![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | |
|
|
||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 258
|
Sounds just stupid enough to be true. I'd take it with a grain of salt, however, since the story originated in the New York Post.
http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/30/rum...-subscription/ |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
|
I see all video services eventually being tied to revenue streams in one way or another. It's been slowly happening but they will all become premium services or will be tied to other cash flow sources, such as BDU subscriptions. Even premium services may charge extra to view programming without advertising. I expect the big crunch will occur when main stream DVD rental services totally disappear. It now costs $10-$20 to rent a year old TV season or $50-$60 to purchase. Will the same prices for streaming the same material be far behind? I think not. First run viewing may cost even more.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 258
|
It's strange because Hulu Plus is a premium service and they show commercials. I'm interested to see where all this goes over the next few years. There is so much fragmentation, and so many regional restrictions and timing restrictions, etc., that it is really just too much to keep on top of.
I want to have a bunch of places on the web (or on my device) where I can go and choose from the same selection of media -- all the stuff I want in a number of different places (ie. competition). I've already given up on that dream, however. Well, the "legal" version of that dream, anyways. Hopefully if this Hulu business actually does happen Criterion will find a new streaming partner. They are by far the primary reason that Hulu is interesting to me. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 4,705
|
TechCrunch updated the article based on their own source close to Hulu:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
|
That's a scary site. 100% cheap reality shows.
Internet TV will probably grow to reflect the rest of the TV and movie industry. There will be tiers at fist run, second run and syndicated levels. There will be premium, pay and free services. There will be ad supported and purely subscriber supported services. Programming will be available for purchase, short term viewing or single viewing purposes. All that is changing is the delivery method. Like any emerging technology, there will be bargains and free trials at first to introduce the technology or gain customers and then fees will increase to raise more revenue.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 113
|
I went online to FOX the other day and in order to watch the two latest episodes I had to input my subscription info.
If you have an account with a participating TV provider you can be among the first to watch the most recently aired episodes on FOX.com. Otherwise, full episodes are available for viewing 8 days after the airdate. This is true wherever full episodes of FOX shows appear online. More TV providers are coming soon I went to Hulu and they were only available for Hulu Plus subscribers. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
|
I wonder when PBS will require a membership and donation to watch online?
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|