![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#76 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunnville, Ontario on the Grand River, North shore Lake Erie
Posts: 2,406
|
Thanks to the assistance of a IC Spectrum Management Officer, I finally found the culprit of our local broadcast interference. A local taxi group has a radio license for frequency of 165.525 MHz. The base station is about 600ft away on another street in behind my lot, but their cars are always passing right by my house when they come&go on calls. They have 10 vehicles that use that 165.525 MHz frequency.
Any suggestions? _______________________ He also provided this useful self help link: http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst...h_sf06086.html Real Video Presentation: Cutting Through... Radio Interference Play high bandwidth version (450 KB/sec) http://mmprodnt.ic.gc.ca/mmpub/DGRB//interference.rm
__________________
3D SSH III with ZZ4 refl. http://imageshack.us/user/jmsdigital |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#77 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 4,113
|
^^^^^ Notch filter with about 50dB of attenuation.
__________________
DMX 68' tower, HyGain HAM 5 rotator, Antennas Direct 91-XG & C5, Channel Master 7777 preamp, Siemens surge protection |
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,680
|
ota_canuck, My suggestion is to get a 165.5 MHz notch filter (TinLee should be able to make one for you). It is far enough away from both VHF-HI (174 MHz) and FM (108MHz) that it doesn't need to be a sharp notch. If you ask nicely, the taxi company may even be willing to pay for it. When you get it, you can do some experimenting, but you may need to put it before your pre-amp.
You could also try an HLSJ to see if it will knock it out. If you need VHF-LO, you could join two of them together back to back (LO to LO/HI to HI) and see if that works. It likely won't be as good as a 165.5 MHz notch, but it will be much cheaper.
__________________
Link to my TVFool results is in my profile Homepage URL. I suggest others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 4,113
|
I may have mentioned this before, but this page at Industry Canada (see Appendix 4) details how to make a simple quarter-wave or half wave coax "stub" notch filter to attenuate interfering signals.
__________________
DMX 68' tower, HyGain HAM 5 rotator, Antennas Direct 91-XG & C5, Channel Master 7777 preamp, Siemens surge protection |
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,248
|
Im testing for poor TV signals in a location which is lower than immediate surrounding lots and houses, and also no AM channels come in
Most TV channels come in around 20% at 20 ft high, even the strong local ones Reception in surrounding area is otherwise very good All house wiring appears properly installed. What can be affecting the AM sand Tv signals so much ? |
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: St-Eustache, Qc
Posts: 180
|
Suppose that I care only about channel 10 and that I want to reduce interference:
Does using a VHF-Hi only antenna can help reducing interference on channel 10, instead of using a VHF+UHF antenna like a 4228? Or maybe a single channel antenna? |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 5,089
|
^^^^
165 MHz is a bit below Ch 7, so a VHF high antenna won't do much to help you. A dedicated Ch 10 antenna might. However, that link to solutions provides a possible fix. You need a "T" connector and a short piece of coax & F connector. You start with the cable a bit longer than necessary and start trimming until it works. If you trim too much, then just start with a new piece of cable, cut to where you had best results. A quarter wavelength open line will appear to be a short at the target frequency.
__________________
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is advised. |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,680
|
While Yagis have a sharp drop off above the desired channel, they degrade gradually below so a channel 10 antenna won't help that much. If you only care about channel 10, another option is to get a CM-0580 Channel 10 Join-Tenna (discontinued but still available from the Channel Master store) and use it as a band pass filter on a VHF-HI antenna.
__________________
Link to my TVFool results is in my profile Homepage URL. I suggest others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: St-Eustache, Qc
Posts: 180
|
I not sure to understand how channel filtering can help reduce interference. I mean, once the interference signal hits the antenna, isn't it too late to filter?
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 160
|
No, as long as the filtering is done prior to the input of the mast mounted pre-amp..
__________________
TV Fool YA-1713, 91-XG, UVSJ, HLSJ, CM 3414, Insignia LCD |
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa (Stittsville), ON, OTA (Radio Shack Omnidirectional Antenna and 5Y6S in Attic), MythTV HTPC
Posts: 5,680
|
^^^ Unless, of course, it is co-channel/multipath interference, in which case the only hope is a more directional antenna that will increase the strength of the desired signal (on axis) and decrease the strength of the undesired signal (off axis). Interference at other frequencies/channels can be filtered out.
__________________
Link to my TVFool results is in my profile Homepage URL. I suggest others do the same. |
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 5,089
|
Quote:
__________________
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is advised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dunnville, Ontario on the Grand River, North shore Lake Erie
Posts: 2,406
|
One of the other most common 2way radio type interferences is from trucker's CB radio use while they're sitting in the factory parking lot across the street. As you said, with the taxi radio on 165 MHz issues, the CB's are likely also causing overload in the receiver which can affect most, or all of the TV 7-51 signals. CB radio interferences can be extreme, if the user does not have their CB antenna trimmed out properly, then they will really make a mess of local TV reception.
__________________
3D SSH III with ZZ4 refl. http://imageshack.us/user/jmsdigital |
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 5,089
|
^^^^
If a CB is causing that sort of interference, it's running a lot more than the permitted power level. Those radios are allowed a maximum of 5 watts DC input power or 4 watts RF output. Also, the most likely channel to be interfered with is Ch 2 (2nd harmonic of 27 MHz).
__________________
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is advised. |
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Amherst, NY (Near Buffalo)
Posts: 54
|
I never heard it, because they got cable by the time I was old enough to care, but my grandmother said she used to be able to hear truckers talking through her TV when they would pass by. This was obviously in the analog days.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|