![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 1,374
|
http://www.blogtechnical.com/interne...n-hackers.html
"While Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari were cracked within minutes on Day 1, Chrome was able to stand firm for all 3 day on various platforms" |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Member #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,492
|
Yeah Chrome! My favourite browser.
__________________
As of January 2012, I am no longer the owner of the Digital Home website. If you have questions about the operation of the site, please contact VSAdmin. For personal inquiries contact me at the Hugh Thompson website. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 235
|
In what ways were they cracked? Your link doesn't say much.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 1,374
|
Chrome is a fantastic browser. It's what I mostly use too. The incognito windows are great for people who look at allot of
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 908
|
I have epiphany, firefox and chome, I use Chrome 90% of the time.
__________________
4DTV DSR922 HDD 200 VC 2+ GI2500R VC 2 Pansat 2500a c/ku/dbs feed 10.6ft Clearview mesh AMC-8 to AMC-12 24"Venture. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 4,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 2,669
|
^^^
The two quoted links offer contrary commentaries, but I think it's not that they didn't target it; they were unable to hack it. This could lend a lot of credibility to Google's efforts for Chromium OS. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 235
|
So far, the only browser to remain standing is Google’s Chrome, because none
of the hacking contestants chose to target that browser. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 1,374
|
You don't learn your hacking skills from osmosis. I would tend to think that any real hacker who's goal is to break something unbroken would have spent some time with Chrome before the contest. If all the people involved were just using existing tools and cracks they aren't real hackers to begin with, just script kiddies. So I would say that all hackers choosing not to touch Chrome still validates Google's efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
I think the title of the thread should switch "un-hackable" for "not hacked"...
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 588
|
Give it some time (Chrome to get some, more, traction) and let them (Google) add more features and you'll see how fast Chrome is going to join "hackable" group.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 4,718
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
|
Excellent post! this is good to know.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|