Which VHF-Hi ONLY antenna or other solution? - Page 4 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Internet, Phone, TV and Wireless Service Providers > Over-The-Air (OTA) Digital Television > Antenna Research & Development

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2010-09-23, 08:02 AM   #46
ProjectSHO89
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 383
Default

Quote:
Quote:
any thoughts on efficiently joining a vhf-low antenna to a vhf-hi/uhf combo antenna ?
An HLSJ from either Holland Electronics or Pico-Macom. Both are very efficient devices.
ProjectSHO89 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2010-09-24, 01:13 AM   #47
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,360
Default

Thanks, I do remember those.

I was thinking more in line with twin lead lead joining. I recall some formulas for twin lead lengths for the hi - low join.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2010-09-25, 03:08 PM   #48
holl_ands
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,135
Default

When dis-similar antennas are joined by simply twisting the twin-lead wires together, the
resultant impedance is anybody's guess. On any given channel, the fairly low SWR presented
by the "correct" antenna can be easily destroyed by an extremely low or reactive impedance
presented by the "other" antenna.

Since there are no frequency filters on either antenna, it is also possible for the "other"
antenna to destructively interfere with the "correct" antenna if the signal strengths are
fairly close....which may or may not be a problem, depending on both Gain curves.
The "other" antenna is also injecting more received noise into the system....

HLSJ Diplexer has low loss bandpass and band reject filters to prevent the above problem.
holl_ands is online now  
Old 2010-10-01, 01:41 PM   #49
bgavin
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orangevale, CA, USA
Posts: 12
Default

How well would your Loop Reflector work in combination with an Antenna Craft U8000?

I have the U8000 sitting at the top of a 10' mast segment.
The loop reflector would mount on the same mast, under the U8000.
bgavin is offline  
Old 2010-10-03, 09:03 PM   #50
holl_ands
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,135
Default

Shouldn't be a problem as long as you mount it about half-way up the mast to keep it
as far away as possible from the U8000 and the roof below. You'll have to figure a way
to mount it to the mast so that it is isolated (no metal-to-metal contact).....
holl_ands is online now  
Old 2010-10-03, 11:24 PM   #51
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,360
Default

Yeah, for vhf hi you would really want it away from the mast about 6 inches or so at least.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2010-10-06, 04:32 PM   #52
byebye_cable
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 487
Default

No disrespect intended, but I'm not sure I see a conclusion here as to what antenna design is best for VHF-HI. I'm guessing it's a yagi, but that's just a guess. Maybe a big reflector-less bowtie?
byebye_cable is online now  
Old 2010-10-06, 06:48 PM   #53
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,382
Default

my initial post was misleading, the fact is i needed the most directional, high gain, channel #13 antenna, preferably compact....

but yes i have to agree, looks like nothing will beat a single channel yagi given the above!
balm is offline  
Old 2010-10-06, 07:16 PM   #54
Jase88
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 4,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by byebye_cable View Post
No disrespect intended, but I'm not sure I see a conclusion here as to what antenna design is best for VHF-HI. I'm guessing it's a yagi, but that's just a guess.
I haven't seen many Yagi VHF antenna designs, except for single channel cut ones. Log periodic designs are more common (they are often mistaken to be "Yagi" antennas).

For maximum gain, I would recommend a large log periodic model.
__________________
DMX 68' tower, HyGain HAM 5 rotator, Antennas Direct 91-XG & C5, Channel Master 7777 preamp, Siemens surge protection
Jase88 is offline  
Old 2010-10-06, 10:02 PM   #55
holl_ands
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,135
Default

It is impossible to declare any particular Hi-VHF antenna "best" without knowing the "criteria":
1) Most Gain (or F/B) DIY irrespective of size (do you have room for a 20-element Yagi or Log-Yagi???),
2) Most Gain (or F/B) in a commercial antenna for a "typical" attic installation (100-inch boom Log-Yagi???)
3) Most Gain (or F/B) DIY for a given H, W and/or D (e.g. even smaller, such as K6STI's 5-Element Yagi):
http://www.imageevent.com/holl_ands/yagis
4) Easiest (and/or least expensive) DIY with High Gain (perhaps Zig-Zag Log Periodic or LPDA).
5) Easiest (and/or least expensive) DIY with Moderate Gain (2-Bay or Circular Loop, with or w/o a Reflector).
6) Least expensive commercial antenna with Moderate Gain (perhaps Antennacraft 60-in boom Y5-7-13)
7) Compact commercial antenna with Moderate Gain (perhaps A-D C5).

Very few Yagi designs provide good Gain, SWR and F/B Ratio across the ENTIRE Hi-VHF Band,
with the exception of K6STI's 5-Element Yagi (7.5-9.5 dBi Gain). Commercial Log-Yagi's, such as
W-G YA-1713 (100-in) and Antennacraft Y10-7-13 (120-in) provide about 10 dBi Gain and so-so
F/B Ratio....or about the same as a 100-inch long Zig-Zag Log Periodic Wedge or a DIY LPDA with
a 100-inch Boom length constraint.

A Hi-VHF antenna with more than 10 dBi of Gain will likely NOT cover the ENTIRE band and might
only cover a single channel, such as the following Ch7 12-Element Yagi, which is 4.7-meters long:
http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/yagis/12elyagi
holl_ands is online now  
Old 2010-10-07, 08:24 AM   #56
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,382
Default

Quote:
It is impossible to declare any particular Hi-VHF antenna "best" without knowing the "criteria":

agreed, but this thread allowed for a rather concise summary and useful breakdown of the various options, thank you
balm is offline  
Old 2010-10-07, 08:45 AM   #57
byebye_cable
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 487
Default

Holl ands, I'd just say max gain within reasonable constraints on size, outdoor, F/B not significant, both DIY and commercial.

A major component of my job is "dumbing down" complex technical issues for non-technical people so I can get their agreement on how to move forward. I suppose I view the conclusion of this thread in the same light.
byebye_cable is online now  
Old 2010-10-07, 09:15 AM   #58
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,360
Default

Quote:
I'd just say max gain within reasonable constraints on size, outdoor,
Max gain is not always what you want. Generally, the higher the antenna gain, the narrower the beamwidth. Beamwidth can be very important. Say you have two transmitting towers 35 degrees apart. A high gain antenna will probably only catch one well without a rotor. A lower gain antenna may do both well without a rotor.
TVFool data and the FCC coverage charts provide a wealth of info to determine what you need. The FCC coverage charts assume 4 db for vhf-low and 6 db for vhf-hi. Outside of the FCC coverage area, youre heading into DXing area.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2010-10-07, 10:52 AM   #59
byebye_cable
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 487
Default

Agreed, max gain on the assumption the antenna would be pointed right at the tower. Those VHF bowties on Holl_ands site look enticing, not to prejudice any conclusion I suppose those could easily be tuned to a specific frequency?
byebye_cable is online now  
Old 2010-10-07, 12:28 PM   #60
Dave Loudin
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: King George, VA
Posts: 358
Default

Again, that's not always the desired outcome. I can think of many areas in the DC/Baltimore metro that would need broader beamwidth to catch the VHFs from both markets. Your solution would work for me, since the two markets are nearly on the same azimuth from my location.

However, I have VHF DX opportunities 180 degress from Baltimore, so that implies yet a different solution. A table of options is probably the best outcome for this thread.
Dave Loudin is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.

OTA Forum Sponsor


Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.