CRTC requires Bell TV and Shaw Direct to carry more local television - Page 5 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Digital Industry Forums > Television Industry / Channels and Providers

Digital Home Helpful Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-05-07, 06:21 PM   #61
j0dest3r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,976
Default

Generally out of market channels are included in time shift packages so I would assume this wouldn't be any different.
j0dest3r is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-05-07, 07:38 PM   #62
cyclist44
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 733
Default

I think they should give all the local channel to everybody. That way bell wouldn't be playing favourites to certain areas. Where I live we only have 2 local channels and we get both of those but the next closest channel to our area is 300 miles away and we don't get that channel.
cyclist44 is offline  
Old 2011-05-07, 11:48 PM   #63
ScaryBob
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
Default

Bell tends to throw every OTA station into its basic package. Shaw Direct, OTOH, does not always do so. Some smaller stations are only available in their broadcast coverage area. Shaw Direct also has less expensive "value" packages that have only a limited number of OTA stations, similar to cable.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary
ScaryBob is offline  
Old 2011-08-26, 07:06 PM   #64
frontpl8
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Strathmore, Ab
Posts: 214
Default

In areas that have Digital OTA, I would rather get my locals that way any way. Don't need it taking up space on satellites.Keep that for the specialty channels that people want, and i'm sure people don't want to pay extra for channels that they should be able to get for free.
frontpl8 is offline  
Old 2011-08-27, 10:18 AM   #65
writerpatrick
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Default

Cable companies have tended to favor local channels anyways. It's mostly the satellite systems that are affected. We have a local OTA channel which is mainly a secondary channel of the CBC affiliate CHEX and I wonder if that one will get included. Most of the programming is the same as CBC but it does have local news.
writerpatrick is offline  
Old 2011-08-28, 09:31 AM   #66
classicsat
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kincardine ON.
Posts: 4,276
Default

The CHEX main Peterborough station has been on satellite from nearly the start (of DTH satellite in Canada). If the Oshawa re-transmitter carries their own local news separate from Peterborough, then it should also be on satellite, and probably even have their own broadcast license.
classicsat is online now  
Old 2011-08-28, 09:47 AM   #67
ScaryBob
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
Default

Quote:
Cable companies have tended to favor local channels anyways.
Cable companies must carry local channels. They have no choice. Only distant channels, outside the station's grade B contour, are optional.

Satellite companies have traditionally had more leeway because they are a national service. Now that Shaw owns Global and Bell owns CTV, not carrying independent local stations could be seen as anti-competitive.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary
ScaryBob is offline  
Old 2011-08-30, 09:30 AM   #68
doomy
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oshawa, just off the 401, under a cellphone tower, in the shadow of the GM plant
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by classicsat View Post
If the Oshawa re-transmitter carries their own local news separate from Peterborough, then it should also be on satellite, and probably even have their own broadcast license.
The Oshawa re-transmitter very much has differences from its Peterborough counterpart and the argument could easily be made that each should have its own separate license and therefore that both should be carried on satellite. Here is a sample 24hr period.

5:30-7:00 Peterborough:Quick Study and Local News
Oshawa: off air until 6:00, then Quick Study and Local News

8:00-9:00 Peterborough: Paid Ad and Religious programming
Oshawa: ethnic programming

12:00-13:00 Peterborough: CBC News Now
Oshawa: Local News and Colour Confidential

17:30-18:00 each has its own local news

11:30-sign off Peterborough: Late Show with David Letterman, paid ads
Oshawa: Local News, George Strombolopolous, different paid ads

Each also has its own commercials during breaks.
doomy is offline  
Old 2012-08-21, 07:42 PM   #69
hayabusa
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
Default

Any idea if this is still happening....im waiting for CTV in kitchener to go on Bell TV
hayabusa is offline  
Old 2012-08-22, 07:56 PM   #70
mr.eous
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 210
Default

Ahh, I forgot about this thread when I made my recent post in the Bell TV new channels discussion.

I think a more important question is whether government (regulatory compliance - CRTC) is actually keeping track of these things. With all the complex decisions they hand down every week, how can they possibly ensure companies like Bell actually comply with their new regulations by the deadlines imposed?
I suppose they could have something primitive like a calendar with reminders to staff to check for compliance to new rules on deadline dates, but I'm skeptical.
Maybe someone should email bell.regulatory@bell.ca to "remind" them of their obligations coming due in nine days!
mr.eous is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.