Which VHF-Hi ONLY antenna or other solution? - Page 24 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Internet, Phone, TV and Wireless Service Providers > Over-The-Air (OTA) Digital Television > Antenna Research & Development

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2012-04-09, 09:21 PM   #346
manuetdeo
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 30
Default

as i was reading this thread, i saw that you could use the stucco mesh as a conductor? is this true because i would be interested in build this huge bowtie and attach it to the side of my two story to see if it worked maybe hang it off the eave or something like that i just cant see making all those reflectors though.
manuetdeo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2012-04-09, 10:45 PM   #347
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,360
Default

You mean you want to use the existing mesh that's in your stucco ?
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2012-04-10, 05:06 PM   #348
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default Boom correction

Im working on new #13 yagi model, using 5/8" tubing for the elements. I read that no boom correction factor applies if the elements are more than half the boom thickness above the boom...so I was considering if it matters what the element thickness is ?
balm is offline  
Old 2012-04-10, 06:04 PM   #349
manuetdeo
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 300ohm View Post
You mean you want to use the existing mesh that's in your stucco ?
in post 333 holl_ands said something about using to mesh inside stucco as conductors and i didnt understand it. i would readily hang about any design from my eaves if the wall would reflect as a testing place as since my sweet spot is about 11 feet off the ground not 20-30 ft above my house attached to my fireplace, i get much better results lower
manuetdeo is offline  
Old 2012-04-10, 08:19 PM   #350
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,360
Default

Quote:
i would readily hang about any design from my eaves if the wall would reflect as a testing place
Yeah, that should be good if the wall is facing the station. Lots of people with aluminum siding facing the station report great reception using the siding as a giant reflector.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2012-04-11, 12:47 PM   #351
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default bow-tie

I too am thinking of pursuing my Ch #13 challenge with a huge bow-tie using the house as a backstop, but I also want to enclose the sides, and it might be doable with the bowtie, but unsure about how to go about it, material, size, configuration...

My signals are only receiveable at 8-13 ft above ground, so this might be best option...I would partially use the wall, and add on a shield for the upper part on the tower...maybe use some fine mesh for the sides with framing....

I think it might be more practical to do this, instead of building a cage around the yagi hanging off the tower, or maybe even better than stacking 2 yagis horizontal at at least 5-10 ft apart......

balm is offline  
Old 2012-05-03, 08:05 AM   #352
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default optimizing

Quote:
To MINIMIZES Hi-VHF SWR (max 1.7) at expense of Hi-VHF Gain (5.7-8.1 dBi) and even worse Lo-VHF SWR, use following:
BowLength=27in, BowSeparation=26in, TineSeparation=13.5in,
FeedlineSeparation=3.0-in and ALL AWG10 wire size.
http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/multibay/hivhf2bay

Was considering if there is any room for more optimization on this model, assuming ONLY a single design channel #13 (210-216 Mhz).

Of course I would still need some sort of reflector. Ultimately I would like to place this model in some sort of enclosure like a Faraday Cage, but with one end open...
balm is offline  
Old 2012-05-03, 01:04 PM   #353
Billiam
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 104
Default Comparing Three VHF Hi Antennas

Which of these three antennas has the best gain figures for VHF Hi channels?

Channel Master Quantum 1110
Blonder Tongue BTY LP HB
Antennacraft CS 1100

I am aware that the front to back ratio on the 1110 is rated at an unheard of 35 db which obviously makes it the most capable to reject signals off the side and back. But for the moment I simply need to know which of these antennas is going to offer the best pure gain for VHF Hi channels.

At the moment I am not concerned with VHF Lo though it is possible at some point, that I may be able to DX on that part of the band.
Billiam is offline  
Old 2012-05-03, 05:33 PM   #354
holl_ands
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,234
Default

The NO-Reflector Hi-VHF 2-Bay is ALREADY optimized for Ch13.

On the other hand, there is some room for improvement in the fol. 2-Bay
WITH Reflector version (e.g. swept forward bowties with bigger, curved reflector):
http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/multibay/hivhf2bayrefl

You should model Faraday Cage designs before you built it.....you could
very easily end up with a very poor design...
holl_ands is online now  
Old 2012-05-03, 05:59 PM   #355
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default

OK. Thanks

I'm not sure whats most practical, to build a shield enclosure for a short yag (5 elements), or the VHF Bow-Tie

I didnt find much practical documentation for RF shielding of TV antennas, with one side open. So I have a few questions,

1. Is there specific amount of space bewteen the antenna elements and the walls of the shield, if so what, and what overall size should the shield be (I intend on keeping one end open facing the trasmitter) ?

2. If not using a 100% closed material, would fine mesh be good enough, if so what is the maximum size of the mesh openings ?

3. Is the antenna reflector (bow-tie or yagi) still required or can I use the back of the cage as the reflector ?


(EDIT: oops I think we were posting at the same time ! sorry bout that)
balm is offline  
Old 2012-05-07, 06:58 PM   #356
rabbit73
DHC Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 210
Default

balm:
Quote:
1. Is there specific amount of space bewteen the antenna elements and the walls of the shield, if so what, and what overall size should the shield be (I intend on keeping one end open facing the trasmitter) ?
The spacing between the antenna and the enclosure needs to be greater for a yagi than for a bowtie antenna because the yagi is a higher Q antenna. If it gets too close to the sides it will de-tune the yagi sooner than the bowtie. Let the anti-ghosting trash can antenna by Bill Naivar be your guide.
Quote:
2. If not using a 100% closed material, would fine mesh be good enough, if so what is the maximum size of the mesh openings ?
Fine mesh might be good enough, certainly better that 1 inch mesh commonly used as a reflector, but not as good as solid aluminum sheet. You would need to make a test for F to B. The 1 inch mesh used for reflectors is based on keeping the opening less than 0.1 wavelength for minimum reduction of gain. I haven't seen any figures about mesh size to maximize F to B.
Quote:
3. Is the antenna reflector (bow-tie or yagi) still required or can I use the back of the cage as the reflector ?
You can use the back of the cage for the bowtie IF is gives the necessary F to B. The yagi should have its own reflector.

lithOTA is trying for max F to B for his co-channel problem:

Make a co-channel from the rear weaker
http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=153344

Have you seen his thread?

I told him that his problem reminded me of your co-channel problem and made a post about your St-Anicet problem. Rather than repeat my thoughts here you can go to:
www.digitalhome.ca/forum/showpost.php?p=1412198&postcount=35
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
rabbit73 is offline  
Old 2012-05-07, 08:59 PM   #357
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default

hello rabbit73,

Excellent summary.

Quote:
Even if you mount your antenna in a well shielded enclosure for the sides and back, you still must be careful not to pick-up any reflections in front of the antenna that come from the undesired co-channel signal.
Indeed, the only measure I could think of so far, would be to cover the metal boathouse in non-conductive materials, but likely still will not be sufficient attenuation

Another idea was to put the antenna, in front of the boathouse (such that it faces over the water, and such that the boathouse is not between the antenna and transmitter. And if I leave the antenna where it is, that is such that the boathouse is between it and the transmitter, then try aiming even slightly away to one side of the boathouse, I will lose what little signal there is.

I beleive holl_ands also mentioned that the ground in front of the antenna needs to be modeled if the antenna is enclosed, and close enough o the ground. For size reasons, I was thinking the bottom to have half the antenna with the house wall behind it (then, only the other half would be exposed to the wind "sail" effect on the tower. Thus, the bottom of the antenna would start around 5ft from the ground....

still at the stage of just thinking out loud....
balm is offline  
Old 2012-05-08, 07:21 PM   #358
rabbit73
DHC Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Excellent summary.
Thanks

Putting your antenna inside the boathouse for a test might have seemed like an exercise in futility, especially when the weather was bad, but it told me that the WVNY signal was weaker than the tvfool report would lead me to believe.
Quote:
Another idea was to put the antenna, in front of the boathouse (such that it faces over the water, and such that the boathouse is not between the antenna and transmitter.
If you put the antenna in front of the boathouse you will not receive the benefit of the signal boost from the additional signal reflected from the boathouse which adds to the direct signal.
Quote:
And if I leave the antenna where it is, that is such that the boathouse is between it and the transmitter, then try aiming even slightly away to one side of the boathouse, I will lose what little signal there is.
Yes, you will lose the benefit of the reflection from the boathouse that adds to the direct signal which isn't strong enough without help. But, when you aim the antenna at the boathouse you also pickup reflections of undesired signals coming from the rear.

If you can mount the antenna at the optimum height and at a location that it doesn't "see" the boathouse but has a ground mounted reflector screen that gives some signal enhancement that replaces the signal enhancement that you were getting from the boathouse, you MIGHT improve the reception of WVNY.

Your reception problem is so difficult that you need to use every trick you can think of all at the same time:

1. The most sensitive tuner you can find
2. The highest gain CH13 antenna you can construct
3. Use a preamp with a low NF for the CH13 antenna
4. Grounding the coax to exclude unwanted signals
5. Shield the antenna for Max F to B and to reject local unwanted signals
6. Mount antenna at optimum height
7. Provide signal enhancement that adds to the direct signal
8. Make sure that no objects are in front of the antenna that will pick up reflections from the signals coming from the rear
Quote:
....still at the stage of just thinking out loud....
Me too
rabbit73 is offline  
Old 2012-05-08, 07:50 PM   #359
balm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,408
Default

Quote:
If you can mount the antenna at the optimum height and at a location that it doesn't "see" the the boathouse but has a ground mounted reflector screen that gives some signal enhancement that replaces the signal enhancement that you were getting from the boathouse, you MIGHT improve the reception of WVNY.
yes, but this isnt clear to me yet, since its very tricky on a 50 ft property & water on 3 sides

To not see the boathouse, would lead me back to the idea of stacking horizontally a pair of high gain channel cuts to reduce the beam width more (does this make any sense) or enclosing a bow-tie

But, for a ground reflector, that mimics the boathouse, I dont think there is any other place better to situate it. The only other place would be actually right in front of the antenna, and behind the cottage wall such that co-channel #13 is somewhat less received by this ground reflector....not sure at all, since the co-channel seems to get around most of the property & cottage.

In fact, the boathouse as is, is already lower than the house, and close to the antenna, so it should already be somewhat protected from co-channel #13.

For the antenna itself, I think this is a good starting point:

Quote:
The metal would not only be needed for the reflector, but must extend around the sides to shroud the antenna from signals coming from the sides. You would still need to make sure that there were no objects in front of the antenna that would reflect the signals from the north into the front of the antenna. One example would be a 4-bay VHF antenna with a solid reflector and sides at least 1/4 wavelength deep. Yes, it would be big.
balm is offline  
Old 2012-05-09, 11:14 AM   #360
threeflags
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newmarket - North of Toronto
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 300ohm View Post
On your DB8 clone, just stick about four 32 inch reflector rods on it, or attach a piece of 32 inch wide mesh to it for channel 9.
In relationship to the bowties, where on the reflector should one strap these rods? All on one bay or spread out?

BTW, how did you come up with the rod length?

Thanks.
threeflags is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM.

OTA Forum Sponsor


Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.