![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#391 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 590
|
The only problem with trying to use a US provider is you loose access to the Canadian sports stations. If you're a big hockey fan (especially of your local team) it would probably be a dealbreaker?
That being said I'm a Wings fan. I wonder if I could get Fox Sportsnet Detroit if I signed up for Dish |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#392 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,996
|
This discussion is getting off topic. Next posts regarding DISH will be deleted without warning.
__________________
When it comes to humility, I am the greatest! |
|
|
|
|
#393 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 12
|
Animal Planet in HD on channel 251 just appeared for me today here in Edmonton. Still not showing channels 252 and 253 in the guide but I suspect that these channels will likely be reserved for Movie Central 2 and 3 when they become available here. But I think maybe they should move some channels around and re-arrange more logically if they are going to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
#394 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 251
|
Just a quick word of thanks to Shaw Champ for jumping in to clarify the issue around Nat Geo Wild. The family is enjoying it. Now if we could just get that all HD only package...!
|
|
|
|
|
#395 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton; Shaw
Posts: 210
|
I'm in Edmonton on the old HDPLus for $16.00 (I think is was $12.00 during 2011). I have one mpeg4 HD PVR box in my home plus 1 non MPEG4 HD PVR and 2 non mpeg4 HD boxes) - pretty heavily invested in HD.
I get all of the HD Channels except for Oasis (230) or APHD (251). The screen says "Not Authorized". I also do not subscribe to SCHD 1 & 2 or SNWLH (254) I am presently getting the NGWHD (255) on the mpeg4 HD PVR, perhaps on a free preview as others have stated. I don't think I will switch to the $35.00 package (from the present $16.00) any time soon - and especially if I can only watch the new channels on 1 TV in the house. |
|
|
|
|
#396 |
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AB. LG47"LE5500/Toshiba 32E200U /BDC6500/ Shaw Gateway
Posts: 824
|
@Mice72 and those in Edmonton. Nat Geo Wild HD & Animal Planet HD saw a change in that previously these were Digital Network Upgrade area only channels and have now been made available regardless of DNU area in the city due to some back end changes. Movie Central 2 & 3 HD (ch.252+253) in Edmonton will be in only areas that have had the upgrade only.
__________________
Shaw Employee, Opinions are my own unless otherwise stated. |
|
|
|
|
#397 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 12
|
Thanks for the info Shaw Champ. Is the entire city of Edmonton going to experience the DNU? If so, what kind of time frame are we looking at?
|
|
|
|
|
#398 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie
Posts: 97
|
Once again Shaw is not listening to their customers by adding channels people dont want or have serious demand for. All they are doing is wasting bandwidth. Hollywood Suite, FX and Global Reality Channel are what most are asking for and Shaw is pretending like they are not hearing. Shaw thought they lost a lot of money last quarter...just wait
|
|
|
|
|
#399 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,713
|
So you must have polled all Shaw users to find out what they want most in channels.
How do you know they are not listening? Is it because they didn't add the channels you, and around 50 other DHC members wanted? Sure on this forum those channels, you mentioned, are what people want most. However, the amount of people on this forum, that express interest in those channels, make up a very small fraction of Shaw's subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
#400 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#401 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie
Posts: 97
|
I dont have to poll anyone. The most popular channels in Canada for a long time have been Sports, Movies and Networks. Reality shows are also some of the highest rated shows among all Canadian shows. Nature shows aside from Discovery barely stay afloat. It's common sense really
|
|
|
|
|
#402 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 590
|
Except for reality shows (like Survivor) how big is the demand for repeats? I like to watch survivor a fair bit, but I wouldn't both to rewatch a season.
I would think a channel full of reality show repeats wouldn't be nearly as popular as first run material. Knowing who wins would kind of take the wind out of its sails. I've had enough of movie channels. Especially ones that come laced with commercials. If I want to pay for movies, I'll but a netflix subscription, or buy the odd movie off VoD. I'm pretty content with sports. It would be nice for Shaw to make some kind of CBC alternate channel to carry the extra HNIC feeds. (or maybe it would be nice for CBC to create something like that for shaw to air). With 7 Canadian teams, and 7 different regions, I don't think any provider could carry all the station in HD to guarantee no missed games. An alternate feed (like the sn1 feed) to carry the overlapping games would be brilliant. Networks we already have. I don't want more movie channels. I don't want a channel full of reality tv reruns. More sports.. can't argue with you there |
|
|
|
|
#403 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,713
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#404 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 33
|
I am a Shaw customer that has no interest in getting a watered down Canadian version of FX or another group of movie channels playing the same old movies over and over again.
Perhaps I am in the minority. |
|
|
|
|
#405 | |
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AB. LG47"LE5500/Toshiba 32E200U /BDC6500/ Shaw Gateway
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
__________________
Shaw Employee, Opinions are my own unless otherwise stated. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|