![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
|
300ohm. Is it possible to stack your SBGH with a second unit? If not, do you have plans and a parts list to build your DBGH?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,039
|
Quote:
Hmm, I just noticed that the bottom of the screen is already at 127mm (5 inches) which is the distance between the sets of elements in the original DBGH drawing. Adding the second SBGH to the first will increase this distance. The effect of this hasnt been modeled yet. Since Im pretty well done playing and testing with this SBGH, I was planning to make it into a DBGH sometime this week. What Ill do, is to try to model the effect of an increase in distance between the two element sets on a DBGH made with my plans. If it turns out it hurts performance, Ill have to change the lower bottom section construction details. (which could actually make the costs lower, hmmm) In the meantime, if you want to build this SBGH, just make it like I did. I only glued the cross tees, as they have been modeled and optimized at 100mm plus or minus 15mm, so they wont change. The rest of the the tees and ells are held together with tiny wood screws, so future adjustments are easy and cheap. My whole idea of building this way was so the antenna could be updated, just like Windows service pack 1, 2, 3, heh.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. Last edited by 300ohm; 2008-07-28 at 08:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
|
300ohm. I'll look forward to your findings.
I have a friend that is also interested in this antenna and he and I will probably build a single for him and a double for me. We won't be doing this until at least September or more likely, October. I'd also like to wait until I see how the DBGH Generation 2 model turns out. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
|
300ohm. My friend is a broadcast engineer and he said your design is excellent and appears to be more sturdily built than a couple of other designs. We'll be building your single bay for him and possibly two of them for me to use unless the DBGH Generation 2 unit is unveiled by that time.
A question for you. I've read that you get more forward gain with the smaller mesh screen than large. Do you also lose some directionality if you use the larger mesh like you've used? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
OTA Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,039
|
Quote:
Quote:
I havent modeled it yet on this SBGH, but on a 4 bay whiskers type bowtie antenna, mclapp has and my guess is the SBGH will be in the same ballpark. His figures 2in X 4in mesh versus 1 X 2 mesh are : At channel 52, .73db less forward gain. At channel 40, .44db less forward gain. At channel 14, .17db less forward gain. And it scales fairly evenly between ch 14 and 52, so you can extrapolate. Since my highest channel I want after February is 42, .5db or so less gain maximum is a good trade-off for me, Im not greedy heh. So again its a compromise. If channels above 40 are important to you, then I would go with 1in by 2in mesh size or even smaller and then secure the antenna against high winds a lot more drastically.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. Last edited by 300ohm; 2008-07-29 at 08:05 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
|
Spoke to my friend and he also wants the DBGH apparently to watch LPTV in his area.
That being said is it possible to stack the WSYR TV engineer's antenna? I took a look at it and it appears that it will easily weather the storms of Lake Ontario but I can't quite see how it can be stacked with another. Do you think your unit can withstand the weather off Lake Ontario in the winter 300ohm? Not too many channels over 40 in most of the locations I am considering. That should not be a worry. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,039
|
Quote:
WSYRTV uses 1/2 inch mesh in his plans, so I would think more snow and ice would stick to it outdoors. Quote:
Even using common 14 gauge 2X4 inch fencing wire and 10 gauge copper element wire, it would be sturdier than almost all commercial units when u-bolted to a good mast IMO.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,039
|
![]() To turn the SBGH per my plans in my sig into a DBGH, simply build another SBGH per the plans and add new 3 pieces, which Ill call pieces J, cut to 4 3/4 inches long and pushed into the 1/2 inch fittings 5/8 of an inch. (shown on top in the photograph above of my uncompleted bottom portion of the DBGH) Remember to drill weep holes in the bottom of the antenna to let any water out, or during a freeze you may get a nasty surprise. This will result in a SBGH feedline to SBGH feedline of 45 inches (1143 mm) which is 2X the wavelength of about channel 23, which I feel is a good compromise for me based on my rough modeling of my 12 pair colinear rod DBGH. (To tweak for other channels, find 2X the wavelength of the frequency for that channel and adjust the sch 40 pvc and phasing line lengths accordingly. ) Also since my SBGH plans have the increased feed gap spacing of 93mm center of wire to center of wire, the phasing line spacing should be increased to 50-55mm too, also based on my rough modeling of my 12 pair colinear rod DBGH. I also found that the height of the phasing line above the elements is optimal around 10-30mm. (10mm is only slightly better than 30mm). And instead of the sharp bends, angling towards the gap size is just as well in all practical terms. What is very IMPORTANT, is that the phasing lines be exactly equal in length. So, using the above 45 inch (1143mm) distance between SBGH feedpoints and a phasing line gap of 50mm and 30mm height above the elements and using 10 gauge copper wire and compensating for the 360 degree middle loop and the 2 270 degree loops on the ends of the phasing line, (shown above in post #618) gives us 1143mm + 30mm + 30mm plus 7mm angular compensation plus (25.4mm + 16.51mm + 16.51mm total loops compensation) equals 1268.42mm (or divided by 25.4 = 49.94 inches, 50 inches rounded) total each phasing line to be cut. So in summary, you will need to cut 3 pieces of 1/2 inch schedule 40 pvc at 4 3/4 inches each to join the two sections and you will need to cut two 10 gauge wires to exactly 50 inches each for the phasing lines. I have not modeled the effects of joining or not joining the two sections of the mesh on the DBGH. Since that basically requires about 12 hours of straight computing time per run, I dont think Ill do that. Instead Ill try to determine the effects by old fashioned experimentation, heh.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|