CRTC's "HDTV Must Not be Degraded" policy. - Page 2 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Digital Industry Forums > Television Industry / Channels and Providers

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-09-29, 05:42 PM   #16
Raptor256
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 98
Default

I agree with everything you said GeorgeMX. It would take a lot of cash. Cash I'm sure the shareholders of Shaw see no reason to spend at the moment. Its really just the request of an interested customer that wants access to a great service at an attractive price.

I guess we can't forget about the "competition" issue when it comes to adding new channels as well. We seems to have set up this vertical market in Canada without the proper regulation to keep these companies that both create and distribute content from playing games with each other with regards to access to new channels.
Raptor256 is offline   Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-09-29, 06:26 PM   #17
GeorgeMx
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 738
Default

Quality and quantity are trade-offs just like regulation versus free market competition. I think that the satellite capacity constraints may be causing CTV and possibly Shaw to keep some channels in SD only even when the technical capability exists to provide HD. Offering HD versions to the competition (Rogers and the other cable companies) when the BDU that owns you can't deliver it doesn't make sense in a competitive environment. CTV uses HD programming from BNN but the service isn't offered in HD yet. The Queen street facility has been upgraded, at least in part, so more services could probably be in HD. I don't know what the situation is with Shaw but the same competitive logic applies.

I think that the BDU industry needs to look carefully at the HD format used for various services. BNN and The Weather Network would do just fine in 720p30 and use less bandwidth. The news channels could be distributed in 720p30 as well. Pure movie channels could be 1080p24 or 720p24. Why bother with higher frame rates when film is 24p? I think that 4 or 5 services at 720p30 or 720p24 could fit into 256 QAM or 8 PSK.

Just my 2 cents...
GeorgeMx is offline   Quick reply to this message
Reply

Tags
8psk, compression, hdtv

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.