looking for leafs tv HD channel on star choice - Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-25, 08:27 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 181
looking for leafs tv HD channel on star choice

friend looking for channel,help please
a1g77luvvy is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-25, 08:36 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Muskoka, Ontario
Posts: 834
Not on SC

tell your friend to NOT give his money to MLSE. Maybe that way they may be pressured to put a decent product on the ice.
smp01 is online now  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-26, 02:53 AM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 381
Till transponder space gets cheaper dont bet on this channel. Its a niche channel that broadcasts a minority of Leafs games in HD per hockey season. Hardly worth beaming down in 1080i.
sabres12 is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-26, 03:31 AM
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,293
But all they have to do is use a temporary HD channel only 20 times/year for 3 hours each time. That is what Bell does.
jumpy27 is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-26, 08:39 AM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grimsby, Ont.
Posts: 3,222
Starchoice just doesn't want to pay for it. You'll need a serious television provider for Leafs TV HD.


Sony XBR65X930D | Denon AVR-X1300W | BELL 9400 | Panasonic DMP-UB900 4K | XBOX One S
scrooloose is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-26, 08:42 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 699
Crosby and that new Tlusty kid looked awesome in 1080 widescreen
smootherator is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-26, 07:51 PM
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rockies
Posts: 3,190
If it's not on the SBS feeds, then it's NOT *C fault or much they can do about it.
This valuable National resource is just that, National, so niche markets just don't matter.

BTW Mike, Shaw is a serious TV provider with millions of cable AND Sat customers AND operate a national network for millions more, so I find your remarks totally without merit!
ARR is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-27, 11:30 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 93

But since TO is the centre of the universe how come everyone doesn't want to waste an HD space on the leafs. If they did this I would complain. How about TLC or a channel people watch being added long before the Laughs channel.
hudson3709 is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-29, 12:44 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 77
That argument seems weak, given that Bell Expressvu offers the Leafs TV HD channel. It's a matter of competition for StarChoise as much as it is a 'niche' channel that only leaf fans would be interested in.

Obviously Bell see's the value in it...Starchoice should seriously look into this as a channel to add in the near future as well, or they may find more and more serious leaf fans (and you're naive to think that means peanuts to a provider) start leaving Starchoice, or new viewers going with Bell or Rogers based on the fact that yes...20 more leaf games a year will be in HD.
Renton is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-29, 03:13 PM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rural Hamilton
Posts: 279
Most Canadians like to jump on Toronto (and Toronto based "Centre of the Universe" companies) - in most cases this is deserved.

However, the same attitude prevails at Shaw in reverse - stick it to the easteners and SC subs.

They sure didn't want B.C. cable customers flooding the lines during the World Series on Sunday night. So they delivered the Canucks game to cable head ends + BC SC subs on ch 299.

Oh ... but as F2 tr 25 sits empty right ... Shaw is just too cheap to uplink Sportsnet2 HD + Leafs HD feeds.. to 299 for the 3 hours that it takes up every week or so. They want to make sure that the SC customer base doesn't increase in the next quarter which will decrease Shaw profit.
Mr. Perfect is offline  
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-29, 06:49 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,995
Actually, there is something in the guide right now (Somewhere in the 400's) about Sportsnet west customers being able to watch an HD game (can't remember what) on channel 469.
TJ77 is offline  
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-30, 12:29 PM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 381
If LeafsTV HD is a deal breaker you can go to EVU. Besides as more HD is added eventually *C will probably get LeafsTV HD (even though its a waste of space since it cant be targeted to the majority of subscribers). Its never a matter of 'IF' its always a matter of 'WHEN'. If a switch to EVU is necessary for some due to not having LeafsTV HD its such a such a small chunk of subscribers *C probably wouldn't even notice.
sabres12 is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-30, 01:36 PM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Heidelberg,ON
Posts: 1,252
I am not sure if I would pay a whole lot for Leafs HDTV anyways...

l had Leafs TV (SD) last year, and it was about $2-$3/month IIRC. I might pay the same amount for 2 extra Leafs HD games / month.

Unless it's Sat. night, I rarely watch the leafs... The product is just not that good.

I prefer my weekday entertainment (downtime after the kids go to bed) to be either shows like The Unit, NCIS, Bionic Woman, 24 etc., plus xbox 360 time.


Panny 47wx52, DMR-e80*C DSR500x2, XBOX 360, Toshiba 26hf84, LG 37LC2D
Petee_C is offline  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-10-30, 01:39 PM
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 361
The only time that SC does anything is when the churn numbers, in a quarter, reach a number that it looks like there will be negative growth for that period.

Just look at the last 12 quarterly Shaw reports. SC averages a year over year 5% increase in revenue. This is due TOTALLY to price increases (that's $9 for the average sub over this period).

Shaw is not interested in SC or Shaw Cable service except to produce free cash flow to expand internet + telephone business. The only reason that NHL CI was added to Shaw/SC is because Shaw actually had a decrease in subs to their cable system in the last quarter. This in a time when their main geographical area served is experiencing the biggest growth rates in Canada.

Want more HD channels on SC - just have 4 or 5,000 subs cancel in the next 30 days. That's the way Shaw has been operating for years.

I'm not washed up yet
Donnybrook is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old 2007-11-01, 02:09 AM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 381
AND the reason Star Choice packaged it with NFL ST was to get subs that went to Bell for CI back. It was to retain customers who would switch for CI (which are many per year) and to gain old customers who are sick of EVU back. So yes. It was to stop customers from having a reason to switch to Bell/Rogers. Plain and simple. Besides I think they got a decent deal for the package based on what they're selling it for to consumers.
sabres12 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Canadian TV, Computing and Home Theatre Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome