How many run Linux and what problems are you experiencing? - Page 9 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Consumer Electronics and Home Computing > Home Computing > Linux

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-05-16, 11:59 AM   #121
stampeder
OTA Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Delta, BC (96Av x 116St)
Posts: 23,338
Default

That's Ubuntu 11.04, right? Is this still on your Acer laptop?
stampeder is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-05-16, 01:09 PM   #122
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,171
Default

Yes my Acer. I have been fiddling with Samba all morning with no luck. Funny thing is Samba dialog box says I have no shares. smb.conf is also empty of shares. Yet I can see a share (and files) from my Windows XP machine. I know Nautilus File Sharing (which was part of the default desktop) is intertwined. I think when I right-click on a folder and select sharing properties it is in fact Nautilus FS I am looking at. Not nearly as simple as I was hoping. I have not been able to determine if shares in the /media path can actually be shared either. Googling results are abundant but completely all over the place in what to do.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-05-16, 07:51 PM   #123
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,171
Default

Well a mini-success. It turns out my file-sharing woes were due to file permissions. Little did I know that if you (as an admin) set sharing permissions for a share it will not override the file permissions. Even when I tried to edit the PROPERTIES of the enclosed folder it would not apply to the enclosed files. Grrrr as I said it certainly feels like Windows/DOS INI days again.

I know I can use the console but geeze in this day I should not have to.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-05-16, 11:06 PM   #124
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,171
Default

I could really use some fstab help right about now. Here are needed bits to create the entry in the file (incredible the lengths one has to go to). What is giving me concern is the UGO permissions and masks.

removable USB NTFS volume=iomega
uid=1000
gid=1000
UUID=E65488CC5488A0C3
All typical nested file/folders should be visible and readable.
User=Me with Read and Write no execute
Group=Me with Read and Write no execute
Other= Read Only with no execute
mount path=/media/iomega
Automatically mount
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-05-17, 10:55 AM   #125
Francois Caron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,367
Default

It's not unusual for me to have to use the shell commands CHOWN, CHGRP and CHMOD to reset the file permissions.

Yeah. DOS style stuff, only more cryptic. Even when I do know how to fix things, it still drives me nuts how Linux is as complicated and as rude as the computer geeks who designed it.
Francois Caron is online now  
Old 2011-05-18, 05:59 PM   #126
classicsat
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kincardine ON.
Posts: 3,941
Default

My /proc/mounts shows

Code:
/dev/sdb1 /media/FreeAgent\040Drive fuseblk rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,default_permissions,allow_other,blksize=4096 0 0
For my Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB USB drive, NTFS format. There is no fstab entry for it. I can read and write it fine.
I am running ubuntu 10.04.
classicsat is offline  
Old 2011-05-18, 10:23 PM   #127
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,171
Default

Quote:
I can read and write it fine
I can as well. But I am having trouble with it mounting with restricted OTHER permissions. I can manually change the permissions but I prefer to have it mount read only for all.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Old 2011-05-19, 11:36 AM   #128
Ed7789
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Default

If you want to mount an NTFS read-only for everyone, look at the mount command, which can specify that the partition is in forced read-only. An example of the command would be:
Code:
mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/sdc1 /media/MountPoint
It can also be configured in /etc/fstab so it mount on boot as, also, read-only. Note that NTFS permissions simply do not apply to Unix/Linux systems, they only apply to Windows.
Ed7789 is online now  
Old 2011-05-19, 12:00 PM   #129
Jake
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 10,171
Default

That is why I made post 124.
__________________
Tip: See an offending post? Don't reply, report it by clicking on the 'Report Post' icon.
Jake is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.

Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.