They don't mention it in the story, but aren't they talking about CHWI 16.1?
September 3, 2011
http://www.windsorstar.com/business/rocky+start/5349103/story.html
========
Mumford was told Cogeco was unable to get a clear standard definition (SD) signal from Windsor, so it switched over to London.
The HD signal, which is carried on Cogeco Channel 803, was unaffected by the switch.
========
Why couldn't (or why doesn't) Cogeco's head-end equipment generate the SD signal from the HD signal?
How many other broadcasters have to supply cable-co's with dedicated SD (480i) feeds now (using some other method other than OTA) ?
September 3, 2011
http://www.windsorstar.com/business/rocky+start/5349103/story.html
========
Mumford was told Cogeco was unable to get a clear standard definition (SD) signal from Windsor, so it switched over to London.
The HD signal, which is carried on Cogeco Channel 803, was unaffected by the switch.
========
Why couldn't (or why doesn't) Cogeco's head-end equipment generate the SD signal from the HD signal?
How many other broadcasters have to supply cable-co's with dedicated SD (480i) feeds now (using some other method other than OTA) ?