Grammar Pet Peeves - Page 7 - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #91 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-24, 09:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 286
Hmm. I'll have to think about that one over a "samwich."
PG44 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-24, 11:39 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,113
Amazing the amount of tormented souls traumatized for a lifetime by grade 5 grammar and spelling.
haystack is offline  
post #93 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-25, 03:41 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A charted un-desert isle
Posts: 2,465
Another pet peeve: using "amount" with regards to a number of items (as in "amount of tormented souls" ), where "number" should be used.

This is similar to the "less" (general quantity) and "fewer" (number of items) frequent mis-use.
Nuje is offline  
post #94 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-28, 09:04 PM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Does anybody know when to use "further" vs."farther"? I constantly hear newsreaders say "farther" when in my mind I think they should have used "further." e.g. "They couldn't go any farther up the river due to the rapids." He couldn't swim any farther because of leg cramps." etc.
MAXAM is offline  
post #95 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-28, 09:18 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 3,668
Your examples are actually correct - farther is a measure of distance (near vs. far)

Further refers to "amount" or time (as in, "we need to discuss this further to determine what the best action should be").
BGY11 is online now  
post #96 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-04-28, 09:42 PM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Thanks BGY11 for your quick response. I've always wondered when to use it.
MAXAM is offline  
post #97 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-13, 03:01 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Prince Edward Island — Shaw Direct (HD)
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by BGY11 View Post
Just wondering which one is correct in that regard, or if it can go both ways.

For example, "#1 Hits of the 80s" or "80's #1 Hits." (Which one would be correct in this comparison?)

Edit: Hmm, looking at it, it seems my first example would apply to hits from all of the years between '80 and '89, while the second one would just be for 1980.
Sorry for the delay in response, but yes, you're right. The latter would apply only to 1980, not the entire 1980s decade.
CrazyInSane is offline  
post #98 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-14, 09:15 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyInSane View Post
Sorry for the delay in response, but yes, you're right. The latter would apply only to 1980, not the entire 1980s decade.
"80s' #1 Hits".........would refer to the decade.
Korak is offline  
post #99 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-14, 10:09 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 11,017
Her 80s' and 90s hits.

Toss in a pronoun, a series of plural nouns and make them possessive and I can see why anyone might get confused. Is that correct?
Jake is offline  
post #100 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-14, 11:59 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Prince Edward Island — Shaw Direct (HD)
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korak View Post
"80s' #1 Hits".........would refer to the decade.
Exactly, meaning they are the #1 hits of (possessive) the 1980s decade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
Her 80s' and 90s hits.
I'm pretty sure there wouldn't be any apostrophes, because the entire thought is: "Her (collection of) 80s and 90s hits". But yes, decade and year–related grammar is very confusing.
CrazyInSane is offline  
post #101 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-15, 09:43 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 3,668
I think CrazyInSane is correct, since the hits belong to her, not the decade in question.
BGY11 is online now  
post #102 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-16, 01:12 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 15
This drives me around the bend.You see it on Digital Home quite often as it is a common spelling mistake. Misspelling as "Reciever" when it should be "Receiver"
We were taught this verse in school."I" before "E" except after "C", or as sounded as "A" as in "Neighbour" and "Weigh"
daviharr is offline  
post #103 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-16, 10:14 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 3,668
Then there's the odd weird word that doesn't quite follow that rule.
BGY11 is online now  
post #104 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-17, 10:09 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gatineau and Ottawa
Posts: 11,017
I wonder why the folks that brought us English verbs did not fix read (reed) and read (red).
Jake is offline  
post #105 of 127 (permalink) Old 2010-05-20, 04:33 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 286
I often hear people say they will speak "to" a point or an issue, particularly in meetings (e.g. There are financial implications with this option, and I will speak to that a little later."). Is this correct, or should they not speak "on" or "about" a point?
PG44 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome