going to be more tight lipped, if that's possible, regarding cable because Rogers has only recently filed for a TPIA adjustment, effective July 1st.

Jake: There's no reason the veritable '54GL shouldn't work on a 15Mbps WAN, since all the W/L ports are 10/100 capable.

Personally, my decision to switch isn't hinged on UBB, since the worst case is that we'll get the underlying oligopoly service (be it 60GB or otherwise, plus overages) at a lower price. I'll also sleep better knowing that my money is going to support internet competition, and hope that one day TSI grows large enough and/or partners with others to build its own network.
apn is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 08:37 AM   #65
d_source
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 466
Default

I'll be doing the same eventually as well. I'm not going to panic and run right away though as i do have a plan i like with anotehr "competing" brand, a plan which has been grandfathered so I dont wanna lose it if i dont have to.
d_source is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 09:08 AM   #66
ScaryBob
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
Default

Quote:
I would like to know what the move fee of $65 for Teksavvy is.
That's if you want the service moved to a new address. I would guess that it's actually a fee charged by Rogers since it's not applied to DSL accounts.

Quote:
I'm very disappointed that Teksavvy is saying nothing about UBB to its DSL customers
Actually, they have said a lot, just not directly to its customers since the final outcome is not known yet. TSI has been, and still is, fighting UBB at CRTC hearings and has made statements on it's public forum.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary
ScaryBob is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 09:17 AM   #67
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

Final warning: This thread is about Teksavvy Cable. All posts discussing DSL will be deleted.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 10:49 AM   #68
grog
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Streetsville, ON
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apn View Post
Jake: There's no reason the veritable '54GL shouldn't work on a 15Mbps WAN, since all the W/L ports are 10/100 capable.
Just because the ports are 100 Mb capable doesn't mean the router can go that fast. LAN to WAN traffic runs through the router software so it's performance is very dependent on the router's CPU.

However, I've done some testing and although the Linksys is a bit of a bottleneck it seems to be a relatively minor one. The first thing to keep in mind though is the WAN speed is actually considerably higher than 15 Mbps due to the Rogers speed boost feature. It lets you burst at higher speeds for brief periods of time so for sporadic, bursty traffic like web browsing it is a noticeable improvement. With my new Asus router on SpeedTest I saw some of the local Canadian servers hitting speeds in the 35-40 Mbps range and more distant servers in the U.S. getting a still respectable 25-30 Mbps. Downloading large files of course levels off to ~15 Mbps after a little while.

Switching to the Linksys router running dd-wrt my speeds topped out at 30 Mbps so that seems to be its limit. Latency was about the same (13-14 ms for the local servers). This was LAN to WAN of course. Over wireless it topped out at around 15 Mbps so it's definitely limiting you there. However, if you don't mind the limited wireless performance then I don't think it's worth upgrading your router for the slightly better LAN to WAN performance. It didn't "feel" much different in either case - the Linksys seemed to be holding up just fine.
grog is offline  
Old 2011-01-11, 10:02 PM   #69
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,189
Default

Grog, That is encouraging news. Glad to see you tested the Wifi speeds too. Thanks.

Can't wait to try it out myself.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-01-12, 10:51 AM   #70
slyboy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 393
Default

Grog,
What firmware are you running on your Asus? Moving to the faster TSI Cable service I don't want to lose functionality in my router that is provided by the Tomato firmware (such as the "Static DHCP", access restriction, bandwidth monitoring, graphs, etc). There is a lot of good functionality provided through using the right firmware. Having said that, I appreciate your testing with the newer router and it is making me question whether I'd hold onto my WRT54GL or not. Of course, the best of both worlds would be to find a new modern router with faster processing that can also run the custom Tomato firmware or something comparable. Anyone know of any such router? I don't suppose you've looked into whether your Asus router can run different firmware?
__________________
Pioneer Elite PRO-730HD | Elite DV-59AVi | Marantz SR8200 | Mirage OM series | Rogers/Cisco 8642HD, SA4250HD
slyboy is offline  
Old 2011-01-12, 11:34 AM   #71
grog
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Streetsville, ON
Posts: 823
Default

I'm actually running TomatoUSB on the Asus router. So far, so good.
grog is offline  
Old 2011-01-14, 11:04 PM   #72
chroma10
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gaud Corners, ON
Posts: 34
Default

I'm in Bowmanville (fed from the Oshawa Rogers head end). I wonder how long it will take for TSI Cable to get out here. Their current prices and caps are very attractive. I cringe thinking what UBB might do to this situation but for the immediate time, it looks great.
chroma10 is offline  
Old 2011-01-17, 08:43 AM   #73
mcase
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Exclamation DOCSIS 3.0

As I am to understand it - the 6120 Moto Modem is a better unit to use.
3.0 Capable (faster packet throughput; faster internal clocking) and makes for a future upgradable product should the DOCSIS standard change.

Case in point - most ComCast cable users are using substandard DOCSIS 2.0 modems and have speeds "up to" 25MBPS.
Based on their equipment; they are only using the low end of the DOCSIS 2.0 spectrum.
With their upgrades to infrastructure, they are provisioning newer modems with a new boot file that is a 3.0 backed bin.

Maybe I am wrong but if Rogers ups the ante to 3.0; the infrastructure to your home is ready for a new upgrade to go to the faster fiber speeds when it gets to that point. Cable is FIBER to the node then copper clad to your house hence the better speeds and there is not much in use of the bandwidth on the line at that point.

Either way, I know the TSI company is a solid company and will be using their stuff in the near future. I prefer them.
/End ridiculous long rant.
mcase is offline  
Old 2011-01-18, 03:14 AM   #74
nbl957
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8
Default Internet only cable

I`ve moved from Rogers to Teksavvy for my Internet and am well satisfied.

I still have Rogers Basic Cable TV but I`d like to dump that in favor of a OTA HD system. I truly don`t watch too much TV anyway.

Here`s my question:- Does anyone know if I can cancel my Rogers TV yet keep my Teksavvy Cable Internet.
nbl957 is offline  
Old 2011-01-18, 07:47 AM   #75
hugh
Member #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
Default

nbl957, the answer is yes but I'd call TSI to ask if there are any special instructions so Rogers doesn't inadvertently shut down your Internet service also.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website.
hugh is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.