Same antenna, Big difference between 2 Tuners - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
 

Go Back   Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums > Canadian Internet, Phone, TV and Wireless Service Providers > Over-The-Air (OTA) Digital Television

Digital Home Helpful Information

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 2011-01-07, 09:43 AM   #1
celek
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 28
Default Same antenna, Big difference between 2 Tuners

Weird stuff...

Antenna CM4221 (the old model)
Cable up to my splitter
- 1 cable, 9 feet to a HTPC, Hauppauge 1600, I receive 11 channels (no CIII, no WUTV, barely CHCH) I am 16th and 48 in Markham
- 1 cable , 30 feet, HDTV LG (or something like that), I get all 20+ channels perfect reception...

I would conclude it is my Haupauge card but.. am I wrong ? (I use media player, wintv and .. can't remember the 3rd one, to check signal strength) and they all report the same issue. Which kinda makes sense.
I believe I installed the latest fix and also I checked the cable was fine (i did not add a filter on the cable to the HTPC)

Thoughts ? links ? Blame ?

Chris
celek is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 2011-01-07, 11:31 AM   #2
Marbles_00
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hamilton: Garth and Rymal
Posts: 600
Default

If you can, you could determine if it could be a cable issue. Run an extension from the 9' cable to your TV. If you pickup only 11 or less channels, then your issue is the cable. If you pickup all 20+ still, then the likely candidate is the 1600 card.

From researching, the 1600 is a mediocre card, and has very mixed reviews. It is an older platform card, which utilizes older tuner technology. A HVR-2250 or 1250 are more sensitive, and could be possible replacements if you have a free PCIe x1 slot available. The 950 USB stick is also supposed to incorporate a decently sensitive tuner as well. There are other manufactures too, but I have not exposed myself to their products, so I can't really recommend anything from them, but others should be able to.
__________________
Mayhem Creations-"The Art Of Emotional Creation"
sites.google.com/site/maycreates/Home -for viewing all my DIY projects
Marbles_00 is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 12:04 PM   #3
jbracing24
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thorold Ontario
Posts: 2,282
Default

It is a fact that the newer the tuner version, the better the capture rate. I have an older Samsung tuner box which may get only half the channels on the same set up as the newest versions built into TV's.
jbracing24 is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 12:38 PM   #4
Marbles_00
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hamilton: Garth and Rymal
Posts: 600
Default

You should also swap ports on the splitter to rule out a bad splitter port.
__________________
Mayhem Creations-"The Art Of Emotional Creation"
sites.google.com/site/maycreates/Home -for viewing all my DIY projects
Marbles_00 is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 02:08 PM   #5
300ohm
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere in Delaware on the flat side
Posts: 7,338
Default

Quote:
It is a fact that the newer the tuner version, the better the capture rate.
Plus they have better multipath performance.
__________________
My builds/plans (not the latest models) are located here.
300ohm is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 07:00 PM   #6
Jase88
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 4,388
Default

I have seen tuners with widely varying degrees of adjacent channel or strong signal rejection.
__________________
DMX 68' tower, HyGain HAM 5 rotator, Antennas Direct 91-XG & C5, Channel Master 7777 preamp, Siemens surge protection
Jase88 is online now  
Old 2011-01-07, 08:46 PM   #7
goforit
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton Mtn.
Posts: 1,513
Default Better Tuner

My LG TV does a better job in getting edge channels than my Samsung or Toshiba, not all tuners and TV components are alike in getting OTA.

There's a thread here that discusses this.
__________________
91XG, YA-1713, CPA-19; Denon AVR-1312
goforit is online now  
Old 2011-01-07, 08:52 PM   #8
ScaryBob
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
Default

I notice a big difference between a Samsung TV and Hauppauge HVR-x250 tuner cards as well. It's especially noticeable with analog TV. There aren't enough ATSC channels here to draw any conclusion with those. I've got to wonder if computer generated noise might have some effect on the S/R ratio in the tuner cards.
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary
ScaryBob is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 09:01 PM   #9
frontpl8
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Strathmore, Ab
Posts: 214
Default

I was considering a samsung as well as i have heard they are really good televisions, but i am wondering if i should rethink that from the perspective of which would be better for ota digital broadcasts.
frontpl8 is offline  
Old 2011-01-07, 10:01 PM   #10
x4mer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Stouffville
Posts: 316
Default

If you haven't already, update the tuner drivers to the latest on the hauppauge web site. Go to the support section for your card, and grab the standalone driver at the bottom of the page (Aug.31/10), and update. While there, grab the signal monitor utility from the support section for your card. With that running, change channels in viewer of choice - do you see any activity at all for the missing channels? High error rates?
x4mer is offline  
Old 2011-01-09, 11:16 PM   #11
Digital_Frank
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of the Lake
Posts: 123
Default

For what it is worth, I receive the same number of channels (24) on my HVR-950Q and both my Samsung TVs (46" LCD and 50" plasma)
Digital_Frank is offline  
Old 2011-01-09, 11:42 PM   #12
ScaryBob
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Dandelion City
Posts: 7,133
Default

Since the HVR-950Q is a USB tuner (outside the PC) my assumption may make some sense. Is the quality the same for NTSC channels?
__________________
At 20 I had a good mind. At 40 I had money. At 60 I've lost my mind and my money. Oh, to be 20 again. --Scary
ScaryBob is offline  
Old 2011-01-10, 09:20 PM   #13
wilspin
Corporate Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rice Lake near Bewdley
Posts: 637
Default

Yup, they can vary greatly. I have 4 tuners that behave differently in weak signal conditions (DTV only) I rate them as
1. Hauppauge Win TV 950q amazing little device I have 2 on one computer.
2. Samsung LCD 32” has some kind of built in gain control/enhancer works well to lock ‘em in.
3. CM 7000 no HD so it may be an advantage to drop to 480 where the others can’t.
4. Wingard 1010* fussy, fussy, first to freeze.
With good signals the all perform equally well.
__________________
60' Delhi tower,91XG,Y13-10,DB8,Tin Lee Traps,CM9521A,CM7777,CM7000,Winegard RC-1010 & HDA200,Samsung 32 LCD,2 WTV950Q

Twinntech supports Digital Home
wilspin is offline  
Old 2011-01-17, 05:11 PM   #14
celek
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Thanks Folks,
Marbles_00: good points, I will check the cable and the splitter
x4mer: Let me re-recheck the driver. I usually use TSReaderLite, will that work too instead of the MyTV one ? (I'll check the error and signal strength)
And I will check the HVR-950Q...

Chris
celek is offline  
Old 2011-02-06, 10:16 PM   #15
celek
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Just for closure on the thread
Installed 950q, got 100% on all channels with exact same setup

thx folks
Chris
celek is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.

OTA Forum Sponsor


Search Digital Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.