![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
I think that it would be nice to have links in the table for these antennas or their computer models. For example I have been unable to find the M-4. Thanks, --John |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 | |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
Quote:
I used the terms M-4 and M-8 because he had not given them names, so I just used mclapp 4 and mclapp 8. Today I'll put his spreadsheet up for you folks to check out. Hopefully mclapp will drop in today too. Last edited by stampeder; 2009-01-18 at 04:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
Here's a comparison chart of some of mclapp's designs:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
|
Quote:
The one Stampeder is calling M-4 is a 4 bay with a 14" reflector spacing, that one has the highest peak but a narrower band width, the 4 - 5" reflector spacings are more consistant across the UHF band but with 1 db or so less peak. I've got a 8 bay vertical stack that's up to 19dbi net but have yet to test it other than computer modeling. A version of it is in the computer models folder in the link above, look for 8 bay vert stack. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 45
|
Mclapp,any chance of putting your 8 bay vert stack" 19dbi " on the graph above
?? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 45
|
Does anyone know I would find the specs on this antenna?element length and feed line spacing and stuff like that? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
|
It's (2) 10" whisker 4 bays stacked vertically with the feed points 40" apart with a curved 40" wide wire fence reflector spaced 4" behind the driven elements. I have only computer modeled this antenna, I haven't finished building it so it hasn't been tested out in the field. Here is a picture of the semi built antenna. The phase lines between the 2 antennas have not been attached yet.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
|
If you have a way to read excel spread sheets I have one on my web space called "4 bay compare 11-23-08" It has the computer simulated gain info on that antenna and many others I've modeled.
http://www.frontiernet.net/~mclapp/Antennas/plots/ Sorry, I see stampeder already posted a link to that spreadsheet. If you can't do excel I could post a gain curve of that antenna. I'll give a quick run down here. The UHF gain peaks at about 19.1dbi net around channel 41, the gain at channel 14 is 16.5dbi net and at ch 50 it's 17.5dbi net. I've found from my field testing on the antennas I've built that the gain curve is shifted downward on UHF a few channels compared to the computer models . For VHF-HI the peak gain is 10.8dbi net on channel 8 and drops to 9.5dbi. net on channel 7 and 5.3 dbi net on channel 13. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 45
|
Looks good! I think this will be killer for NBC Buffalo ch33 "18.25 net gain". Can't wait for you to test it
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Forest, VA
Posts: 1
|
mclapp:
Built 3 of your m4's with excellent results. I have enough materials on hand to built your stacked 8 bay and am ready to try it out. Couple questions. 1. What is the spacing for the 10"whiskers ? 2. Is your phase line spacing still 1 1/4" ? 3. You state a 40" feed point but I don't see it on your picture. (do you have a schematic I could follow?) |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,545
|
If there exist some detailed measurements for construction, I might be able to insert this antenna into a test lab equipped with a Spectrum Analyzer and Tracking Generator.. the output of which would be a plot of *actual* frequency response across the UHF band..
Need the measurements in easy-to-digest form, though. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No I don't have a diagram of this yet I'm building mine off of the computer model dimensions. The co-phase line is a little different, I'm going to use a tapered spaced phase line where the wires start at 1 1/4" at the feed point of each antenna narrow to 3/4" then open up to 2" at the center between the two 4 bays. The tapered spaced line is an effort to get a better impedance match over a wider range of channels. I'll try to get a drawing made of the co-phase line the rest of the antenna is really just two 10" whisker 4 bays vertically spaced 40" center to center. It was modeled with swept forward elements (2") and a curved reflector 40" wide and 80" tall spaced 4" behind the elements. My as built uses two 40" wide x 38" tall reflectors and I left a 2" gap between the reflectors. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 45
|
Well I started building one of these but I already had my whiskers made up so it won't be exact. 9.5"whiskers with 9.25 spacing.I give update when done.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 597
|
That will be fine it will just have slightly less gain below ch20 and slightly more above 40.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| antenna |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|