Saw "SIGNS" today!

[harmer]

Just saw this movie
It was pretty good.
First thing I noticed was the "titles".
Best I have EVER seen!
Big, Black letters on a silver background.
A person could actually read them.
Give this person an Oscar.
Bad titles have been a bug of mine for years.
They actually pay, and list the name of those responsible
for them in every movie, but most of the time they are
USELESS. Toos small and go by too fast.
Back to the movie!
Better than Unbreakable, not as good as Sixth Sense.
That's it for now.
Don't like to spoil anything.

[hugh]

'Signs' tops weekend box office
The film, starring Mel Gibson as a farmer who finds mysterious patterns marking his fields, raked in $60.3 million, according to studio estimates Sunday

[james99]

The best part:

"Steven Soderbergh's "Full Frontal" debuted with just
$725,000. The comedy about a group of Los
Angeles oddballs had been billed as a return to
Soderbergh's low-budget roots honed more than a
decade ago with "sex, lies and videotape." That film
made about $25 million. "Full Frontal" is on track to
make just $3 million to $4 million domestically, said
David Kaminow, senior vice president of marketing
for Miramax. "


Julia Roberts bombs again.

[Sketcher]

Originally Posted by harmer

Just saw this movie
It was pretty good.
First thing I noticed was the "titles".
Best I have EVER seen!
Big, Black letters on a silver background.

The titles do sound great. I haven't seen the movie. The last time I was impressed with titles was when I watched "Romeo Must Die". I liked how they combined the english names with Cantonese/Mandarin (I don't know which language it was).