Lost the link to the dual boot partition, sorry

There you have it folks

http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070220/tc_pcworld/129126

I think PCWorld is taking a bit of a beating after coming out so strongly in recommending people upgrade to Vista.

The issues with drivers etc were completely ignored or in every article, "the drivers should be ready when Vista ships" - NOT.

The very first annoying thing:If your PC can't run Aero, you have no need for Vista. Period. On machines that aren't Aero-capable, the rest of the OS will run slowly enough that you're better off sticking with XP until it's time to buy a new Vista PC.Complete garbage, nothing to do with reality.
Stopped reading right there...

Diogen.

But you didn't say why that quote is incorrect...

My favorite board - 6150-based - never makes the rating (under 2.5 when 4 is required for Aero).
Any board in the family: MSI, ASUS, Abit. Same chipset and same video - no surprise here.
It never had problems running Vista as good as XP. I posted this before.

To prove the statement being garbage I need just one example.
I have three. Another MSI with ATI onboard was just as good. That makes it four.

Diogen.

Isn't this like all version of windows we've had before?

http://www.smh.com.au/news/security/vista-still-vulnerable/2007/02/26/1172338546822.html