![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#16 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guelph, Ont
Posts: 175
|
not sure where to post this ...... seem like this is a logical location.
I am a Rogers customer with access to TMN and Rogers on Demand but..... With the closure of Blockbuster and Rogers on Demand does not have my titles availible; where does one go to view say: Thor and Captain America? I dont care to buy them. It seems there is a large hole to fill for Canadian streaming. EC |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#17 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
|
My experience with existing Canadian on-demand services is that prices are too high and and selection is pitiful. If a little 1998 startup like Netflix US can offer 12,000 titles for $8 per month, Rogers could do better. It's not as if Rogers doesn't have the technology and infrastructure. They just don't want to do it because their existing business model generates such huge profits.
Quote:
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Capital of the Great White North
Posts: 252
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Whitby, Ontario (Rogers Cable), LG 42PC3D, 8642HD
Posts: 514
|
Apple TV is an option for Thor and Captain America as well as many other movies that are not on Netflix - and usually $2 cheaper than ROD.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,308
|
Rogers should offer it's own Netflix like service with decent titles, and unlimited streaming that doesn't count against your bandwidth cap. If the content was good, that would lure Netflix customers over to Rogers. I can't believe they are not doing this. Yes I know about ROD online but that service doesn't cut it.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON; Shaw Direct HDPVR630/DSR505; Samsung HLT5687; Harmon/Kardon AVR247; Harmon/Kardon HKTS11
Posts: 440
|
I totally disagree with this. Having the ISP give preferential treatment to their own services would be a totally unfair competitive practice. ISP should only provide their service and be totally neutral/indiscriminate on what travels through their network.
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Whitby, Ontario (Rogers Cable), LG 42PC3D, 8642HD
Posts: 514
|
I agree rgto, going with that type of preferential treatment sets a bad precedent. Imagine if Bell bought Netflix or partnered and did not charge for usage, that would give Bell an unfair advantage.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|